What happened
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed California to use its newly redrawn congressional map in this year’s midterm elections. There were no dissents in the brief emergency docket order, which rejected a “last-ditch plea from state Republicans and the Trump administration” to reject the voter-approved redistricting plan, The Associated Press said.
Who said what
California’s new map is “designed to flip up to five seats now held by Republicans, part of a tit-for-tat nationwide redistricting battle spurred by President Donald Trump,” the AP said. Wednesday’s ruling came two months after the Supreme Court “cleared the way for the Texas map” that “kicked off” the “gerrymandering fight,” NPR said. With both maps upheld, “the end result is that the two states may essentially cancel out each other’s partisan gains.”
“Donald Trump said he was ‘entitled’ to five more congressional seats in Texas,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) said on social media. “He started this redistricting war. He lost, and he’ll lose again in November.”
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Latest Videos From
What next?
Legal battles are “still playing out over other new congressional maps,” NPR said. GOP-led Florida and Democratic-led Maryland have both taken steps to “join the list of states that have redistricted before the midterms.” Republicans are challenging new court-ordered Democratic-leaning districts in New York and Utah, and Virginia’s top court Wednesday agreed to adjudicate a challenge to that state’s proposed Democratic gerrymander. The California ruling also “served as a reminder” that the Supreme Court has “yet to rule on a broader challenge” to a Voting Rights Act provision that considers race in redistricting, The New York Times said.
