The pros and cons of raising the debt ceiling
Is there a better solution than revising the limit every few years?
A crisis is mounting as the GOP-led House of Representatives and President Biden remain at an impasse over the debt ceiling. This occurs every few years when the government finds itself needing to borrow more money to pay its financial commitments. Congress eventually reaches a deal to increase the amount of debt that can be incurred by the feds.
This is necessary because the nation borrows so much money, and "Congress has authorized trillions of dollars in spending over the last decade, causing the United States' debt to nearly triple since 2009," the Council on Foreign Relations notes. But is a cap on borrowing the best way to deal with the nation's debts?
Proponents of raising the ceiling view it as a necessary legislative tool to avoid a national default, while critics say that the ceiling "measures no coherent economic indicator." So is this continuous loop of debt ceiling increases necessary?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Pro: It's the only way to avoid defaulting
The obvious reason to keep raising the debt ceiling is that it avoids defaulting on the nation's debts. This means that the U.S. would fundamentally be unable to pay back its existing loans, described by Bloomberg as a "major disaster" that could significantly impact the world economy.
Raising the debt ceiling helps avoid a never-ending freefall toward defaulting. If this occurs, it means the U.S. "would not have enough money to pay its bills, including interest and other payments it owes to bondholders, military salaries, and benefits to retirees," Alan Rappeport writes for The New York Times. "No one knows exactly what would happen if the United States gets to this point but the government could wind up defaulting on its debt if it is unable to make required payments to its bondholders," Rappeport adds, arguing a debt ceiling is the best way to avoid this.
Con: There is no better alternative
While the debt ceiling causes problems, there is no other solution, its proponents argue. One alternative that has been floated is the idea of minting a $1 trillion coin to pay off the nation's debts. However, "there are so many murky questions about whether or not it's legal and [if] would it be challenged, and that's just a mess," Louise Sheiner, an economist at the Brookings Institution, tells NPR.
Even if a coin like that was feasible, "you wouldn't prevent the chaos in the debt market that we're all worried about from the debt ceiling breach," Sheiner adds. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen even told CNBC that the coin was "a gimmick" that shouldn't be considered.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Pro: A debt ceiling holds up the dollar
Increasing the debt ceiling continuously helps to prop up the global value of the American dollar, and bursting it would mean "the US would lose its status as the world's 'safe' asset — a place where investors can be confident their debt will be repaid," Akin Oyedele writes for Insider.
Even coming close to the debt ceiling would "take a lot of confidence out of the market," John Velis, vice president of global macro strategy at State Street, tells Insider. Such a default "would certainly be felt on the dollar. The dollar has been weakening for a variety of reasons, but this certainly wouldn't make it more attractive if it looked like the U.S. couldn't do its basic functions as the provider of the reserve currency around the world."
Con: Raising the debt ceiling is irresponsible
Many House Republicans have a simple explanation for eliminating the debt ceiling — its continued increase is simply bad money management. Congress "can't just keep doing the same thing under the same conditions with the same management and expect different outcomes," Rep. Scott Perry (R-Pa.) tells ABC News, claiming that "the American people are sick and tired of this endless debt increasing."
The GOP-led House Budget Committee feels similarly, and writes that Congress must "'reverse the curse' of deepening deficits and debt by addressing the underlying reason that we are having to raise the debt ceiling to begin with: uncontrolled federal spending." The committee adds that the problem with the debt ceiling is that it allows for "wasteful, inefficient, and unnecessary federal spending."
Pro: Debt ceilings keep the government in check
Getting rid of the debt ceiling would eliminate a major check on the government, and "the bottom line is that the federal budget is a horrible mess, and Congress is to blame for it," Veronique de Rugy writes for National Review.
The debt ceiling is necessary to keep the budget normalized, de Rugy says, adding, "Congress has behaved irresponsibly for years." She adds that people criticizing the debt ceiling should be "upset about the symptom of the disease, not the disease itself."
Con: The debt ceiling is too politicized
"Policymaking in the United States has been reduced to grappling with whatever crisis looms largest," The New York Times wrote in a 2021 op-ed. While it was necessary a century ago, the ceiling "has not served a useful purpose in living memory. It endures only as a dangerous impediment to the necessary function of the federal government," the Times added.
Democrats often say they don't want to eliminate the debt ceiling because "Republicans would portray them as fiscally irresponsible," the Times said. However, by making this decision, "they are being fiscally irresponsible" themselves.
Justin Klawans has worked as a staff writer at The Week since 2022. He began his career covering local news before joining Newsweek as a breaking news reporter, where he wrote about politics, national and global affairs, business, crime, sports, film, television and other news. Justin has also freelanced for outlets including Collider and United Press International.
-
5 inflammatory cartoons on the L.A. wildfires
Cartoons Artists take on climate change denial, the blame game, and more
By The Week US Published
-
The problems with the current social care system
The Explainer The question of how to pay for adult social care is perhaps the greatest unresolved policy issue of our time
By The Week UK Published
-
Austria's new government: poised to join Putin's gang
Talking Point Opening for far-right Freedom Party would be a step towards 'the Putinisation of central Europe'
By The Week UK Published
-
Why Trump's Cabinet nominees are facing confirmation delays
In the Spotlight Paperwork and politics play a role
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Can Republicans navigate their narrow House majority?
In the Spotlight This isn't the first time that a party has had no margin for error
By David Faris Published
-
How does Inauguration Day work?
The Explainer Part Constitution, part tradition
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
'We should be shouting the pluralism achievements of college athletics from the mountaintops'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
US considering ban on Chinese drones as international tensions grow
In the Spotlight The decision will ultimately be made by the incoming Trump administration
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
'This growing lack of social exposure is terrible for us and terrible for democracy'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By Justin Klawans, The Week US Published
-
What would a constitutional convention look like?
In the Spotlight There's no precedent, raising fears of a 'runaway convention'
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Harmeet Dhillon: the combative lawyer who will oversee the DOJ's civil rights division
In the Spotlight Harmeet Dhillon is best known for taking on high-profile right-wing culture war cases
By David Faris Published