Israel's hardline national security minister has sparked outrage across the Muslim world by flouting a decades-old arrangement aimed at keeping religious tensions over Jerusalem's Temple Mount in check. On Sunday, Itamar Ben-Gvir prayed at the Al Aqsa Mosque compound (pictured above) that sits atop the Temple Mount, or Haram al-Sharif, as it is known to Muslims. A spokesperson for Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas said Ben-Gvir's action had "crossed all red lines."
What's the history? "The history of the Temple Mount is one of perpetual friction," said Simon Kupfer at The Times of Israel. It was the site of King Solomon's temple and remains the holiest site in Judaism. In the seventh century, the Islamic Caliph Abd al Malik conquered Jerusalem and built the Dome of the Rock and the Al Aqsa Mosque there. The site then became the third-holiest site in Islam, after Mecca and Medina.
Jerusalem changed hands repeatedly over the next 1000 years. Then, in 1967, after Israel "stormed east Jerusalem," the Israeli government handed "day-to-day control of the temple" to a Jordanian-controlled Islamic trust called the Waqf, and "thus began the status quo that remains in place today."
What are the rules about prayer? Under a "delicate, decades-old arrangement" with Muslim authorities, "Jews can visit but may not pray there," said Sky News. "Suggestions that Israel could alter the rules at the compound have sparked outrage in the Muslim world before, and ignited violence in the past." Arab nations, including Saudi Arabia and Jordan, have condemned Ben-Gvir's prayer visit, with Jordan describing it as a "blatant violation of international law and international humanitarian law, an unacceptable provocation."
What will it all mean? The timing of Ben-Gvir's action "must be understood in a broader political context," said Amos Harel at Haaretz. With Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu facing growing public pressure to end the war in Gaza, his national security minister clearly sought to pour "gas on the fire."
"There is, unfortunately, no clear solution" to the religious tensions around the site, said Kupfer at The Times of Israel. The history of the Mount is "soaked in blood." It's not a question of whether it "will spark another flame that ignites another conflict, but rather, when." |