Why has Viktor Orbán declared a state of emergency over Ukraine?
Hungary ends Covid crisis measures – and ushers in new ones over Russia’s invasion
Viktor Orbán has declared a state of emergency in Hungary, introducing a wide-ranging windfall tax to combat a cost-of-living crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine.
The newly re-elected prime minister told MPs that the measures would give him the power to respond with “real guts” to the looming crisis. But he “resisted blaming” the emergency on his previously “close ally” Vladimir Putin, The Times said.
“The years between 2020 and 2030 will be a decade of dangers, uncertainty and war,” Orbán said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“In such an era, Hungary cannot afford the luxury of irresponsibility, disunity and weakness. This requires room for manoeuvre and immediate action.”
Era of the strongman
On the surface, the new measures are intended to ensure that Orbán and his government can “respond more quickly to challenges created by the war in neighboring Ukraine”, Politico reported.
They hand the prime minister direct power to “approve measures by decree”, a lever he described to MPs as being necessary to tackle the oncoming “economic crisis”.
He later announced a “windfall tax on all banks, insurers, telecoms, airlines and energy trading companies”, The Times reported, which will be used to create two “defence” funds to avoid “drastic price increases” and to strengthen the army “immediately”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
But critics said “the move will only serve to tighten Orbán’s grip on power”, Politico added, “threatening fundamental rights and diminishing the importance of parliament”.
The prime minister has sought to downplay these fears, telling MPs yesterday: “We have seen that the war and sanctions from Brussels have brought about a great economic upheaval and drastic price rises. The world is on the brink of an economic crisis.
“Hungary has to stay out of this war and has to protect the financial security of families,” he said, adding that the increased powers “will allow the government to react immediately and protect Hungary and Hungarian families by all possible means”.
Having governed Hungary since 2010, Orbán “enjoys almost complete control of his country’s political system”, The Economist reported.
In the April election in which he retained power, his party “held on to its two-thirds share of the seats in parliament, a super-majority that allows it to change the constitution at will”.
His warnings over “inflation and economic upheaval” as a result of the war in Ukraine are not necessarily misplaced, the paper added. But he “likes a crisis, so long as it lets him rule by decree”.
Uncertain territory
Missing from the crisis declaration was any recognition of “Russia’s guilt in launching the war”, The Economist said. But Orbán “is, by a long chalk, the most Russia-friendly leader in the EU”.
This close relationship has been borne out in Orbán’s refusal to discuss the EU’s proposal for an embargo on Russian oil at a summit of member states next week.
In what came as a “fresh blow to the union’s efforts to win backing for its landmark sanctions package”, the Financial Times reported that the Hungarian strongman wrote to European Council President Charles Michel outlining how his country “could not support the sanctions without more detail on the EU financing available to help Budapest”.
“Discussing the sanctions package at the level of leaders in the absence of a consensus would be counterproductive,” Orbán wrote in the letter seen by the paper. “It would only highlight our internal divisions without offering a realistic chance to resolve differences. Therefore, I propose not to address this issue at the next European Council.”
Orbán’s historically close relationship with Putin forced him to rethink his election messaging in the run-up to April’s vote.
His popularity has since been buoyed “by price caps and controls on food and energy”, The Times said. But the looming danger is that “these look increasingly unrealistic as costs soar due to supply disruption and the rising costs of energy”.
Home front
Orbán’s critics have been quick to hit back at the new state of emergency measures.
The Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC), a rights organisation, said in a statement that it provides “yet another carte blanche mandate” to override the parliament.
The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (TASZ) warned the state of emergency in Hungary “has become permanent”, a reference to emergency measures imposed during the Covid-19 crisis that were due to expire on 1 June.
Orbán is being handed “more leeway than usual” by the new measures, the group said, adding: “The government has already used the special legal order to achieve its own goals of power, and it was not driven by the desire to protect citizens.”
Having served as prime minister for more than a decade, Orbán’s government has “already been under EU scrutiny for democratic backsliding”, EU Observer said.
He “hardly seems to need more power”, The Economist added. But he has laid all of the groundwork to constantly “bypass parliamentary scrutiny” and “rule by decree”.
-
Will California's EV mandate survive Trump, SCOTUS challenge?
Today's Big Question The Golden State's climate goal faces big obstacles
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'Underneath the noise, however, there’s an existential crisis'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
2024: the year of distrust in science
In the Spotlight Science and politics do not seem to mix
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
State capture
Opinion We've seen this in other countries
By Susan Caskie Published
-
ATACMS: the long-range American missiles being fired by Ukraine
The Explainer President Joe Biden has authorized their use for the first time in the war
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine fires ATACMS, Russia ups hybrid war
Speed Read Ukraine shot U.S.-provided long-range missiles and Russia threatened retaliation
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Can Europe pick up the slack in Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Trump's election raises questions about what's next in the war
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Biden allows Ukraine to hit deep in Russia
Speed Read The U.S. gave Ukraine the green light to use ATACMS missiles supplied by Washington, a decision influenced by Russia's escalation of the war with North Korean troops
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
What does the G20 summit say about the new global order?
Today's Big Question Donald Trump's election ushers in era of 'transactional' geopolitics that threatens to undermine international consensus
By Elliott Goat, The Week UK Published