Supreme Court gives Trump 2 deportation wins
The court ruled that the Trump administration could continue to deport Venezuelan migrants


What happened
The Supreme Court Monday intervened in two immigration cases, handing partial wins to President Donald Trump. In one case, Chief Justice John Roberts paused a federal judge's order that the Trump administration immediately retrieve a migrant erroneously deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. In the other, the court ruled 5-4 that the administration could resume deportations of Venezuelans to the same Salvadoran prison using Trump's claimed wartime powers under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, with new limits.
Who said what
The divided Supreme Court handed Trump a "victory," but in a "narrow procedural ruling" in which all nine justices agreed the Venezuelan alleged gang members had the right to challenge their deportation in court, The New York Times said. "The split among the court was over where — and how — that should happen," and the five conservatives in the majority ruled it had to happen in Texas, where the Venezuelans are being detained, not the Washington, D.C., court that blocked the deportations.
"Courts in Texas may not be especially receptive" to the detainees' habeas corpus petitions, Politico said. Still, the Supreme Court's ruling "appears to deal a setback to Trump's attempt to swiftly deport" the alleged gang members and gave them the right to challenge his novel "interpretation" of the Alien Enemies Act to cover gang activity. Trump and the ACLU, which challenged the deportations, both claimed victory Monday night.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Roberts issued his "administrative stay" in the case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia before a midnight deadline set by a federal judge in Maryland for the Trump administration to "facilitate and effectuate" his return. Hours earlier, a unanimous three-judge panel of the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals had rejected the administration's request to lift the order. The government "has no legal authority to snatch a person who is lawfully present in the United States off the street and remove him from the country without due process," two of the judges wrote.
What next?
Roberts ordered both sides in the Abrego Garcia case to submit their filings Wednesday, a "truncated timeline" that "indicates the Supreme Court is likely to act quickly," The Washington Post said.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Peter has worked as a news and culture writer and editor at The Week since the site's launch in 2008. He covers politics, world affairs, religion and cultural currents. His journalism career began as a copy editor at a financial newswire and has included editorial positions at The New York Times Magazine, Facts on File, and Oregon State University.
-
How will Trump's megabill affect you?
Today's Big Question Republicans have passed the 'big, beautiful bill' through Congress
-
Scientists are the latest 'refugees'
In the spotlight Brain drain to brain gain
-
5 dreamy books to dive into this July
The Week Recommends A 'politically charged' collection of essays, historical fiction goes sci-fi and more
-
Judge blocks Trump's asylum ban at US border
Speed Read The president violated federal law by shutting down the US-Mexico border to asylum seekers, said the ruling
-
Thai court suspends prime minister over leaked call
Speed Read Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra has been suspended, pending an ethics investigation
-
Senate passes GOP megabill after Alaska side deal
The pivotal yes vote came from Sen. Lisa Murkowski, whose support was secured following negotiated side deals for her home state Alaska
-
U.S. v. Skrmetti: Did the trans rights movement overreach?
Feature The Supreme Court upholds a Tennessee law that bans transgender care for minors, dealing a blow to trans rights
-
How would the Trump administration denaturalize immigrant citizens?
Today's Big Question Using civil courts lowers the burden of proof
-
Trump sues LA over immigration policies
Speed Read He is suing over the city's sanctuary law, claiming it prevents local law enforcement from cooperating with federal immigration authorities
-
Obama, Bush and Bono eulogize USAID on final day
Speed Read The US Agency for International Development, a humanitarian organization, has been gutted by the Trump administration
-
Are masked ICE agents America's new secret police?
Today's Big Question Critics say masks undermine trust in law enforcement