Should MPs be banned from betting?
Pressure is growing for action but some commentators argue the media outrage is 'confected'

A senior Conservative has been accused of placing an £8,000 bet that he would lose his Westminster seat.
Philip Davies, who is defending a 6,242-vote majority in Shipley, West Yorkshire, at the general election, told The Sun that the sum involved was "nobody's business", that he "fully expected to lose" the seat and that he had done nothing illegal.
A string of MPs are being investigated by the Gambling Commission and there are growing calls for the rules to be tightened or for MPs to be banned from betting completely.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
Concern over gambling on politics has been around since betting shops were legalised in the 1960s, said Politics Home. From then bookmaker William Hill worried that "it could become an evil if sensational reports of the odds were published" and "it could sway public opinion and make people vote according to their stake instead of according to their conviction".
Insider betting, which is what the Conservatives currently being investigated by the Gambling Commission are accused of, is already illegal. But there have now been calls for MPs to be banned from betting entirely.
Iain Duncan Smith, the former Tory party leader and deputy chair of the all-parliamentary group on gambling-related harm, said MPs shouldn't bet on politics, because politics is "what we do" and "betting on it shows a disregard for the seriousness" of it. Tory MP Tobias Ellwood told BBC Radio 4’s "Today" that we should "prevent any current politician or party professional from placing any bets in the future".
Asked by Times Radio whether politicians should "just be banned" from placing bets, Mel Stride, the work and pensions secretary, replied: "Yeah, quite possibly, and I think we do need to have a debate about it."
This suggestion "would have looked absurd two weeks ago and is still absurd now", said Henry Hill on Conservative Home. "Any comparison with sport is spurious" as "there is no evidence that politicians are deliberately trying to lose races to win bets", and there is "no even theoretical misalignment of incentives if they bet on themselves to win". So any new regulation would "just be a press-management strategy", designed to "make this story go away by assuring the newspapers that something has been done".
The debate has "ballooned into an unhelpful and unnecessary war on politicians betting altogether", said William Atkinson in The Spectator, with "confected" media outrage "whipped up" against a "harmless habit". "Ill-tempered moralism" is "never a good position from which to legislate, regulate, or investigate", so "those getting on their high horses" about political betting "should be careful not to crucify a long-standing and inoffensive bit of fun" in a "media witch-hunt".
Speaking to the Financial Times, Anthony Pickles, assistant professor in social anthropology at the University of Birmingham, said it would be very difficult to define any ban's limits. "Should unpaid political advisers be barred from political gambling? What about newspaper columnists?" he asked.
What next?
Five Conservatives are being investigated by the Gambling Commission, the industry regulator, for placing election bets, but "reports suggest the number of politicians involved is much higher", said the London Evening Standard.
Rishi Sunak said "the integrity" of that investigation "should be respected", but "what I can tell you is, if anyone is found to have broken the rules, not only should they face the full consequences of the law, I will make sure that they are booted out of the Conservative Party".
A Labour candidate has also been suspended by the party after betting against himself, with the Gambling Commission also launching an investigation into him. The outcome of the various investigations will go a long way to determining whether a full ban will be imposed.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
How does the EPA plan to invalidate a core scientific finding?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Administrator Lee Zeldin says he's 'driving a dagger into the heart of the climate change religion.' But is his plan to undermine a key Obama-era greenhouse gas emissions policy scientifically sound — or politically feasible?
-
Why is the Democratic Party's favorability rating so low?
Talking Points Voters do not like Republican policies. They like Democrats even less.
-
Knives come out for Pam Bondi
IN THE SPOTLIGHT She wasn't Trump's first pick to lead the Justice Department. After months of scandals and setbacks, is the attorney general's MAGA shelf life winding down?
-
Are we facing a summer of riots?
Today's Big Question Anti-immigrant unrest in Essex has sparked fears of a summer of disorder
-
Who stands to gain – and lose – from 16-year-old voters?
Today's Big Question Many assume Labour will benefit but move could 'backfire' if Greens, a new hard-left party or Reform continue to pick up momentum
-
'For frequent travelers, the costs add up'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
A Democratic election in Arizona is a microcosm of the party's infighting
The Explainer The top three candidates are fighting it out for a special election seat
-
Mortgage reform: is Rachel Reeves betting the house on City rules shake-up?
Today's Big Question Reforms could create up to 36,000 additional mortgages next year