Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women
Afghanistan's minister for vice and virtue announced a "bizarre new restriction" this week which appears to ban women from speaking to each other, said The Daily Telegraph. "Even when an adult female prays and another female passes by, she must not pray loudly enough for them to hear," Khalid Hanafi said in an audio clip released on Monday.
He also reiterated an earlier decree forbidding women from singing, saying: "How could they be allowed to sing if they aren't even permitted to hear [each other's] voices while praying?"
The ban on women praying together joins a list of restrictions on women's speech passed in August, when Afghanistan's ruling regime banned women from speaking in public or loudly inside their homes, to prevent their voices from being heard by men.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
Human rights activists have warned it could mean "women are effectively banned from holding conversations with one another", said The Telegraph, although Hanafi's "rambling" voice recording left exact details unclear.
"They [the Taliban] are waging an all-out war against us, and we have no one in the world to hear our voices," a former civil servant told the paper from Kabul. Now, "we cannot even hear each other's voices".
The European Court of Justice ruled this month that simply being an Afghan woman is considered "sufficient" grounds to grant asylum. In August, the regime announced Afghanistan's first vice and virtue laws, approved by the Taliban's supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada. These forbid women from looking at men, speaking to men who aren't relatives, or showing their faces or bodies at all. The rules effectively eliminate women's voices from public spaces.
Women's voices are "deemed to be potential instruments of vice", said The Guardian. In this light, it's "concerning" that international organisations have been "trying to normalise relations with the Taliban", said former Afghan parliamentarian Shukria Barakzai. They are "whitewashing" the Taliban, disregarding its "widespread human rights violations".
Why would a regime that has already barred women from working, learning or travelling alone "deprive women of their voice"? asked vocal coach and author Aline Jalliet in Le Monde. "In a country where women must avoid the gaze of men, their voice was their last mark of individual identity", she wrote. Requiring women to remain silent "makes them transparent, blending into the background". In that sense, it's "easy to forget they're there".
"The voice is like the sign of life," said Afghan journalist Hamina Adam on France Culture radio channel. "It's just another way of killing us even more."
Before the August laws, small groups of Afghan women still marched in cities "demanding their rights", said the BBC's Afghanistan correspondent Yogita Limaye. Now, "even the small joys that were making life bearable are fraught with fear". Even if Taliban edicts such as the latest aren't strictly imposed or enforced, "people start self-regulating".
"We don't dare to take down our masks. We even avoid speaking among ourselves, thinking that if someone from the Taliban hears us they could stop and question us," one girl told the broadcaster. "If we can't speak, why even live? We're like dead bodies moving around."
A psychologist also warned the BBC that Afghanistan's "pandemic" of female suicide could worsen. "They feel all hope is gone and there is no point in continuing living," she said. "And it's becoming more and more difficult to counsel them."
What next?
The UN has called for the Taliban to repeal the "egregious" laws, which were an attempt to turn women into "faceless, voiceless shadows". Its mission in Afghanistan said it was considering the laws' potential impact on humanitarian assistance. In response, the Taliban said it would no longer cooperate with the UN; relations appear to have "hit a significant roadblock", said the BBC's Limaye.
Afghan women are "showing their dissent by posting videos of themselves online, their faces covered, singing songs about freedom". There are also signs of "divisions" among the Taliban regarding the ban on women's education – but the Kandahar-based leadership "has remained intransigent". The supreme leader has also vowed to start stoning women to death in public again.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harriet Marsden is a writer for The Week, mostly covering UK and global news and politics. Before joining the site, she was a freelance journalist for seven years, specialising in social affairs, gender equality and culture. She worked for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent, and regularly contributed articles to The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The New Statesman, Tortoise Media and Metro, as well as appearing on BBC Radio London, Times Radio and “Woman’s Hour”. She has a master’s in international journalism from City University, London, and was awarded the "journalist-at-large" fellowship by the Local Trust charity in 2021.
-
Judges block $25B Kroger-Albertsons merger
Speed Read The proposed merger between the supermarket giants was stalled when judges overseeing two separate cases blocked the deal
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Netanyahu takes the stand in corruption trial
Speed Read He is Israel's first sitting leader to take the stand as a criminal defendant
By Rafi Schwartz, The Week US Published
-
New Syria government takes charge, urging 'stability'
Speed Read The rebel forces that ousted Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad announced an interim government
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How should the West respond to Syria's new leadership?
Today's Big Question The weight of historical interventions and non-interventions in the region hangs heavy on Western leaders' minds
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Could Russia's faltering economy end the war?
Today's Big Question Sanctions are taking a toll. So could an end to combat.
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
Romania's election rerun
The Explainer Shock result of presidential election has been annulled following allegations of Russian interference
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Russia's shadow war in Europe
Talking Point Steering clear of open conflict, Moscow is slowly ratcheting up the pressure on Nato rivals to see what it can get away with.
By The Week UK Published
-
What's next in Syria's civil war?
Today's Big Question Rebels seize Aleppo, putting Assad on defense
By Joel Mathis, The Week US Published
-
President Yoon's three hours of chaos: what was South Korea leader thinking?
Today's Big Question A surprise declaration of martial law ignited protests and turmoil overnight
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Cutting cables: the war being waged under the sea
In the Spotlight Two undersea cables were cut in the Baltic sea, sparking concern for the global network
By The Week UK Published
-
The nuclear threat: is Vladimir Putin bluffing?
Talking Point Kremlin's newest ballistic missile has some worried for Nato nations
By The Week UK Published