Is Daylight Saving Time good for the climate?
Scientists are divided over the potential environmental benefits of the hotly contested time change
The clocks have gone back once again, ending Daylight Saving Time (DST), or British Summer Time, for 2024 – an annual practice long criticised by politicians, doctors and commuters.
Scientists are also divided over whether the time change could have the power to counter climate change. A study published in Environmental Research Letters last year found that DST decreases the energy needed to cool office buildings in the summer by nearly 6%. When the clocks go forward in spring, workers arrive at the office an hour earlier "in the cool of the morning", said Anthropocene Magazine. They leave earlier too, "which is typically when demand for cooling is greatest".
"Building energy use is a major contributor to carbon emissions, so figuring out how to cut energy demand for heating and cooling is important in fighting climate change," said the independent science magazine published by Future Earth.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But this study's findings don't necessarily apply worldwide – other inquiries into the environmental impact of DST have been far less conclusive.
Mixed findings
Daylight Saving Time became official when Germany adopted the practice (in part, to conserve coal during the war) in 1916, soon followed by the UK, but its potential energy-related benefits were being considered much earlier.
Benjamin Franklin is credited with the "original concept", said BBC Future. The US founding father analysed candle consumption in 1784 and suggested that people "alter their overall sleep schedules to save money on lighting costs".
Now, with climate change accelerating, scientists are seriously considering whether a yearly time change helps or hurts the environment.
Arizona is one of the few US states to have opted out of DST, and it does so specifically to save energy. The hot desert state implemented it in 1967 but abolished it the same year after "the clock change caused a surge in energy consumption". People had to run their air conditioners for longer into the evening, driving up costs. (The Navajo Nation within Arizona still adjusts clocks to DST, however.) As the globe heats up, more states and countries "may follow suit".
But several studies published in the US and Europe conclude that DST has "very little effect on energy conservation", said Euronews.
A study by university researchers in Prague used data from 2010 to 2017 to estimate that DST in Slovakia had led to energy savings of just 0.8% of annual electricity consumption.
Another study by the US Department of Transportation in 1975 had similar findings. DST cut about 1% of the country's energy usage, because "much of the energy saved by not having the lights on in the evening was offset by having them on in the morning."
When DST doesn't save
Experts have also called the date of the clocks changing into question. In Italy, the Society of Environmental Medicine calculated that €70 million (£58.6 million) could be saved in fuel bills simply by postponing the date by one month.
Natural time zones as close as possible to solar time would likely "align daily light and temperature curves better with our schedules", said Euronews.
"This could lead to energy savings on early-morning industrial and other lighting, early-morning heating during the colder months as people leave for work an hour later and less air conditioning needed in the car on the commute after work and in the evening at home."
'This is slowing down the entire Earth'
Scientists have discussed at length whether DST might impact climate change, but conversations about whether climate change might impact DST are much quieter.
But a study published in Nature last year suggested that in fact, climate change might be affecting timekeeping in general. Our universally agreed measurement of time, Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), is linked to the duration of a complete rotation of the Earth around its axis, and the average taken from 400 atomic clocks.
"Since the 1970s, UTC has added 27 leap seconds at irregular intervals to keep pace with atomic clocks as the Earth's rotation has gradually slowed," said Heatmap. Then in 2016, that rotation started to speed up.
Now, timekeepers have identified a need for negative "leap seconds" to account for that, Duncan Agnew (the geophysicist behind the study) told Heatmap. These are adjustments to timekeeping necessary to account for the increasing speed of Earth's rotation. Climate change has caused ice to melt in large enough quantities to change the rotation rate "of the entire Earth in a way that's visible".
This makes the DST debate even more complicated. "Just the fact that we can say, 'Look, this is slowing down the entire Earth' seems like another way of saying that climate change is unprecedented and important," said Agnew.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How secure are royal palaces?
The Explainer Royal family's safety is back in the spotlight after the latest security breach at Windsor
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magnificent Tudor castles and stately homes to visit this year
The Week Recommends The return of 'Wolf Hall' has sparked an uptick in visits to Britain's Tudor palaces
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
I'm a Celebrity 2024: 'utterly bereft of new ideas'?
Talking Point Coleen Rooney is the star attraction but latest iteration of reality show is a case of 'rinse and repeat'
By Irenie Forshaw, The Week UK Published
-
Mars may have been habitable more recently than thought
Under the Radar A lot can happen in 200 million years
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Diamonds could be a brilliant climate solution
Under the radar A girl and the climate's best friend
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
New DNA tests of Pompeii dead upend popular stories
Speed Read An analysis of skeletal remains reveals that some Mount Vesuvius victims have been wrongly identified
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How AI-generated images are threatening science
Under The Radar Publishers and specialists are struggling to keep up with the impact of new content
By Abby Wilson Published
-
A giant meteor did double duty on Earth billions of years ago
Under the Radar Nutrients from the impact led to a "fertilizer bomb"
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Orkney's war on stoats
In the Spotlight A coordinated stoat cull on the Scottish islands has proved successful – and conservationists aren't slowing down
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Some of Earth's oldest crust is disintegrating. No cause for alarm, folks.
Under the radar Even stable land is slowly changing
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
A Viking Age skeleton discovery could shed light on ancient DNA
In the Spotlight The 50 skeletons were 'exceptionally well-preserved'
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published