Supreme Court gives Trump 2 deportation wins
The court ruled that the Trump administration could continue to deport Venezuelan migrants


What happened
The Supreme Court Monday intervened in two immigration cases, handing partial wins to President Donald Trump. In one case, Chief Justice John Roberts paused a federal judge's order that the Trump administration immediately retrieve a migrant erroneously deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. In the other, the court ruled 5-4 that the administration could resume deportations of Venezuelans to the same Salvadoran prison using Trump's claimed wartime powers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, with new limits.
Who said what
The divided Supreme Court handed Trump a "victory," but in a "narrow procedural ruling" in which all nine justices agreed the Venezuelan alleged gang members had the right to challenge their deportation in court, The New York Times said. "The split among the court was over where — and how — that should happen," and the five conservatives in the majority ruled it had to happen in Texas, where the Venezuelans are being detained, not the Washington, D.C., court that blocked the deportations.
"Courts in Texas may not be especially receptive" to the detainees' habeas corpus petitions, Politico said. Still, the Supreme Court's ruling "appears to deal a setback to Trump's attempt to swiftly deport" the alleged gang members and gave them the right to challenge his novel "interpretation" of the Alien Enemies Act to cover gang activity. Trump and the ACLU, which challenged the deportations, both claimed victory Monday night.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Roberts issued his "administrative stay" in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia before a midnight deadline set by a federal judge in Maryland for the Trump administration to "facilitate and effectuate" his return. Hours earlier, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals had rejected the administration's request to lift the order. The government "has no legal authority to snatch a person who is lawfully present in the United States off the street and remove him from the country without due process," two of the judges wrote.
What next?
Roberts ordered both sides in the Abrego Garcia case to submit their filings Wednesday, a "truncated timeline" that "indicates the Supreme Court is likely to act quickly," The Washington Post said.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
Trump twists House GOP arms on megabill
speed read The bill will provide a $350 billion boost to military and anti-immigration spending and 'cuts to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy programs'
-
Trump DOJ said to pay $5M to family of Jan. 6 rioter
speed read The US will pay a hefty sum to the family of Capitol rioter Ashli Babbitt, who was fatally shot on January 6
-
Trump DOJ charging House Democrat in ICE fracas
speed read Rep. LaMonica McIver is being charged with assault over a clash outside an immigration detention facility in Newark
-
The horse racing industry is caught up in the migrant debate
Under the Radar At least 78% of the workers on race tracks are reportedly immigrants
-
Biden diagnosed with aggressive prostate cancer
speed read The diagnosis hits close to home, as the former president 'dedicated much of his later career to cancer research'
-
Supreme Court weighs court limits amid birthright ban
speed read President Trump's bid to abolish birthright citizenship has sparked questions among federal judges about blocking administration policies
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
Gabbard fires intelligence chiefs after Venezuela report
speed read Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has fired the top two officials leading the National Intelligence Council