Why Twitter is backtracking on its inactive account purge
Social media giant had planned to begin the cull in the coming weeks
Twitter has temporarily stopped its purge of inactive accounts following an outcry from its users.
The company began warning users on Monday that it would be deleting accounts belonging to people who had not logged in for at least six months unless they signed in and agreed to its new privacy policy, the BBC reports.
However, users and critics pointed out that the purge could result in the removal of accounts belonging to people who had died, the broadcaster adds.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
In a series of tweets, the social network revealed that it would be suspending the deletions until it established a way to memorialise the accounts of dead users.
“We’ve heard you on the impact that this would have on the accounts of the deceased. This was a miss on our part,” a Twitter spokesperson said. “We will not be removing any inactive accounts until we create a new way for people to memorialise accounts.”
Why was Twitter purging accounts in the first place?
On the surface, it seems odd that a social media platform would remove the accounts of inactive users at relatively short notice. While it’s common for services to block user access until they’ve agreed to a new privacy policy, account deletion is somewhat unorthodox.
However, Twitter says that it had been forced into the move to comply with the European Union’s GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) laws that came into effect in May 2018, hence the degree of urgency.
While it initially planned to remove the inactive accounts of people within the EU, it intended to expand the purge across the whole platform at a later date.
It’s also believed that the cull was to “crack down on bad actors and bots circulating misinformation”, according to PC Magazine.
But the move drew criticism from people whose dead relatives had an account, as they serve as “a valuable way of keeping their memory alive”, The Independent reports. If the cull had gone ahead as planned, these accounts may have vanished from December.
What do social media services do with deceased user accounts?
Twitter currently doesn’t offer a service that allows relatives of deceased users to manage their account, The Guardian notes, though the company is in the process of devising a system in the wake of this week’s user backlash.
Facebook, however, allows users to “memorialise” the account of a dead relative, which converts the person’s profile into a memorial page, says CNet. This option means the account won’t appear in Facebook ads, the “people you may know” section or send out reminders about their birthday.
Another option is for someone to allocate a relative as a “legacy contact” before their passing, the tech site adds. While a legacy contact cannot access a person’s messages or posts, they can respond to friend requests and update the profile picture and cover photo.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How to earn extra cash for Christmas
The Explainer The holiday season can be expensive but there are ways to bolster your festive finances
By Marc Shoffman, The Week UK Published
-
Christmas gifts for children: the top toys of the year
The Week Recommends The most sought-after kids' presents revealed
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
Should Line of Duty return?
Talking Point Adrian Dunbar's hint about a series reboot has some critics worried
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
Bluesky: the social media platform causing a mass X-odus
The Explainer Social media platform is enjoying a new influx but can it usurp big rivals?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Australia proposes social media ban before age 16
Speed Read Australia proposes social media ban before age 16
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Social media ban: will Australia's new age-based rules actually work?
Talking Point PM Anthony Albanese's world-first proposal would bar children under 16 even if they have parental consent, but experts warn that plan would be ineffective and potentially exacerbate dangers
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
States sue TikTok over children's mental health
Speed Read The lawsuit was filed by 13 states and Washington, D.C.
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The 'loyalty testers' who can check a partner's fidelity
Under The Radar The history of 'honey-trapping goes back a long way'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Elon Musk's X blinks in standoff with Brazil
Speed Read Brazil may allow X to resume operations in the country, as Musk's company agrees to comply with court demand
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Pakistan 'gaslighting' citizens over sudden internet slowdown
Under the Radar Government accused of 'throttling the internet' and spooking businesses with China-style firewall, but minister blames widespread use of VPNs
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Threads turns one: where does the Twitter rival stand?
In the Spotlight Although Threads is reporting 175 million active monthly users, it has failed to eclipse X as a meaningful cultural force
By Keumars Afifi-Sabet, The Week UK Published