Ralph Hall's loss: What does ousting a 91-year-old vet say about us?

Coming just one day after Memorial Day, the timing of Rep. Ralph Hall's defeat in Tuesday night's Texas Republican primary runoff makes it irresistible to avoid asking some larger questions about changing American attitudes. Now, starting next year, there will be no World War II veterans serving in Congress.

As The Washington Post reported,

There was a time when voters would have probably returned Hall to office, if only out of loyalty or respect for his past service. (Indeed, how many times do you suspect he was re-elected based on this?) To be sure, there were a lot of problems with this old way of thinking, which likely led to entrenched power, cronyism, and out-of-touch representatives.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

But why are things changing now? Is an 89-year old congressman fine, but a 91-year old one isn't? Or has something else shifted? This feels like the kind of move made by a mobile, ruggedly individualistic people — not of a communitarian, populist society. What, if anything, might this say about our declining reverence for our elders — and/or the rapidly diminishing connection and reverence we have for The Greatest Generation?