Skeletal remains debunk myth around 1918 flu pandemic
New research casts doubt on widely held assumption that virus predominantly affected the young and healthy
Analysis of skeletal remains from more than a century ago has suggested the most widely held assumption around one of the most devastating pandemics in history may be false.
Flu typically kills the very young, the old and the sick. That made the so-called Spanish flu pandemic in 1918 "unusual, or so the story goes", said Gina Kolata in The New York Times. It is an anomaly because it is believed to have struck healthy adults in their prime as often, if not more often, than the weak or sickly.
The virus is thought to have killed at least 50 million people globally, or between 1.3% and 3% of the world's population. Covid-19, in contrast, killed 0.09% of the population. The assumption that the 1918 virus affected the young and healthy has "influenced research and literature for decades", said Phys.org but now new research has found that it may not have been true.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What do the new findings reveal?
The paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences analysed bio-archaeological data on age at death and skeletal lesions from 369 individuals who died before and during the 1918 influenza pandemic in the United States. It found those who suffered from chronic diseases or nutritional deficiencies were more than twice as likely to die as those who did not have such conditions, irrespective of age.
"So many people fell ill that doctors at the time believed that healthy people were equally likely to die as those who were already sick or frail," said the report's authors. These results show that "even in the past, people with evidence of prior environmental, social and nutritional stress were most likely to die".
The 1918 virus did kill young people, said Kolata, but "it was no exception to the observation that infectious diseases kill frail and sicker people most readily".
Why is it important?
Sharon DeWitte, an anthropologist at the University of Colorado and an author of the paper, said the finding had a clear message: "We should never expect any non-accidental cause of death to be indiscriminate."
Like Covid-19 a century later or even the Black Death, which wiped out as much as third of the population of Europe in the 14th century, researchers suspect that socioeconomic status, education, and access to health care may have played a role in the high 1918 death toll.
These findings "shine a light on how modern-day communities could better prepare for pandemics and reveal potential shortfalls in relying exclusively on written texts to understand the past", said Phys.org.
The main lesson going forward, said the scientific news site, is the "danger in public health messaging that suggests everybody is equally likely to get sick".
"What we have learned is that in future pandemics there will almost certainly be variation between individuals in the risk of death," said DeWitte. "If we know what factors elevate that risk, we can expend resources to reduce them – and that's better for the population in general."
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Today's political cartoons - April 28, 2024
Cartoons Sunday's cartoons - airline safety, teleprompter gaffs, and more
By The Week US Published
-
5 doom 'n' gloom cartoons about the mess we're in
Cartoons Artists take on long-term pessimism, dystopian fears, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The Church of England's legacy of slavery
The Explainer Should the CofE offer financial redress for its involvement in the transatlantic slave trade?
By The Week UK Published
-
Doctors are taking on dental duties in low-income areas
Under the radar Physicians are biting into the dentistry industry
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Nigeria's worsening rate of maternal mortality
Under the radar Economic crisis is making hospitals unaffordable, with women increasingly not receiving the care they need
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Covid four years on: have we got over the pandemic?
Today's Big Question Brits suffering from both lockdown nostalgia and collective trauma that refuses to go away
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
The alarming rise of cancer in young people
Under the radar Cancer rates are rising, and the cause is not clear
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Narcan is becoming harder to find at drugstores across America
Under the Radar The drug, also known as naloxone, reverses the effects of an opioid overdose
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The hollow classroom
Opinion Remote school let kids down. It will take much more than extra tutoring for kids to recover.
By Mark Gimein Published
-
How Tehran became the world's nose job capital
Under the radar Iranian doctors raise alarm over low costs, weak regulation and online influence of 'Western beauty standards'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The rise in illegal pregnancy termination investigations
Under the Radar 'Unprecedented' number of women being prosecuted prompts medical body to tell members not to report suspected cases to police
By The Week UK Published