Is Daylight Saving Time good for the climate?
Scientists are divided over the potential environmental benefits of the hotly contested time change

The clocks have gone back once again, ending Daylight Saving Time (DST), or British Summer Time, for 2024 – an annual practice long criticised by politicians, doctors and commuters.
Scientists are also divided over whether the time change could have the power to counter climate change. A study published in Environmental Research Letters last year found that DST decreases the energy needed to cool office buildings in the summer by nearly 6%. When the clocks go forward in spring, workers arrive at the office an hour earlier "in the cool of the morning", said Anthropocene Magazine. They leave earlier too, "which is typically when demand for cooling is greatest".
"Building energy use is a major contributor to carbon emissions, so figuring out how to cut energy demand for heating and cooling is important in fighting climate change," said the independent science magazine published by Future Earth.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But this study's findings don't necessarily apply worldwide – other inquiries into the environmental impact of DST have been far less conclusive.
Mixed findings
Daylight Saving Time became official when Germany adopted the practice (in part, to conserve coal during the war) in 1916, soon followed by the UK, but its potential energy-related benefits were being considered much earlier.
Benjamin Franklin is credited with the "original concept", said BBC Future. The US founding father analysed candle consumption in 1784 and suggested that people "alter their overall sleep schedules to save money on lighting costs".
Now, with climate change accelerating, scientists are seriously considering whether a yearly time change helps or hurts the environment.
Arizona is one of the few US states to have opted out of DST, and it does so specifically to save energy. The hot desert state implemented it in 1967 but abolished it the same year after "the clock change caused a surge in energy consumption". People had to run their air conditioners for longer into the evening, driving up costs. (The Navajo Nation within Arizona still adjusts clocks to DST, however.) As the globe heats up, more states and countries "may follow suit".
But several studies published in the US and Europe conclude that DST has "very little effect on energy conservation", said Euronews.
A study by university researchers in Prague used data from 2010 to 2017 to estimate that DST in Slovakia had led to energy savings of just 0.8% of annual electricity consumption.
Another study by the US Department of Transportation in 1975 had similar findings. DST cut about 1% of the country's energy usage, because "much of the energy saved by not having the lights on in the evening was offset by having them on in the morning."
When DST doesn't save
Experts have also called the date of the clocks changing into question. In Italy, the Society of Environmental Medicine calculated that €70 million (£58.6 million) could be saved in fuel bills simply by postponing the date by one month.
Natural time zones as close as possible to solar time would likely "align daily light and temperature curves better with our schedules", said Euronews.
"This could lead to energy savings on early-morning industrial and other lighting, early-morning heating during the colder months as people leave for work an hour later and less air conditioning needed in the car on the commute after work and in the evening at home."
'This is slowing down the entire Earth'
Scientists have discussed at length whether DST might impact climate change, but conversations about whether climate change might impact DST are much quieter.
But a study published in Nature last year suggested that in fact, climate change might be affecting timekeeping in general. Our universally agreed measurement of time, Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), is linked to the duration of a complete rotation of the Earth around its axis, and the average taken from 400 atomic clocks.
"Since the 1970s, UTC has added 27 leap seconds at irregular intervals to keep pace with atomic clocks as the Earth's rotation has gradually slowed," said Heatmap. Then in 2016, that rotation started to speed up.
Now, timekeepers have identified a need for negative "leap seconds" to account for that, Duncan Agnew (the geophysicist behind the study) told Heatmap. These are adjustments to timekeeping necessary to account for the increasing speed of Earth's rotation. Climate change has caused ice to melt in large enough quantities to change the rotation rate "of the entire Earth in a way that's visible".
This makes the DST debate even more complicated. "Just the fact that we can say, 'Look, this is slowing down the entire Earth' seems like another way of saying that climate change is unprecedented and important," said Agnew.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Music reviews: Bon Iver, Valerie June, and The Waterboys
Feature "Sable, Fable," "Owls, Omens, and Oracles," "Life, Death, and Dennis Hopper"
By The Week US
-
Are bonds worth investing in?
the explainer They can diversify your portfolio and tend to be a safer investment than stocks
By Becca Stanek, The Week US
-
Elon has his 'Legion.' How will Republicans encourage other Americans to have babies?
Today's Big Question The pronatalist movement finds itself in power
By Joel Mathis, The Week US
-
Scientists find hint of alien life on distant world
Speed Read NASA's James Webb Space Telescope has detected a possible signature of life on planet K2-18b
By Peter Weber, The Week US
-
Full moon calendar: dates and times for every full moon this year
In depth When to see the lunar phenomenon every month
By Devika Rao, The Week US
-
North America is 'dripping' into Earth's mantle
Under the radar Things are rocky below the surface
By Devika Rao, The Week US
-
The dubious nature of de-extinction
The Explainer Is it a vanity project backed by billions, or the future of animal conservation?
By Theara Coleman, The Week US
-
Scientists genetically revive extinct 'dire wolves'
Speed Read A 'de-extinction' company has revived the species made popular by HBO's 'Game of Thrones'
By Peter Weber, The Week US
-
Toxic algae could be causing sea lions to attack
In the Spotlight A particular algae is known to make animals more aggressive
By Justin Klawans, The Week US
-
Space ads could be coming to a sky near you
Under the radar Making space for commercial profits
By Devika Rao, The Week US
-
Scientists want to fight malaria by poisoning mosquitoes with human blood
Under the radar Drugging the bugs
By Devika Rao, The Week US