Trump's plan to nominate John Ratcliffe as director of national intelligence didn't even last a full week

President Trump on Friday backed away from his plan to nominate Rep. John Ratcliffe (R-Texas) as the next director of national intelligence after just five days.

Trump announced his intention to nominate Ratcliffe, who he praised as a "highly respected congressman," to replace Dan Coats on June 28. But Ratcliffe drew scrutiny in the following days when reports from The New York Times and other outlets emerged that he allegedly exaggerated aspects of his career as a prosecutor. Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.), the Senate Intelligence Committee's top Democrat, said that this "raises enormous red flags," CNN reports.

On Friday, Trump wrote that he "explained to John how miserable it would be" for him to "go through months of slander and libel," saying that Ratcliffe has as a result "decided to stay in Congress."

The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Join more than 350,000 subscribers and keep yourself informed with a selection of The Week’s most interesting, enlightening and entertaining stories - plus daily puzzles.

Sign up

Ratcliffe himself said on Twitter that he is "very grateful" to have been picked by Trump but that "I do not wish for a national security and intelligence debate surrounding my confirmation, however untrue, to become a purely political and partisan issue." Therefore, he says he has asked Trump to "nominate someone other than me for this position."

This whole cycle occurred so quickly that Trump didn't actually ever get the chance to formally nominate Ratcliffe for the position before this announcement, but he promised on Friday a new pick will come "shortly."