The mystery of the sanction-busting plane that flew from Inverness to Moscow
Jet left Scottish airport after flights were banned between UK and Russia
A flight from Inverness to Moscow, which should have been prohibited by sanctions on Russia, was given the go-ahead by the government, the Scottish National Party has claimed.
The Estonian-registered private jet, operated by Panaviatic, took off on 26 February, two days after President Vladimir Putin ordered the Russian invasion of Ukraine. A Notice to Air Missions (NOTAMs) regulation, banning flights between the UK and Russia, was issued the day before the flight, which carried three people and cargo.
Initially, the Department for Transport blamed Inverness airport for the breach of the regulation, accusing it of disobeying the rule banning flights between the UK and Russia.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
However, a memo seen by the Press and Journal newspaper suggested that the UK government approved the flight, not the Highland aviation authorities. A transcript of national air traffic controls obtained by the paper suggested that Inverness airport crews were told there was “no reason to intervene” and block the flight.
But the SNP’s Westminster leader Ian Blackford and UK Transport Secretary Grant Shapps clashed over the issue.
Blackford claimed Highlands and Islands Airports (HIAL) was informed of the regulations 24 hours after they came into effect, and after the flight had departed. He called on Shapps to “tighten the restrictions” so there are not “loopholes that allow flights with a final destination of Moscow”.
However, Shapps hit back on Twitter, disputing the claim that HIAL had not been informed of the sanctions. “It is always the responsibility of Aviation to check NOTAMs before flight,” he wrote.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
The story gained wider attention this week when Richard Thomson of the SNP quizzed the prime minister about the flight at yesterday’s PMQs.
He asked Boris Johnson to “commit to informing the House at the earliest opportunity who was travelling on that flight” and to explain “why, despite being informed in advance of the flight, was no attempt made by the UK Government to keep the plane on the ground”.
Johnson replied that he did not know the answer but said “as soon as we can get some information about that, I will make sure that the House is properly informed”.
Previously, Scottish transport secretary Michael Matheson confirmed an order had been issued but said there was a “delay” in information being provided by the Civil Aviation Authority to airport operators.
Therefore, he argued, the flight had been given clearance by air traffic control service as “complying with the sanctions regime in place at that particular point”.
He continued: “So the proper procedures were followed at that particular point but clearly there are some areas where there is a lack of clarity around some aspects of the sanctions regime.”
The Press and Journal noted that a spokesman for Inverness airport has made a similar claim, saying the private jet departed prior to a notification from the Civil Aviation Authority being received at 7.15pm that day.
-
Proposed Trump-Putin talks in Budapest on holdSpeed Read Trump apparently has no concrete plans to meet with Putin for Ukraine peace talks
-
Trump demands millions from his administrationSpeed Read The president has requested $230 million in compensation from the Justice Department for previous federal investigations
-
The WW2 ‘massacre’ dividing Senegal and FranceUnder the Radar A new investigation found the 1944 Thiaroye attack on ‘unarmed’ African soldiers was ‘premeditated’, and far deadlier than previously recorded
-
The Baltic ‘bog belt’ plan to protect Europe from RussiaUnder the Radar Reviving lost wetland on Nato’s eastern flank would fuse ‘two European priorities that increasingly compete for attention and funding: defence and climate’
-
How should Nato respond to Putin’s incursions?Today’s big question Russia has breached Nato airspace regularly this month, and nations are primed to respond
-
What will bring Vladimir Putin to the negotiating table?Today’s Big Question With diplomatic efforts stalling, the US and EU turn again to sanctions as Russian drone strikes on Poland risk dramatically escalating conflict
-
The mission to demine UkraineThe Explainer An estimated quarter of the nation – an area the size of England – is contaminated with landmines and unexploded shells from the war
-
Ottawa Treaty: why are Russia's neighbours leaving anti-landmine agreement?Today's Big Question Ukraine to follow Poland, Finland, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia as Nato looks to build a new ‘Iron Curtain' of millions of landmines
-
How drone warfare worksThe Explainer From Ukraine to Iran, it has become clear that unmanned aircraft are rapidly revolutionising modern warfare
-
How long can Nato keep Donald Trump happy?Today's Big Question Military alliance pulls out all the stops to woo US president on his peacemaker victory lap
-
Are the UK and Russia already at war?Today's Big Question Moscow has long been on a 'menacing' war footing with London, says leading UK defence adviser