Why has Viktor Orbán declared a state of emergency over Ukraine?
Hungary ends Covid crisis measures – and ushers in new ones over Russia’s invasion

Viktor Orbán has declared a state of emergency in Hungary, introducing a wide-ranging windfall tax to combat a cost-of-living crisis triggered by the war in Ukraine.
The newly re-elected prime minister told MPs that the measures would give him the power to respond with “real guts” to the looming crisis. But he “resisted blaming” the emergency on his previously “close ally” Vladimir Putin, The Times said.
“The years between 2020 and 2030 will be a decade of dangers, uncertainty and war,” Orbán said.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
“In such an era, Hungary cannot afford the luxury of irresponsibility, disunity and weakness. This requires room for manoeuvre and immediate action.”
Era of the strongman
On the surface, the new measures are intended to ensure that Orbán and his government can “respond more quickly to challenges created by the war in neighboring Ukraine”, Politico reported.
They hand the prime minister direct power to “approve measures by decree”, a lever he described to MPs as being necessary to tackle the oncoming “economic crisis”.
He later announced a “windfall tax on all banks, insurers, telecoms, airlines and energy trading companies”, The Times reported, which will be used to create two “defence” funds to avoid “drastic price increases” and to strengthen the army “immediately”.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
But critics said “the move will only serve to tighten Orbán’s grip on power”, Politico added, “threatening fundamental rights and diminishing the importance of parliament”.
The prime minister has sought to downplay these fears, telling MPs yesterday: “We have seen that the war and sanctions from Brussels have brought about a great economic upheaval and drastic price rises. The world is on the brink of an economic crisis.
“Hungary has to stay out of this war and has to protect the financial security of families,” he said, adding that the increased powers “will allow the government to react immediately and protect Hungary and Hungarian families by all possible means”.
Having governed Hungary since 2010, Orbán “enjoys almost complete control of his country’s political system”, The Economist reported.
In the April election in which he retained power, his party “held on to its two-thirds share of the seats in parliament, a super-majority that allows it to change the constitution at will”.
His warnings over “inflation and economic upheaval” as a result of the war in Ukraine are not necessarily misplaced, the paper added. But he “likes a crisis, so long as it lets him rule by decree”.
Uncertain territory
Missing from the crisis declaration was any recognition of “Russia’s guilt in launching the war”, The Economist said. But Orbán “is, by a long chalk, the most Russia-friendly leader in the EU”.
This close relationship has been borne out in Orbán’s refusal to discuss the EU’s proposal for an embargo on Russian oil at a summit of member states next week.
In what came as a “fresh blow to the union’s efforts to win backing for its landmark sanctions package”, the Financial Times reported that the Hungarian strongman wrote to European Council President Charles Michel outlining how his country “could not support the sanctions without more detail on the EU financing available to help Budapest”.
“Discussing the sanctions package at the level of leaders in the absence of a consensus would be counterproductive,” Orbán wrote in the letter seen by the paper. “It would only highlight our internal divisions without offering a realistic chance to resolve differences. Therefore, I propose not to address this issue at the next European Council.”
Orbán’s historically close relationship with Putin forced him to rethink his election messaging in the run-up to April’s vote.
His popularity has since been buoyed “by price caps and controls on food and energy”, The Times said. But the looming danger is that “these look increasingly unrealistic as costs soar due to supply disruption and the rising costs of energy”.
Home front
Orbán’s critics have been quick to hit back at the new state of emergency measures.
The Hungarian Helsinki Committee (HHC), a rights organisation, said in a statement that it provides “yet another carte blanche mandate” to override the parliament.
The Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (TASZ) warned the state of emergency in Hungary “has become permanent”, a reference to emergency measures imposed during the Covid-19 crisis that were due to expire on 1 June.
Orbán is being handed “more leeway than usual” by the new measures, the group said, adding: “The government has already used the special legal order to achieve its own goals of power, and it was not driven by the desire to protect citizens.”
Having served as prime minister for more than a decade, Orbán’s government has “already been under EU scrutiny for democratic backsliding”, EU Observer said.
He “hardly seems to need more power”, The Economist added. But he has laid all of the groundwork to constantly “bypass parliamentary scrutiny” and “rule by decree”.
-
5 tactically sound cartoons about the leaked Signal chat
Cartoons Artists take on the clown signal, baby steps, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Roast lamb shoulder with ginger and fresh turmeric recipe
The Week Recommends Succulent and tender and falls off the bone with ease
By The Week UK Published
-
Adolescence and the toxic online world: what's the solution?
Talking Point The hit Netflix show is a window into the manosphere, red pills and incels
By The Week Staff Published
-
Did Vladimir Putin just play Donald Trump?
Today's Big Question The Russian president rejected a full ceasefire after long conversation with his US counterpart
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
U.S. aid resumes as Ukraine agrees to cease-fire
Feature As Trump pressures Ukraine, NATO and European allies weigh new strategies
By The Week US Published
-
Norway's windfall: should it go to Ukraine?
Talking Point Oil-based wealth fund is intended 'for future generations of Norwegians', but Putin's war poses an existential threat
By The Week UK Published
-
How feasible is a Ukraine ceasefire?
Today's Big Question Kyiv has condemned Putin's 'manipulative' response to proposed agreement
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Ukraine agrees to ceasefire, ending US aid freeze
Speed Read Kyiv made peace with the Trump administration by agreeing to an immediate ceasefire in its war against Russian invaders
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The fallout of Trump's halt on military aid for Ukraine
Feature European leaders push for a cease-fire to mend U.S.-Ukraine ties
By The Week US Published
-
Trump pauses Ukraine intelligence sharing
Speed Read The decision is intended to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy into peace negotiations with Vladimir Putin
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Has Starmer put Britain back on the world stage?
Talking Point UK takes leading role in Europe on Ukraine and Starmer praised as credible 'bridge' with the US under Trump
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published