Skeletal remains debunk myth around 1918 flu pandemic
New research casts doubt on widely held assumption that virus predominantly affected the young and healthy

Analysis of skeletal remains from more than a century ago has suggested the most widely held assumption around one of the most devastating pandemics in history may be false.
Flu typically kills the very young, the old and the sick. That made the so-called Spanish flu pandemic in 1918 "unusual, or so the story goes", said Gina Kolata in The New York Times. It is an anomaly because it is believed to have struck healthy adults in their prime as often, if not more often, than the weak or sickly.
The virus is thought to have killed at least 50 million people globally, or between 1.3% and 3% of the world's population. Covid-19, in contrast, killed 0.09% of the population. The assumption that the 1918 virus affected the young and healthy has "influenced research and literature for decades", said Phys.org but now new research has found that it may not have been true.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What do the new findings reveal?
The paper published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences analysed bio-archaeological data on age at death and skeletal lesions from 369 individuals who died before and during the 1918 influenza pandemic in the United States. It found those who suffered from chronic diseases or nutritional deficiencies were more than twice as likely to die as those who did not have such conditions, irrespective of age.
"So many people fell ill that doctors at the time believed that healthy people were equally likely to die as those who were already sick or frail," said the report's authors. These results show that "even in the past, people with evidence of prior environmental, social and nutritional stress were most likely to die".
The 1918 virus did kill young people, said Kolata, but "it was no exception to the observation that infectious diseases kill frail and sicker people most readily".
Why is it important?
Sharon DeWitte, an anthropologist at the University of Colorado and an author of the paper, said the finding had a clear message: "We should never expect any non-accidental cause of death to be indiscriminate."
Like Covid-19 a century later or even the Black Death, which wiped out as much as third of the population of Europe in the 14th century, researchers suspect that socioeconomic status, education, and access to health care may have played a role in the high 1918 death toll.
These findings "shine a light on how modern-day communities could better prepare for pandemics and reveal potential shortfalls in relying exclusively on written texts to understand the past", said Phys.org.
The main lesson going forward, said the scientific news site, is the "danger in public health messaging that suggests everybody is equally likely to get sick".
"What we have learned is that in future pandemics there will almost certainly be variation between individuals in the risk of death," said DeWitte. "If we know what factors elevate that risk, we can expend resources to reduce them – and that's better for the population in general."
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Does depopulation threaten humanity?
Talking Points Falling birth rates could create a 'smaller, sadder, poorer future'
-
New White House guidance means federal employees could be hearing more religious talk at work
The Explainer Employees can now try to persuade co-workers of why their religion is 'correct'
-
Real-life couples creating real-deal sparks in the best movies to star IRL partners
The Week Recommends The chemistry between off-screen items can work wonders
-
Food may contribute more to obesity than exercise
Under the radar The devil's in the diet
-
Scientists are developing artificial blood for use in emergencies
Under the radar It could aid in global blood shortages
-
Babies born using 3 people's DNA lack hereditary disease
Under the Radar The method could eliminate mutations for future generations
-
Scientists have identified 4 distinct autism subtypes
Under the radar They could lead to more accurate diagnosis and care
-
Is that the buzzing sound of climate change worsening sleep apnea?
Under the radar Catching diseases, not those ever-essential Zzs
-
Deadly fungus tied to a pharaoh's tomb may help fight cancer
Under the radar A once fearsome curse could be a blessing
-
Climate change can impact our gut health
Under the radar The gastrointestinal system is being gutted
-
Children's breakfast cereals are getting more unhealthy
Under the radar Your kids may be starting their day with more than a spoonful of sugar