Should sitting presidents be subject to subpoenas? Kavanaugh still won't say.

Political cartoon.
(Image credit: Screenshot/Twitter/NBC News)

Even without protesters and senators rocking the floor, Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's ongoing confirmation hearing was sure to be complicated. On Wednesday, the second day of Kavanaugh's confirmation hearing, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) asked the nominee whether "a sitting president [would] be required to respond to a subpoena." Kavanaugh's views on the issue have been hotly debated as legal troubles swirl around President Trump.

Kavanaugh, pleading the "Justice Ginsburg principle," said he couldn't answer Feinstein's "hypothetical question." But he did discuss the U.S. v Nixon ruling, saying the Supreme Court — including former President Richard Nixon's own nominee to the bench — unanimously mandated that Nixon release his secret recordings specifically "in response to a criminal trial subpoena." It's "an important precedent of the Supreme Court," Kavanaugh said, but as a "sitting judge and a nominee," he couldn't say how it would apply in the future.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up
Explore More
Kathryn Krawczyk

Kathryn is a graduate of Syracuse University, with degrees in magazine journalism and information technology, along with hours to earn another degree after working at SU's independent paper The Daily Orange. She's currently recovering from a horse addiction while living in New York City, and likes to share her extremely dry sense of humor on Twitter.