How social media is limiting political content
Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
Meta is reducing what the social media giant defines as "political content" across Instagram and Threads after automatically enrolling users in a new setting.
Unless users opt in, the topic of politics is now automatically limited from suggested posts in Explore, Reels, Feed Recommendations, and Suggested Users. Although the change won't affect the content from accounts that someone follows, the "extraordinary move" has "far-reaching and significant consequences for the public discourse", said CNN.
What has Meta done?
"If you decide to follow accounts that post political content, we don't want to get between you and their posts," Meta said in a blog post, "but we also don't want to proactively recommend political content from accounts you don't follow." So the company "won't proactively recommend content about politics on recommendation surfaces across Instagram and Threads".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
To "clarify", said Teen Vogue, the policy "specifically impacts content from accounts you don't follow, meaning those you might stumble upon in 'recommended' posts or on your Explore page, or are recommended as an IG Reel".
Why has the policy been introduced?
As far back as 2021, Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said during a financial results conference call that "one of the top pieces of feedback we're hearing from our community" was that "people don't want politics and fighting to take over their experience on our services".
In 2023, The Wall Street Journal reported that Meta wanted to "scale back how much political content it showed users", amid claims following the 6 January Capitol insurrection that its platforms spread disinformation and hate speech.
In a conversation on Threads with The Verge's Alex Heath last year, Instagram boss Adam Mosseri said that although "politics and hard news are important", any "incremental engagement or revenue they might drive is not at all worth the scrutiny, negativity let's be honest, or integrity risks that come along with them".
Political content on social media has been under increasing scrutiny. Last year, X was labelled the "worst major platform for disinformation in Europe" by regulators after it disabled a tool for reporting fake political news, said The Times.
What is defined as 'political content'?
Meta's definition of the term is "vague", said Time. "No one knows what they define as 'political'," said CNN. According to a Meta spokesperson, "our definition of political content is content likely to be about topics related to government or elections; for example, posts about laws, elections, or social topics".
"These global issues are complex and dynamic, which means this definition will evolve," the spokesperson added.
What has the reaction been?
The new setting has "quickly raised alarm among many who questioned the scope and rationale in the run-up to a high-stakes election", said CNN. TechCrunch questioned whether the new system could even work. Politics was still "dominating" Threads after Joe Biden's State of the Union address earlier this month, the site said. If users have "a real-time platform" where they can "dash off quick reactions as short, text posts, they're likely going to use that platform to talk about whatever the news of the day happens to be".
Some users believe that Meta is "actively muzzling civic action", said Time, "with widespread allegations of a particular crackdown on pro-Palestinian voices" amid the "ongoing war in Gaza".
But "on balance", said Social Media Today, "removing politics entirely makes sense". Since implementing content recommendations, Facebook and Instagram usage has "increased". Up to 40%" of the content that users are shown in the app now comes through that route, which suggests that people are "responding well to entertainment-based content", while "politics brings more headaches".
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Chas Newkey-Burden has been part of The Week Digital team for more than a decade and a journalist for 25 years, starting out on the irreverent football weekly 90 Minutes, before moving to lifestyle magazines Loaded and Attitude. He was a columnist for The Big Issue and landed a world exclusive with David Beckham that became the weekly magazine’s bestselling issue. He now writes regularly for The Guardian, The Telegraph, The Independent, Metro, FourFourTwo and the i new site. He is also the author of a number of non-fiction books.
-
'Horror stories of women having to carry nonviable fetuses'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Harold Maass, The Week US Published
-
Haiti interim council, prime minister sworn in
Speed Read Prime Minister Ariel Henry resigns amid surging gang violence
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Today's political cartoons - April 26, 2024
Cartoons Friday's cartoons - teleprompter troubles, presidential immunity, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Is the AI bubble deflating?
Today's Big Question Growing skepticism and high costs prompt reconsideration
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Instagram hopes that blurring nudity in messages will make teens safer
The Explainer The option will be turned on by default for users under 18
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
The complex environmental toll of artificial intelligence
The explainer AI is very much mostly not green technology
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
Data breaches increased in 2023 and with them, internet security concerns
The Explainer One report found a 78% year-to-year increase in breaches from 2022 to 2023
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
AI is recreating the voices of mass shooting victims
The Explainer The parents of these victims are using the AI to try and lobby Congress for gun control
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
How AI can — and cannot — be used to help air traffic controllers
The Explainer Some in the industry say AI will never replace humans, but can still be a useful assistant
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Cyberflashing, fake news and the new crimes in the Online Safety Act
The Explainer UK's first conviction demonstrates scope of controversial law that critics describe as a threat to privacy and free speech
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Nightshade: the 'data poisoning' tool boosting fightback against AI
Under the Radar Like 'putting hot sauce in your lunch so it doesn't get stolen from the workplace fridge', says creator
By The Week UK Published