House panel subpoenas Bondi over Epstein files

TOPSHOT - US Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on "Oversight of the Department of Justice" on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on February 11, 2026. Congressional Democrats accused US Attorney General Pam Bondi of engaging in a "cover-up" of the Jeffrey Epstein files and turning the Justice Department into a weapon of retribution for President Donald Trump. Bondi, testifying before the House Judiciary Committee, defended the department's handling of the records about the convicted sex offender at a fiery hearing attended by a number of Epstein's victims. (Photo by ROBERTO SCHMIDT / AFP via Getty Images) — Attorney General Pam Bondi testifies before a House Judiciary Committee hearing

(Image credit: Roberto Schmidt / AFP / Getty Images)

What happened

The Republican-led House Oversight Committee on Wednesday voted to subpoena Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Justice Department’s handling of its Jeffrey Epstein investigation. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-S.C.), who introduced the motion, and four other Republicans joined all of the committee’s Democrats in the 24-19 vote to compel Bondi to testify under oath.

Who said what

The five GOP defections “amounted to a sharp rebuke of Bondi,” The Associated Press said, and underscored the “continued frustration among conservatives” about her compliance with a bipartisan law compelling the release of all DOJ files on Epstein. Being deposed could force Bondi to “contend more seriously with lawmakers’ questions” than at congressional hearings, where she might “perform for live television cameras and fall back on prepared talking points,” The New York Times said.

Bondi “has been instrumental in orchestrating the White House’s cover-up of the Epstein files” for months, said California Rep. Robert Garcia, the committee’s top Democrat. Bondi “claims the DOJ has released all of the Epstein files,” Mace said on social media, but “the record is clear: they have not.” The Justice Department said Wednesday that 47,635 Epstein files “were offline for further review,” and those missing documents include FBI notes on interviews with a woman who alleged that both Epstein and President Donald Trump sexually assaulted her in the 1980s when she was a minor, according to The Wall Street Journal.

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

What next?

Complying with congressional subpoenas “is not optional,” but “several past attorneys general” have refused, The Washington Post said. And it’s up to the DOJ to “prosecute any contempt charges recommended by Congress” for rejecting subpoenas.

Explore More

Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.