Can TrumpRx really lower drug prices?

Pfizer’s deal with Trump sent drugmaker stocks higher

Illustration of a medication pill bottle filling up with quarters
TrumpRx ‘looks like a political branding exercise’
(Image credit: Illustration by Stephen Kelly / Shutterstock)

Call him the Pharmacist-in-Chief. President Donald Trump last week announced the launch of TrumpRx, a website where Americans will be able to find discounted medicine. It is part of a “sweeping deal” with Pfizer to offer lower-priced drugs to the public.

The pharmaceutical company will highlight many of its brand-name drugs at a 50% discount on the new website, said CNN. (The site will not “sell or distribute medications” but instead let users find their meds and then be “redirected to manufacturers’ direct-to-consumer channels.”) The move ends “price gouging at the expense of American families,” said Trump.

The company said it will also expand its American manufacturing, a step in a broader agreement in which it gets a “three-year reprieve on certain tariffs on pharmaceutical imports,” said CNN. But experts are not sure if the discounts will mean much to most Americans, who “often depend on insurance coverage” to pay for their prescriptions.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

“Meaningfully cutting U.S. drug prices can be difficult,” said The Washington Post. American officials last year negotiated lower prices for 10 of Medicare’s most expensive drugs, but the costs remained “twice as high as those in European and other comparable countries.” Any attempt to push prices still lower “must overcome the political might of the pharmaceutical companies,” which are armed with one of America’s “best-funded Washington lobbying machines.”

What did the commentators say?

The problem is “not greedy pharma firms,” said The Economist. American prescription drugs are costly for reasons found “further along the supply chain.” Most “excess profits” on medicines are taken by “hospitals and middlemen such as insurers, distributors and pharmacy-benefit managers.” If America threatens drugmaker profits, those companies will “take fewer risks on innovation.” Trump’s cure for high prices, then, is “worse than the disease.”

“Why does the federal government need to become a drug marketer?” said The Wall Street Journal. While TrumpRx will sell drugs like Xeljanz, Zavzpret and Eucrisa, the truth is that most Americans “pay far less out-of-pocket for medicines using their insurance cards” and that spending “accounts for a mere 1% of U.S. health care spending.” Rather than being a solution, TrumpRx “looks like a political branding exercise.”

Trump’s new website is a “pretend solution” for high drug prices, said The American Prospect. The administration’s One Big Beautiful Bill included a provision that protects “certain high-cost drugs” from Medicare’s price negotiations and thus “protects several billion dollars” in drugmaker profits. This means TrumpRx will offer “select discounts for a few while keeping the real price the same.”

What next?

Pfizer’s deal with Trump “caused an uproar within much of the pharmaceutical industry,” said Axios. The announcement puts pressure on other drugmakers to “fall in line” after “months of unified resistance” to Trump’s demands for lower prices. The president expects some of those companies to “make deals in the coming weeks” to offer lower prices or else face higher tariffs.

But the deal was “far less punishing” than the industry expected, said Reuters. The result? Stocks for pharmaceutical companies rose after Trump’s announcement.

Joel Mathis, The Week US

Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.