WhatsApp and other encrypted messaging services have called for the UK government to “urgently rethink” its controversial Online Safety Bill, hinting that they would rather be blocked from operating in Britain than weaken their privacy settings.
In a bid to crack down on harmful content online, including child abuse images and hate speech, ministers want the media regulator, Ofcom, to be able to ask platforms to monitor users. This would include “mandatory oversight into all elements of user interactions”, said Social Media Today, something critics claim would “open the door to trying to force technology companies to break end-to-end encryption on private messaging services”.
In what the publication called a “last ditch effort” to get the government to amend its bill, WhatsApp (owned by Facebook parent company Meta), Signal, Element, Threema, Session, Viber and Wire have signed an open letter claiming the proposed legislation “poses an unprecedented threat to the privacy, safety and security of every UK citizen and the people with whom they communicate around the world, while emboldening hostile governments who may seek to draft copy-cat laws”.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
What did the papers say?
It ultimately comes down to whether it is possible to have both privacy and child safety online, a “debate that has seen consecutive Conservative Party governments ping-pong between more onerous restrictions”, sad Politico.
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (NSPCC) has called direct messaging “the front line” of child sexual abuse, said the BBC, but critics warn that any attempt to undermine end-to-end encryption could have dangerous consequences for free speech and privacy both at home and abroad.
Speaking to journalists in London last month, the head of WhatsApp at Meta, Will Cathcart, “did everything but compare the UK’s proposed new internet law to the erosion of online privacy in countries like Iran, India, and Brazil”, Wired reported.
Seeking to “whip up a row with the government about end-to-end encryption”, Cathcart claimed that “out of all the regulations he has seen in the Western world” governing online privacy and free speech, “the UK’s Online Safety Bill is the one he’s most alarmed about”.
But, despite what Cathcart and others say, “the bill isn’t really about encryption”, said Wired. “It’s a sprawling, Frankenstein’s monster of a bill that has endured a period of extreme turbulence in British politics, outlasting four prime ministers and five digital ministers – with each change of government adding in new amendments and concessions.”
The government has been quick to stress that the bill “in no way represents a ban on end-to-end encryption, nor will it require services to weaken encryption”. However, WhatsApp has previously made it clear it will not comply with any requests to weaken its security, putting it on a “collision course with the government”, the Independent reported.
The amended bill is expected to head back to Parliament in the summer and become law by September, but Cathcart has already suggested WhatsApp would rather be blocked in the UK than weaken the privacy of encrypted messaging, a threat repeated by Signal’s president Meredith Whittaker in an interview with the BBC. “Other companies have also told BBC News of their unwillingness to comply,” the broadcaster reported.
Meta has already vowed to expand end-to-end encrypted messaging to its other platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, while Twitter is moving towards full encryption for direct messages, meaning “all of these tools could be under threat, which could have a big impact on how they operate in the region”, said Social Media Today.
“Nobody really knows for sure” if a ban would or could actually happen, said the Independent. “At the moment it is more a warning or a danger than it is a concrete scenario. But that doesn’t mean that companies and the government are not necessarily practically planning for it, at least behind the scenes.”
Talk of Meta pulling out of the UK entirely “still seems like an extreme measure”, said Social Media Today, “but at the least, WhatsApp could be forced out of the market, before Meta considers its other messaging tools”.
Ideally, said the news site, “a compromise can be met, but WhatsApp seems serious about its stance, which could lead to a definitive stand-off ahead of the Bill being enacted”.
Continue reading for free
We hope you're enjoying The Week's refreshingly open-minded journalism.
Subscribed to The Week? Register your account with the same email as your subscription.