Phubbing: a marriage-wrecking habit?
New study says couples are avoiding talking to each other by looking at their phones - but was it ever thus?

“Nigel Farage may be a lipless old populist with a face like a crapulent axolotl, but you can’t take away his bank account just because... Oi! Are you even listening? You’re not, are you? You’re playing with your damn phone like a teenager... There’s me trying to have an important topical conversation and you’re totally phubbing me.”
Phubbing – snubbing or ignoring someone while you look at your phone – was all over the papers last week, said Giles Coren in The Times, because of a new study showing that it’s bad for relationships. Researchers had interviewed 712 people, with an average age of 37, and found that couples who phub each other (always have their phones out, interrupt conversations to check messages, scroll through Instagram at mealtimes, watch YouTube videos in bed instead of having sex) experience “more conflict and less intimacy”.
‘Anything goes as long as expectations are aligned’
To which my response is, “Oh my god, look at this Reel of a dachshund throwing a tea party for all his dog friends!”, said Polly Vernon in the same paper. It’s fun when scientists confirm things we already know about the way we live; but I don’t agree with this study’s findings.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Phubbing has been going on for ages (the word was coined 11 years ago) and I don’t see that it has to be a marriage-wrecker. Surely it’s like sex: anything goes, provided your habits and expectations are aligned.
‘Couples have always found ways to avoid talking to each other’
I hate phubbing, but there are times when it can be acceptable, said Michael Hogan in The Guardian. Arriving early at a big meeting, say, there may be a tacit agreement that you can swerve the small talk; and even at a social gathering, a quick phub, well managed, can be forgivable. But generally, it’s just incredibly rude, with its implied message that the person you’re with is less interesting to you than your online friends or the latest Twitter spat.
Yet haven’t couples always found ways to avoid having to talk to each other, asked Jane Shilling in The Daily Telegraph. Before people could lose themselves in cat memes, didn’t they retreat to the golf club or the shed, sit glued to the cricket, hide behind a newspaper, or lavish attention on the dog? All these things could surely be as much the cause – or symptom – of a stressed marriage as a phubbing habit.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Panspermia: the theory that life was sent to Earth by aliens
Under The Radar New findings have resurfaced an old, controversial idea
-
What's a bridge loan and how could it make buying your next home possible?
The Explainer This type of loan has both pros and cons
-
The Week contest: Phone risk
Puzzles and Quizzes
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?
Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
GPT-5: Not quite ready to take over the world
Feature OpenAI rolls back its GPT-5 model after a poorly received launch
-
Broken brains: The social price of digital life
Feature A new study shows that smartphones and streaming services may be fueling a sharp decline in responsibility and reliability in adults
-
The Hermit Kingdom's laptop warriors
Feature American firms are unwittingly hiring IT workers with a second job—as North Korean operatives
-
Deep thoughts: AI shows its math chops
Feature Google's Gemini is the first AI system to win gold at the International Mathematical Olympiad
-
Palantir: The all-seeing tech giant
Feature Palantir's data-mining tools are used by spies and the military. Are they now being turned on Americans?
-
Intellectual property: AI gains at creators' expense
Feature Two federal judges ruled that it is fair use for AI firms to use copyrighted media to train bots
-
The first AI job cuts are already here
Feature Companies are removing entry-level jobs as AI takes over