What's fueling Trump's debate dilemma?
With the first debate of the 2024 GOP primary looming, the current frontrunner seems entirely uninterested
Donald Trump is hardly what most critics would call a masterful debater — at least, not in the classical sense. He eschews specific answers for blunt oration, favoring bombast and aggression over discourse and detail. As a candidate in the 2016 presidential election, Trump's ability to turn each debate into a spectacle of insults and sound bytes — a "mega debate" per the Washington Post — helped him winnow his way through a shrinking roster of rivals with each successive event. It would be inaccurate to say that Trump won his party's nomination on the strength of his debate performances alone, but it's hard to imagine a world in which he had taken the stage at the Republican National Convention without them.
Nearly eight years later the GOP again stands at the cusp of a debate cycle seemingly tailor-made for Trump's particular campaign style. Once again the Republican field is overcrowded with a mix of career politicians, rising conservative stars, and "outsider" dark horses, none of whom have landed on an effective antidote to Trump's diluvial approach to politics. Unlike 2016, however, Trump himself is no longer an unknown quantity, confounding expectations as he burns a path from the bottom up through his ostensibly more qualified rivals. This time around, Trump sits comfortably atop a GOP field fundamentally defined by a party that has reshaped itself in his own image. And now with the first scheduled Republican primary debate just days away, the party's leading candidate has signaled that he won't join the competition on stage in Milwaukee at the end of the month.
What's behind Donald Trump's "will I/won't I" debate posturing? And given the state of the Republican presidential race at large, will it even matter in the long run?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What are the commentators saying?
After initially asserting that he would not sign a Republican National Committee pledge to support the eventual GOP nominee — one of the prerequisites to participate in the debate — Trump left himself an opening to reverse his decision, telling Newsmax's Eric Bolling that he hadn't "totally ruled it out."
"Attention. That's it," former RNC communications director Doug Heye explained to The Hill. Trump's refusal to commit one way or another is designed to "maximize attention so the conversation isn't about the debate — the conversation's about whether or not Donald Trump will debate."
Arguing that Trump skipping the debate would be "good for him and the GOP," Politico's Jack Shafer pointed out that not only is Trump's lead so "stupendous" that "the cosmos would have to split open and smite him to block his nomination," but that a Trump-less debate would be an opportunity for the party to "shape the post-Donald landscape." The primary forces hoping Trump does choose to attend are, per Shafer, the "relevance-seeking RNC" and "ratings-hungry Fox News executives."
In no small part, there's little to be gained politically by Trump should he choose to attend the upcoming debate. "If you have a 20-stroke lead going into the 18th hole, you tend not to be that worried," he mused during a recent appearance at his Bedminster golf course, seemingly acknowledging the benefit of sitting on his enormous polling lead without having to defend it onstage. He was even more direct in a Fox News interview earlier this summer, asking "Why would you let somebody that's at zero or one or two or three percent be popping you with questions?" Should he attend, there's a "real downside risk" for Trump in affording his rivals the opportunity to upend "the idleness that's defined the race so far," which would in turn "[allow] the race to become a race," according to Slate.
Conversely, "If he's not there, nobody is going to defend him from what will turn into a prime-time event bashing him," GOP strategist Alex Conant told The Hill. "Presidential campaigns live and die by media oxygen, and if you're not on the debate stage, you're giving a ton of oxygen to your challengers." That oxygen, however, could also be used to further separate Trump from the pack by refocusing the attention on the former president's chief rival at the moment; "Trump's absence could also take a toll on DeSantis, who would become the top candidate on the debate stage — and thus the target of the event," CNBC's Kevin Breuninger said, noting that "Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas experienced something of that kind during the 2016 debate that Trump skipped."
What's next?
It's wholly possible that Trump will keep the public — and his rivals — guessing up until the last possible moment, choosing only after exploiting the uncertainty to maximal effect. To that end, some of his fellow Republican candidates are reportedly not waiting to see what he decides and are instead "holding debate prep sessions as if Trump will be there," NBC News reported this week. Even if Trump ends up skipping, those Trump-focused debate prep sessions will still come in handy for candidates who have to "prepare for the shadow that he casts over because he's not in the room," one GOP operative told the network.
"Have no doubt that whether he debates or not, there will be cameras on him that night," Slate predicted, highlighting the event held simultaneously with the 2016 debate chose to skip. "He has options. None of them involve peace and quiet."
Trump himself has hinted at his own counter-programming should he opt out of this debate, telling Reuters this summer that "We've had a lot of offers, whether it's a rally or whether it's an interview by somebody else."
"Not to be braggadocious," he added, "but the debate will not be a very exciting one if I'm not there."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.
-
'It may not be surprising that creative work is used without permission'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
5 simple items to help make your airplane seat more comfortable
The Week Recommends Gel cushions and inflatable travel pillows make a world of difference
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
How safe are cruise ships in storms?
The Explainer The vessels are always prepared
By Devika Rao, The Week US Published
-
'It may not be surprising that creative work is used without permission'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What message is Trump sending with his Cabinet picks?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION By nominating high-profile loyalists like Matt Gaetz and RFK Jr., is Trump serious about creating a functioning Cabinet, or does he have a different plan in mind?
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
Gaetz ethics report in limbo as sex allegations emerge
Speed Read A lawyer representing two women alleges that Matt Gaetz paid them for sex, and one witnessed him having sex with minor
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The clown car cabinet
Opinion Even 'Little Marco' towers above his fellow nominees
By Mark Gimein Published
-
What Mike Huckabee means for US-Israel relations
In the Spotlight Some observers are worried that the conservative evangelical minister could be a destabilizing influence on an already volatile region
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
The Pentagon faces an uncertain future with Trump
Talking Point The president-elect has nominated conservative commentator Pete Hegseth to lead the Defense Department
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'All Tyson-Paul promised was spectacle and, in the end, that's all we got'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
Can Europe pick up the slack in Ukraine?
Today's Big Question Trump's election raises questions about what's next in the war
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published