Prevent: is it failing to stop terrorism?
Long-awaited review says counter-terrorism programme needs greater focus on Islamist terrorism

A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
Thank you for signing up to TheWeek. You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
“Born out of the 7/7 bombings in London that killed 52 people, the Prevent programme is one of the pillars of the Government’s counterterrorism strategy,” said The Times.
It works on the idea that “prevention is better than cure”: if potential terrorists can be spotted early, by teachers and social workers, they can be “educated away” from violence. “That is the theory.”
In practice, according to William Shawcross, author of a long-awaited review published last week, things “can be worryingly different”. Shawcross believes that Prevent must focus on its core remit, particularly on Islamist terrorism.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In recent years, he suggests, it has paid too much attention to far-right radicalism, which, while a problem, “poses a much less potent threat to life and limb”. There is a reluctance among some to identify potential Islamist terrorists, “for fear of being labelled racist”. Meanwhile, people voicing populist right-wing sentiments “too often end up being referred despite harbouring no violent intent”.
A ‘controversial’ strategy
Prevent is “naturally controversial”, said Brendan Cox in The Independent. Because it involves acting before a crime is committed, it is often caricatured as a kind of “thought police”. Yet it’s a voluntary programme – you have to agree to be referred – so it needs public support. And a perception that it is biased against Muslims “has plagued it since its inception”.
A thorough review would have been a very good thing. Sadly, the choice of Shawcross was unfortunate. In 2012, he described “Europe and Islam” as “one of the most terrifying problems of our future”; he has also defended the use of waterboarding at Guantánamo Bay. This made it almost impossible for his review to “hold credibility”.
‘Failing to prevent’
Even so, Shawcross is right, said Rod Liddle in The Sunday Times. Prevent is failing. “Of the 13 terrorist attacks on our shores in the past six years, seven were carried out by people who had previously been referred to Prevent.” Some groups it has funded have advocated Islamist extremism. It’s also focusing on the wrong people: only 22% of its referrals are of Islamists, compared with 80% of active investigations by counter-terrorist police.
It’s true that Prevent doesn’t work, said Kenan Malik in The Observer. It “too often fails to prevent that which should be prevented while attempting to prevent that which should be permissible”. For instance, it regards support for Palestine as a potential “warning light”, and it draws universities and schools into its intrusive system of surveillance. It’s not a review we need: it’s a “complete reassessment of counter-terror strategy”.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.
Sign up to our 10 Things You Need to Know Today newsletter
A free daily digest of the biggest news stories of the day - and the best features from our website
-
The Proud Boys: paying the price for attacking the Capitol
Why Everyone's Talking About A judge sentenced Enrique Tarrio, former leader of the far-right group, to 22 years in federal prison for seditious conspiracy
By The Week Staff Published
-
Police told to target shoplifters
Talking Point Policing Minister Chris Philp calls on forces to investigate thefts even if goods worth less than £200
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Lucy Letby’s motivation: a ‘void’ in the harrowing case
feature Like most serial killers, the former nurse has been silent about what drove her to kill multiple babies
By The Week Staff Published
-
PSNI breach: is the UK taking data security seriously enough?
Today's Big Question Accidental release of personal details of 10,000 Northern Irish police employees could have lethal consequences
By The Week Staff Published
-
British shops: fighting a crimewave?
Talking Point The Co-op warned that parts of our cities are now at risk of becoming no-go areas for shops
By The Week Staff Published
-
Grooming gangs taskforce: defying political correctness or dog whistle politics?
Talking Point Use of ethnicity data to crack down on child exploitation criticised but could prove popular with public
By The Week Staff Published
-
Is breaking up Scotland Yard the answer to its problems?
Talking Point Reforming Metropolitan Police likened to ‘turning the Titanic’ as the force faces scandals fallout
By Hollie Clemence Published
-
Attacking the grid
Speed Read Domestic terrorism targeting the U.S. electric grid is exposing dangerous vulnerabilities
By The Week Staff Published