Flechette shells: is their use by Israel legal?
Israel accused of using imprecise 'flechette shells', which shower a target with tiny steel darts

Israel stands accused of using deadly flechette shells in Gaza, a weapon described as illegal under "rules of humanitarian law" by one Israeli human rights organisation.
According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights (PCHR), the shells, which shower thousands of tiny darts over a given area, were fired on the village of Khuzaa, east of Khan Younis, on 17 July, The Guardian reports.
The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) did not deny using the weapon, but claimed that all munitions it is using in the Gaza conflict are legal. "As a rule, the IDF only employs weapons that have been determined lawful under international law, and in a manner which fully conforms with the laws of armed conflict," a spokesperson said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Flechette shells are usually fired by a tank and are designed to explode in the air over a target, showering it with thousands of tiny steel darts around 4cm (1.57 ins) long.
The shells have been used by the IDF before in Gaza, and were ruled to be legal by the Israeli supreme court in 2002. But B'Tselem, an Israeli human rights organisation, says that while they are not expressly forbidden under international humanitarian law the shells carry "a particularly high danger of harming innocent civilians".
Consequently, their use in Gaza must be considered illegal, B'Tselem says, because "one of the most fundamental principles is the obligation to distinguish between those who are involved and those who are not involved in the fighting, and to avoid to the extent possible injury to those who are not involved. Deriving from this principle is the prohibition of the use of an imprecise weapon which is likely to result in civilian injuries".
The reports of flachette shells emerged as Gaza experienced its bloodiest day since the conflict began on 8 July, as more than 100 Palestinians and 13 Israeli soldiers were reported killed. Another 20 Palestinians have been killed in strikes today, the BBC reports, 16 of them in southern Gaza.
In 2008 and 2009, the IDF used artillery shells containing white phosphorous in civilian areas of Gaza. Human Rights Watch said the deployment of the weapon was evidence of war crimes.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Easy listening: the best audiobooks
The Week Recommends Swap hefty hardbacks for hands-free reading this summer
-
Sharenting: does covering children's faces on social media protect them?
In The Spotlight Privacy trend has 'trickled down' from celebrity parents but it may not protect your kids
-
Syria's returning refugees
The Explainer Thousands of Syrian refugees are going back to their homeland but conditions there remain extremely challenging
-
The armed clan allied with Israel in Gaza
Under the Radar Self-styled 'Popular Forces' has been denounced by its Bedouin tribe and Hamas for 'collaborating' with Israel
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump says Iran and Israel agreed to ceasefire
Speed Read This followed a night of Israeli airstrikes on Tehran and multiple waves of missiles fired by Iran
-
How developed was Iran's nuclear program and what's left now?
Today's Big Question Israel and the United States have said different things about Iran's capabilities
-
Trump gives himself 2 weeks for Iran decision
Speed Read Trump said he believes negotiations will occur in the near future
-
What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION A precise attack could break Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into a drawn-out war even more damaging than Iraq or Afghanistan
-
US says Trump vetoed Israeli strike on Khamenei
Speed Read This comes as Israel and Iran pushed their conflict into its fourth day