Australia's Indigenous Voice referendum: a country forever divided?

Australians are pondering an uncertain future after voters overwhelmingly rejected the "Voice" – a referendum on giving greater political rights to Indigenous people.

The proposal, to recognise Indigenous Australians in the constitution and create a body of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people to advise government, was rejected by a margin of 60.78% to 39.22%.

Public servants in Queensland were offered five days' paid leave for psychological distress caused by the result, noted Yahoo News, and Australian Indigenous leaders called for a week of silence and reflection.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

Following a fraught and often bitter campaign, it is now "up to both sides to try and bring a divided nation back together again", said Daily Mail Australia. Some feel this will not be easy.

'More divided than ever'

The debates "exposed racial fault lines" and prompted a "bitter culture war" in a country that has "long struggled to reckon with its colonial legacy", said The New York Times. The campaign "was like a sieve shaking out all of our ugly nuances", Ken Lechleitner Pangarte, an Aboriginal consultant, told The Washington Post.

Speaking at an Aboriginal event 24 hours after the result, Aboriginal elder Vincent Forrester said voters "kicked us in the guts". He called on his audience to "show the world that Australia is a racist country".

Bishops have said the vote left Australia "more divided than ever", reported The Tablet, a Catholic weekly paper. The Archbishop of Brisbane, Mark Coleridge, said: "It's ironic that a process supposed to unite the nation has done just the opposite."

Last Saturday could have been "a day of celebration and of unity", wrote Caroline Di Russo, a lawyer, for Sky News Australia. But instead it leaves a country that is "sad and divided", and "the most tragic thing is that it didn't have to be this way".

A "brutal" press campaign has been criticised. The result was not an example of "predictable, full-blown Aussie racism", argued novelist Thomas Keneally for The Guardian, because polls were initially "favourable to the idea". But then "grotesque" media stories and "fantastical propositions about what the powers of the [proposed Indigenous] body would be" turned the tide, he added.

Therefore, unity is a long way off, said Professor Marcia Langton, a leading "Yes" campaigner and architect of the Indigenous voice. Speaking to NITV, she said: "It will be at least two generations before Australians are capable of putting their colonial hatreds behind them and acknowledging that we exist,", adding that "reconciliation is dead".

'Division beaten by optimism'

But supporters of the "No" campaign have argued that the outcome is a boost for unity. The referendum saw "division beaten by optimism", argued Fraser Nelson in The Telegraph.

Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, an Aboriginal politician who led the "No" campaign, gave a "masterclass in how to respond to identity politics", said Nelson. Her tone was not "angry", he believed, but "humorous and optimistic", emphasising "social cohesion".

The Voice was rejected because it would have "permanently divided our nation" by "providing different rights to different Australians based on their race", wrote Daniel Wild for The Spectator Australia.

"There is far more that unites us as Australians than divides us," added Wild, so "the fault is not with those who voted Yes, but with the elites in Canberra and our capital cities, and activists who put our nation through this divisive, unnecessary, and avoidable process".

Noting that the majority of respondents in polls supported the Voice consistently for the past five years, the political editor of The Sydney Morning Herald, Peter Hartcher, said the result did not necessarily reflect deep-seated division but more a short-term reaction to the campaign. "Many Indigenous Australians will take this personally," he wrote, but "they shouldn't" because "it's just politics".

What "both sides can agree on" is their "relief that this bruising campaign is over", said the BBC. Going forward, there have been suggestions, including from opposition leader Peter Dutton, of a second referendum that recognises Indigenous people in the constitution, but doesn't create an advisory body.