ICE eyes new targets post-Minnesota retreat

Following backlash over the shooting deaths of two American citizens in Minneapolis, Immigration and Customs Enforcement has ended its immigration surge in Minnesota. This may cool temperatures in Minneapolis, but ICE is now looking to implement immigration efforts in new cities, concerning Democratic officials that more social unrest could come.

In ICE’s sights

Several cities and states are reportedly on ICE’s list to send officers. One of the most notable is a Republican-led state. The Trump administration is “eyeing Ohio for immigration enforcement operations” that are “expected to target Haitian immigrants,” said MS Now. This is largely due to the expiration of their Temporary Protected Status earlier this month.

If this does happen, Springfield, Ohio, would likely be one of the most targeted cities. Springfield has an estimated Haitian population of 12,000 to 15,000 and was the target of a conspiracy theory about Haitian immigrants eating cats and dogs that was spread by both President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, later proven to be false. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials claim they do “not have concrete plans to launch immigration enforcement efforts in Springfield but plan to deport Haitian immigrants,” said WCMH-TV Columbus.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Prominent Democrat-led areas are also likely to be in ICE’s crosshairs. In a public town hall for the San Francisco Bay Area, officials “asked the question: Could Northern California be the next target for a heavy-handed federal immigration enforcement crackdown?” said Bay City News. This concern follows claims that ICE would conduct immigration operations at Super Bowl LX, which took place in Santa Clara. (ICE agents did not end up patrolling the game, according to the NFL.)

As a result, California counties like Oakland’s Alameda are “hoping to create a response plan” for ICE activities, said KGO-TV San Francisco. This includes policy proposals to have “ICE-free zones.” These zones would “prohibit ICE from county-owned and controlled properties, such as the courts and hospitals.” Alameda County officials see these steps as “important safeguards for the community.”

The ‘biggest driver’

There are also questions as to how ICE determines which cities to target. While the Trump administration has largely been quiet on this, former ICE officials have been more vocal. The “biggest driver would be immigrant population, how significant a population is there in that particular community,” John Sandweg, who served as director of ICE from 2013 to 2014, said to Fox News. Another determinant is if there’s a “sanctuary policy that would increase the number of at-large targets," said Sandweg to Fox. Those are the “traditional factors that ICE would rely on in making determinations about where to do at-large surges.”

Despite DHS potentially losing funding due to a partial government shutdown, these targeted enforcement efforts may not end soon. ICE “does not have the manpower” to target every city in the U.S., said Jacob Hamburger, a law professor at Marquette University, to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. But the “point of a lot of these operations is to get everybody thinking, ‘What if we’re next?’”