It's the legislation, stupid!


After the Democrats' abortion bill failed in the Senate yet again, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) made an odd comment. "I believe in democracy, and I don't believe the minority should have the ability to block things that the majority wants to do," she said. That's not in the Constitution… It's time to get rid of the filibuster."
It's technically true that the expansive abortion bill failed on a cloture vote and therefore was filibustered. But the legislation failed 51 to 49. It did not garner majority support, as opposed to simply not meeting a 60-vote procedural threshold. It would have been defeated on the Senate floor even if the filibuster was somehow eliminated.
Moreover, as has happened on a number of issues, Democrats chose to push a maximalist bill that checked all the activist boxes rather than legislation that could have won enough bipartisan support to exceed 50 votes. While the abortion measure was sold as codifying Roe v. Wade as the Supreme Court seems on the verge of overturning it, its provisions went far beyond the policies that precedent permitted. A bill that really did limit itself to codifying Roe could have gotten Sens. Susan Collins (R-Maine) and Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), both pro-choice, to vote for it, and ostensibly Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.), too.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Yes, that more modest bill still would have failed. But then it would really have been due to the supermajority requirements of the filibuster, and it would have been a bipartisan majority of 52 senators.
The Democrats' democratic absolutism is largely opportunistic. You cannot talk about the Senate being undemocratic because your party's senators represent more people — a deliberate part of the constitutional design without which the country as we know it would likely not even exist — while pushing an overreaching abortion policy favored only by 19 percent of the country. The filibuster, the Electoral College and the makeup of the Senate only became a problem for liberals because they now command less popular support than they did in the New Deal/Great Society eras.
And that brings us back to the filibuster, a subject about which Democrats may reverse themselves yet again after November. The Democrats' problem is that they barely won the Senate and are dependent on the votes of their most conservative lawmakers, yet they are trying to legislate as if they enjoyed supermajorities. That's not on procedures, or even the GOP.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
W. James Antle III is the politics editor of the Washington Examiner, the former editor of The American Conservative, and author of Devouring Freedom: Can Big Government Ever Be Stopped?.
-
Are inflatable costumes and naked bike rides helping or hurting ICE protests?
Talking Points Trump administration efforts to portray Portland and Chicago as dystopian war zones have been met with dancing frogs, bare butts and a growing movement to mock MAGA doomsaying
-
Shutdown: Are Democrats fighting the right battle?
Feature Democrats are holding firm on health insurance subsidies as Trump ramps up the pain by freezing funding and vowing to cut more jobs
-
Could Democrats lose the New Jersey governor’s race?
Today’s Big Question Democrat Mikie Sherrill stumbles against Republican Jack Ciattarelli
-
Gaza peace deal: why did Trump succeed where Biden failed?
Today's Big Question As the first stage of a ceasefire begins, Trump’s unique ‘just-get-it-done’ attitude may have proven pivotal to negotiations
-
‘Every argument has a rational, emotional and rhetorical component’
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Why is this government shutdown so consequential?
Today's Big Question Federal employee layoffs could be in the thousands
-
Shutdown: Democrats stand firm, at a cost
Feature With Trump refusing to negotiate, Democrats’ fight over health care could push the government toward a shutdown
-
Trump’s plan for a government shutdown: mass firings
IN THE SPOTLIGHT As lawmakers scramble to avoid a shutdown, the White House is making plans for widespread layoffs that could lead to a permanent federal downsizing