Which EU laws will Britain keep after all?
U-turn on ‘bonfire of Brussels laws’ could mean a reprieve for working-time legislation and safety standards
The government is to drastically reduce the number of EU laws it had planned to scrap by the end of the year as part of Rishi Sunak’s bonfire of Brussels rules and regulations.
In January, the prime minister publicly backed the Retained EU Law Bill that set out to abolish more than 4,000 EU laws by 31 December.
However, Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch has now admitted to Conservative Brexiters that the majority of these laws will remain on the statute book. Only about 800 are now expected to be repealed by the end of the year.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What the papers say
The change of heart is the “latest Brexit betrayal”, said The Telegraph. A Tory MP told the paper that Badenoch is “a lame minister who is having rings run around her by ‘Remainer’ officials”.
“After the No. 10 games over the Windsor Framework”, this “just rubs further salt in the wounds,” a source from the pro-Brexit European Research Group told GB News. They added that “it sadly seems like the PM’s pledges are becoming increasingly meaningless.”
By contrast, the former British diplomat Alexandra Hall Hall welcomed the “common sense” decision. “Truly the revolution continues to devour its own,” she said on Twitter.
The “new approach” will be “welcomed by business and civil servants” who have been given the “huge task” of earmarking EU rules for repeal, said the Financial Times. The decision “will be seen as another sign of Sunak’s practical approach to EU issues”.
What next?
Under the Retained EU Law Bill – also known as the Brexit freedom bill – introduced during Liz Truss’s short reign as prime minister, the government had committed to repealing or replacing around 4,000 pieces of legislation tied to the UK’s membership of the EU, many to do with employment and environmental laws.
It was a mammoth task with a tight deadline – the government had given itself until the end of 2023 to decide which laws they wanted to scrap, retain or replace. Unless reinstated or replaced by the end of December, many of these EU laws would automatically lapse, a process known as “sunsetting”. However, Badenoch’s allies do not deny that ministers are planning to abandon that “sunset clause”.
The government is “expected to commit to retaining the most high-profile EU-derived laws, including the working-time directive and environmental legislation”, said The Times.
It is also likely that safety standards laws will be retained. Allies of Badenoch said she had asked the European Research Group to give examples of undesirable EU laws that they thought should be removed that were not already on the list of 800.
“The only thing they could come up with was product standards,” said a source. “She told them that as business secretary and as a mother that she thought that product standards were important.”
The consequences of the sunset clause could have been significant. Key employment laws could have been impacted or abolished, including the working time directive, which limits the average weekly working time to 48 hours. Concerns were also raised over what the bill could have meant for environmental protections.
However, Sunak had claimed that the scrapping of EU regulations would have unleashed an “£80 billion science funding boom”, said The Telegraph, and in a move that would have “delighted” former prime minister Winston Churchill, according to the Daily Express, champagne could once again have been sold in a pint bottle.
Nevertheless, the bill was never short of critics. A cross-party group of MPs has sought to rein in the powers of the bill.
“There has been concern about the way that the government is using Brexit as political cover to transfer power over thousands of areas of vital regulation from Parliament to Ministers from across Parliament – whether Labour, Tory, Leaver or Remainer, Lord or MP, we all agree it’s a terrible piece of legislation,” one of the MPs, Stella Creasy, told The New European.
Predicting a climbdown, earlier this month The Observer reported that “the extent of opposition to it from business, environmental groups, unions and Brussels” had “left ministers with no option but to consider delay, and moving to a scaled-down and less hurried version”.
“If we’re honest,” said London Playbook, “it was obvious to lots of people that a Brexit bonfire by 2024 was a highly unrealistic proposition” and Bloomberg reported in July that Lucy Frazer (then a Treasury minister) had recommended a deadline of 2026.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
5 hilariously spirited cartoons about the spirit of Christmas
Cartoons Artists take on excuses, pardons, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Inside the house of Assad
The Explainer Bashar al-Assad and his father, Hafez, ruled Syria for more than half a century but how did one family achieve and maintain power?
By The Week UK Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 22, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Will Starmer's Brexit reset work?
Today's Big Question PM will have to tread a fine line to keep Leavers on side as leaks suggest EU's 'tough red lines' in trade talks next year
By The Week UK Published
-
Why are lawmakers ringing the alarms about New Jersey's mysterious drones?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Unexplained lights in the night sky have residents of the Garden State on edge, and elected officials demanding answers
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Will Biden clear out death row before leaving office?
Today's Big Question Trump could oversee a 'wave of executions' otherwise
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
How will the rebels rule Syria?
Today's Big Question Fall of Assad regime is a 'historic opportunity' and a 'moment of huge peril' for country and region
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published
-
Could Trump use impoundment to skate around Congress?
Today's Big Question The incoming president could refuse to spend money allocated by the legislative branch
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Labour's plan for change: is Keir Starmer pulling a Rishi Sunak?
Today's Big Question New 'Plan for Change' calls to mind former PM's much maligned 'five priorities'
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
What will Trump's mass deportations look like?
Today's Big Question And will the public go along?
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published