The High Court’s ruling on Rwanda deportations
Judges decide government scheme is ‘consistent’ with human rights laws but appeals are likely
The Government won a significant legal victory this week when the High Court ruled that its plan to deport asylum seekers to Rwanda is lawful.
Delivering the ruling, Lord Justice Lewis said that the Government scheme was “consistent” with the UN’s refugee conventions and UK human rights laws. However, he said that the cases of the eight asylum seekers who had applied for the judicial review (with refugee charities and a civil service union) had not been considered properly, and ordered that they be reassessed.
Last week, four migrants drowned in the Channel when the inflatable boat they were travelling in started to sink in freezing conditions. A day earlier, Rishi Sunak had unveiled a five-point plan to stem the number of people attempting the crossing; it includes new laws to ensure that migrants who arrive via unofficial routes have no right to remain, and a coordinated “small boats command”, to patrol the Channel.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Why did the High Court make it’s decision?
The High Court made the right call, said The Daily Telegraph. The process of removing people who arrive “without good reason or permission” should be “straight-forward”. Yet successive governments have had their reforms to the system undone by the courts.
The Rwanda policy “appeared scuppered” in June, when the European Court of Human Rights stepped in at the 11th hour and said that deportation flights could not proceed until the legal challenges were exhausted. In a “sane world”, the Government would be able to implement its flagship policy now, said The Sun; but alas, there is sure to be an appeal.
The court wasn’t asked to rule on whether the policy was humane, practical or cost-effective, said The Independent. Had it been, it might have decided that it was “none of those things”. The scheme has already cost £140m, before a single migrant has reached Rwanda – a state with a less than exemplary human rights record. And the fact that people are still dying in the Channel suggests that it is not having the deterrent effect the Government has claimed as one of its key benefits.
Why is the Government so keen on the policy?
Home Secretary Suella Braverman’s “dream of sending asylum seekers to Rwanda is still alive”, said Rajeev Syal in The Guardian. And for “visceral political reasons”, it has become Sunak’s obsession too.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Aghast at polls suggesting that voters are shifting their support to Labour and Nigel Farage’s Reform UK party, Tory MPs are demanding he put a stop to the crossings, and the drownings.
But with legal challenges sure to continue, it could be years before deportations to Rwanda can begin. In the meantime, said Nick Ferrari in the Daily Express, Sunak will have to rely on his new plan making a dent in the number of small boats that leave France. Its “main planks” include a deal with Tirana to allow for the rapid deportation of arrivals from Albania; and the new boats command, combining the police, the Army, and Border Force.
Typically, his plan has met with howls of left-wing outrage, said Richard Littlejohn in the Daily Mail. But until the Government smashes the smugglers’ business model, people will keep coming.
So what happens next?
Yes, this is a worsening problem, said Arshad Isakjee in the Financial Times. Some 40,000 people arrived in small boats this year, up from 28,000 in 2021. But asylum seekers are forced to take dangerous, irregular routes to the UK because for most, there are no “safe and legal” ones.
The chances of the Government opening up more of those are remote, said Ian Dunt in the i newspaper. But it could at least speed up the claims process. The UK received 48,540 asylum applications in 2021 – “well below” the numbers in the early 2000s. Yet the backlog has quadrupled since then, leaving 117,000 people in limbo, and the taxpayer forking out £5.5m per day to house them in hotels. Sunak recognises the problem: he plans to boost the number of claim processors, and streamline the process for migrants from Syria, Afghanistan and Iraq. But such steps don’t go nearly far enough. “Nothing is going to stop people coming to the UK.” What the Government can do is ensure that their applications are processed speedily, and humanely, when they arrive.
Speaking after the High Court’s ruling, Braverman said that she wants to deliver deportations of asylum seekers to Rwanda “at scale and as soon as possible”. But the PM’s spokesman acknowledged that it was “impossible” to know when deportations might begin.
Current immigration levels of more than a million arrivals a year may become the norm, according to the Social Market Foundation think-tank. Its report said that, owing to the UK’s ageing population and skills shortages, the country will continue to need immigrant workers.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
-
New York wins WNBA title, nearly nabs World Series
Speed Read The Yankees with face the Los Angeles Dodgers in the upcoming Fall Classic
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The best ski resorts for a winter escape
The Week Recommends From the Dolomites to the Pyrenees, these are Europe's top ski destinations
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Trump does McDonald's, lauds golfer's genitals
Speed Read The former president worked the fryer at a restaurant in suburban Philadelphia
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Alex Salmond: charismatic politician who nearly broke up the Union
In the Spotlight Remembering the former First Minister who 'normalised' the cause of Scottish independence
By The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Trump blames migrants for the housing crisis. Experts aren't so sure.
Talking Points Migrants need housing. They also build it.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
The Chagos agreement explained
In Depth Ceding the islands to Mauritius could allow China to gain foothold in the Indo-Pacific, experts have warned
By The Week UK Published
-
Kamala Harris immigration policy reflects 'changing national mood'
The explainer Her emphasis is enforcement
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Russia's best investment
Opinion Eric Adams isn't the only politician with foreign benefactors
By William Falk Published
-
Hyperbole and hatred: can heated rhetoric kill?
Talking Point Hypocrisy and double standards are certainly rife, but the link between heated political language and real-world violence is unclear
By The Week UK Published
-
What does Hezbollah want?
The Explainer Israel has turned its fire on Hezbollah, the enemy across its northern border in Lebanon that it has been fighting for 40 years
By The Week UK Published