Flag-burning in the US: What is the law?
Donald Trump calls for prison term or citizenship to be revoked if people descrate the Stars and Stripes
Donald Trump has said Americans who burn the US flag should face "consequences", suggesting a year in prison or having their citizenship revoked as suitable punishments.
The president-elect's decision to highlight the issue yesterday is perplexing, says the Washington Post. "Flag-burning is not an issue that has occupied a central position in the American political consciousness of late," it says, although the flag has been set on fire in recent weeks during protests against the presidential election result.
What is the law?
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Laws prohibiting the burning or desecration of the Stars and Stripes have been struck down by the Supreme Court, most recently in 1990, because they were found to have violated the First Amendment protecting freedom of speech.
A constitutional amendment that would allow the government to ban flag-burning has been proposed many times but has never passed, says Politico.
What is Trump proposing?
While the president-elect hasn't elaborated on his call, it is possible he will look to resurrect a 2005 bill that would have banned flag-burning - co-sponsored by his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
However, in an interview with CNN, Trump's senior communications adviser Jason Miller "struggled to defend the president-elect's position", says Politico.
What has the reaction been?
Trump has found himself in a minority on the issue, with even prominent Republicans arguing that flag-burning is constitutionally protected.
House majority leader Kevin McCarthy said he "did not agree with the practice" but it was important to protect First Amendment rights.
Senior Republican Sean Duffy added he thought it was "probably right that we want to protect those people who want to protest and their right to actually demonstrate with disgracing our flag".
Other warned Trump had introduced the idea of stripping citizenship rights for political speech.
-
Who were the ‘weekend snipers’ of Sarajevo?Under the Radar Italian authorities launch investigation into allegations far-right gun enthusiasts paid to travel to Bosnian capital and shoot civilians ‘for fun’ during the four-year siege
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Glinda vs. Elphaba, Jennifer Lawrence vs. postpartum depression and wilderness vs. progress in November moviesthe week recommends This month’s new releases include ‘Wicked: For Good,’ ‘Die My Love’ and ‘Train Dreams’
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
‘America today isn’t just looking to overcome’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Trump tariffs face stiff scrutiny at Supreme CourtSpeed Read Even some of the Court’s conservative justices appeared skeptical