How is Labour going to change the UK?
Prime Minister Keir Starmer will be expected to make an immediate impact as his party takes power
Labour has won the general election by a landslide and will now form a government with a significant majority. But expectations will be high on the party and the new prime minister, Keir Starmer, to deliver on their manifesto promises.
In his victory speech, Starmer said that "change begins now" and that his government would introduce a period of "national renewal". He will want to "set the tone" with some "eye-catching announcements" in the early days of its tenure, said The Guardian.
But how exactly will Starmer's Labour change Britain and what will the new government do in its first days in office?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
While some "observers" will be "tempted" to say Labour's victory is "a new dawn in British politics", in reality its "challenges in government have only just begun", said Time. It can "claim a base" of support that "spans north and south, urban and rural, deprived and affluent", but "balancing" and "maintaining" that diverse support will be a "challenge".
It is certain that Starmer will "take early action on several issues" to demonstrate the change he has insisted he will make, though it will be hard to make real improvements, said The Times.
The "immediate policy priorities" will include the Rwanda deportation scheme, which will be "axed" straight away and replaced with a "border security command", said The Telegraph. The prime minister will also "kickstart reforms to the planning system" to try to "ramp up" housebuilding.
Labour's "first priority", said Sky News, will be to "deliver economic stability" as Britons continue to face the cost of living crisis. But new chancellor Rachel Reeves is likely to stick to the "strict fiscal rules" the outgoing government already had in place.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
There will also be early efforts on "tackling anti-social behaviour" and attempting to "cut NHS waiting lists", while the party is expected to quickly begin trying to recruit more teachers as part of its "reforms for education".
However, many of the policies will still not be "developed enough for the civil service to act on immediately", said Tom Belger in The Guardian. And while it will try to "sound like it means business" in its first 100 days, Labour will find it tough to find the balance "between promising to meet high public expectations of change" and "dampening" them because of the fiscal rules it has put in place.
What next?
The key to Starmer's long-term success will be to fix the "chronic low productivity and raise the efficiency of the British state", as well as maintaining "continued discipline and a mandate to pursue growth", said The Economist. There is a chance he "concludes he should be cautious precisely when he should be bold" over fears of losing the support of his broad and diverse mandate, but Labour needs to stick to its "stated priority" of boosting productivity.
Conversely, the new prime minister would be "wise not to be complacent" about remaining in power for the long term, said Politico. Given overall vote share has remained relatively static for Labour, there are concerns that it is the "devastating capacity" of Reform UK to take votes from the Conservatives that has helped Starmer into No. 10.
If Starmer "fails to bring about the change and improve voters’ lives as he promises", then it will raise the question of "who will Reform voters punish" in the next election?
Richard Windsor is a freelance writer for The Week Digital. He began his journalism career writing about politics and sport while studying at the University of Southampton. He then worked across various football publications before specialising in cycling for almost nine years, covering major races including the Tour de France and interviewing some of the sport’s top riders. He led Cycling Weekly’s digital platforms as editor for seven of those years, helping to transform the publication into the UK’s largest cycling website. He now works as a freelance writer, editor and consultant.
-
Employees are branching out rather than moving up with career minimalismThe explainer From career ladder to lily pad
-
‘It is their greed and the pollution from their products that hurt consumers’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Jane Austen lives on at these timeless hotelsThe Week Recommends Here’s where to celebrate the writing legend’s 250th birthday
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
Are Republicans going to do a deal on health care?Today's Big Question Obamacare subsidies are expiring soon
-
The launch of Your Party: how it could workThe Explainer Despite landmark decisions made over the party’s makeup at their first conference, core frustrations are ‘likely to only intensify in the near-future’
-
What does the fall in net migration mean for the UK?Today’s Big Question With Labour and the Tories trying to ‘claim credit’ for lower figures, the ‘underlying picture is far less clear-cut’
-
Will Chuck Schumer keep his job?Today's Big Question Democrats are discontented and pointing a finger at the Senate leader
-
Why are China and Japan fighting over Taiwan?Today's Big Question Comments on Taiwan draw Beijing's rebuke
-
Asylum hotels: everything you need to knowThe Explainer Using hotels to house asylum seekers has proved extremely unpopular. Why, and what can the government do about it?
-
How are these Epstein files so damaging to Trump?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As Republicans and Democrats release dueling tranches of Epstein-related documents, the White House finds itself caught in a mess partially of its own making