Texas' abortion travel bans face a constitutional challenge
Conservative activists say they want to stop 'abortion trafficking.' But is there a right to travel?


It is no longer legal to drive through some parts of Texas on the way to an out-of-state abortion.
The Guardian reported that commissioners in Lubbock County on Monday approved a measure "to ban people from transporting others along local roads for abortions." (Abortion, of course, is already illegal in the state.) Supporters of the effort say that such journeys amount to "abortion trafficking." "This ordinance fully supports the belief that unborn children are human beings and that they deserve the right to life," said lawyer Jonathan Mitchell, who helped devise the ordinance.
Lubbock County is just the biggest — and latest — Texas community to put a travel ban in place. The Associated Press reported the campaign has been underway since 2019, with critics painting the bans as "an effort to intimidate women from seeking abortions in places where it remains legal." The measures ostensibly penalize only people providing transportation, not pregnant women, but it remains a real question whether the new laws are actually enforceable. "We haven't had this kind of issue tested," said one law professor.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Expect challenges. "People have a right to travel — like, for any reason," Charlie Hughes of the Texas Equal Access Fund told the Dallas Observer. (Indeed, abortion rates are still rising nationally despite widespread abortion bans in red states since the end of Roe v. Wade last year.) For some critics, the new measures conjure up startling possibilities: "Instead of 'stop and frisk,' are police going to direct cars with fertile-looking passengers to pull over for a 'pee to flee'?"
'Effectively take someone hostage'
Advocates for the travel ban say it's not actually a travel ban. Another ordinance — this one in Cochran County — "does not interfere with the right to travel," Mark Dickson of Right to Life East Texas told Texas Scorecard, a conservative website. It merely imposes penalties on those who "traffic pregnant mothers across state lines for the purpose of an abortion." The ordinance is patterned after the federal Mann Act, a 20th-century law used to prosecute the sexual trafficking of minors.
The new laws are "unconstitutional," Ian Milhiser argued at Vox. The Supreme Court has long held that states "may not impose even fairly insignificant barriers on U.S. citizens who wish to travel outside that state." It thus follows that Texas communities "may not effectively take someone hostage for months" during their pregnancy. As for the Mann Act comparisons: "The Constitution gives Congress, and not state or local governments, exclusive authority over interstate commerce."
Not so fast, countered Hannah Rahim, writing for The Petrie-Flom Center for Health Law Policy, Biotechnology, and Bioethics at Harvard Law. There are some precedents that suggest the Constitution "does not clearly prohibit" states from banning abortion travel. Relying on a right to travel is "problematic." Texas isn't keeping anybody from leaving the state: It's just requiring them to "still abide by the home state's restrictions on abortion" when they go on the road. That doesn't mean such laws are wise, though. "There are powerful normative reasons for prohibiting states from banning abortion travel."
'A deep breath'
There are some skeptics of the new ordinances in the anti-abortion movement. World, a conservative Christian news site, reported that one doubter is Paul Linton, special counsel for Texas Alliance for Life. He said a travel ban "in large measure, is unconstitutional" because of the right to travel. Then again, it's not clear whom pro-choice groups might sue in order to overturn the ordinances: Like the state's abortion ban, the travel bans are designed to be enforced not by government officials but by private individuals suing in civil courts.
Another set of skeptics: The leaders of Amarillo, another "majority conservative" community in the northern part of the state. The Texas Tribune reported that the Amarillo City Council on Tuesday "took a deep breath" and put the brakes on a proposed abortion travel ban in that community. One resident, Keely Wilson, told the council the ban would scare people away from the city. "If people believe they can be targeted, harassed, investigated or sued by Amarillo residents," she said, "they will be much less likely to drive through or stop here."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Joel Mathis is a writer with 30 years of newspaper and online journalism experience. His work also regularly appears in National Geographic and The Kansas City Star. His awards include best online commentary at the Online News Association and (twice) at the City and Regional Magazine Association.
-
Deportations ensnare migrant families, U.S. citizens
Feature Trump's deportation crackdown is sweeping up more than just immigrants as ICE targets citizens, judges and nursing mothers
-
Trump shrugs off warnings over trade war costs
Feature Trump's tariffs are spiraling the U.S. toward an economic crisis as shipments slow down—and China doesn't plan to back down
-
A newly created gasoline giant in the Americas could change the industry landscape
The Explainer Sunoco and Parkland are two of the biggest fuel suppliers in the US and Canada, respectively
-
Trump judge bars deportations under 1798 law
speed read A Trump appointee has ruled that the president's use of a wartime act for deportations is illegal
-
RFK Jr.: A public-health wrecking ball
Feature Robert F. Kennedy Jr. doubles down on anti-vaccine policies amid a growing measles outbreak
-
Why the GOP is nervous about Ken Paxton's Senate run
Today's Big Question A MAGA-establishment battle with John Cornyn will be costly
-
Abortion protests: is free speech in retreat?
Talking Point The conviction of 64-year-old Livia Tossici-Bolt for breaching abortion clinic 'buffer zone' has made her the unlikely focus of a transatlantic row over free speech
-
Rep. Sylvester Turner dies, weeks after joining House
Speed Read The former Houston mayor and longtime state legislator left behind a final message for Trump: 'Don't mess with Medicaid'
-
'There is a lot riding on the deal for both sides'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
'Vance stands at a crossroads'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
'This quasi-coup attempt has baffled most experts'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day