Has the Taliban banned women from speaking?
'Rambling' message about 'bizarre' restriction joins series of recent decrees that amount to silencing of Afghanistan's women

Afghanistan's minister for vice and virtue announced a "bizarre new restriction" this week which appears to ban women from speaking to each other, said The Daily Telegraph. "Even when an adult female prays and another female passes by, she must not pray loudly enough for them to hear," Khalid Hanafi said in an audio clip released on Monday.
He also reiterated an earlier decree forbidding women from singing, saying: "How could they be allowed to sing if they aren't even permitted to hear [each other's] voices while praying?"
The ban on women praying together joins a list of restrictions on women's speech passed in August, when Afghanistan's ruling regime banned women from speaking in public or loudly inside their homes, to prevent their voices from being heard by men.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
What did the commentators say?
Human rights activists have warned it could mean "women are effectively banned from holding conversations with one another", said The Telegraph, although Hanafi's "rambling" voice recording left exact details unclear.
"They [the Taliban] are waging an all-out war against us, and we have no one in the world to hear our voices," a former civil servant told the paper from Kabul. Now, "we cannot even hear each other's voices".
The European Court of Justice ruled this month that simply being an Afghan woman is considered "sufficient" grounds to grant asylum. In August, the regime announced Afghanistan's first vice and virtue laws, approved by the Taliban's supreme leader, Hibatullah Akhundzada. These forbid women from looking at men, speaking to men who aren't relatives, or showing their faces or bodies at all. The rules effectively eliminate women's voices from public spaces.
Women's voices are "deemed to be potential instruments of vice", said The Guardian. In this light, it's "concerning" that international organisations have been "trying to normalise relations with the Taliban", said former Afghan parliamentarian Shukria Barakzai. They are "whitewashing" the Taliban, disregarding its "widespread human rights violations".
Why would a regime that has already barred women from working, learning or travelling alone "deprive women of their voice"? asked vocal coach and author Aline Jalliet in Le Monde. "In a country where women must avoid the gaze of men, their voice was their last mark of individual identity", she wrote. Requiring women to remain silent "makes them transparent, blending into the background". In that sense, it's "easy to forget they're there".
"The voice is like the sign of life," said Afghan journalist Hamina Adam on France Culture radio channel. "It's just another way of killing us even more."
Before the August laws, small groups of Afghan women still marched in cities "demanding their rights", said the BBC's Afghanistan correspondent Yogita Limaye. Now, "even the small joys that were making life bearable are fraught with fear". Even if Taliban edicts such as the latest aren't strictly imposed or enforced, "people start self-regulating".
"We don't dare to take down our masks. We even avoid speaking among ourselves, thinking that if someone from the Taliban hears us they could stop and question us," one girl told the broadcaster. "If we can't speak, why even live? We're like dead bodies moving around."
A psychologist also warned the BBC that Afghanistan's "pandemic" of female suicide could worsen. "They feel all hope is gone and there is no point in continuing living," she said. "And it's becoming more and more difficult to counsel them."
What next?
The UN has called for the Taliban to repeal the "egregious" laws, which were an attempt to turn women into "faceless, voiceless shadows". Its mission in Afghanistan said it was considering the laws' potential impact on humanitarian assistance. In response, the Taliban said it would no longer cooperate with the UN; relations appear to have "hit a significant roadblock", said the BBC's Limaye.
Afghan women are "showing their dissent by posting videos of themselves online, their faces covered, singing songs about freedom". There are also signs of "divisions" among the Taliban regarding the ban on women's education – but the Kandahar-based leadership "has remained intransigent". The supreme leader has also vowed to start stoning women to death in public again.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Harriet Marsden is a writer for The Week, mostly covering UK and global news and politics. Before joining the site, she was a freelance journalist for seven years, specialising in social affairs, gender equality and culture. She worked for The Guardian, The Times and The Independent, and regularly contributed articles to The Sunday Times, The Telegraph, The New Statesman, Tortoise Media and Metro, as well as appearing on BBC Radio London, Times Radio and “Woman’s Hour”. She has a master’s in international journalism from City University, London, and was awarded the "journalist-at-large" fellowship by the Local Trust charity in 2021.
-
June 25 editorial cartoons
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons include war on a loop, the New York City mayoral race, and one almighty F-bomb
-
How generative AI is changing the way we write and speak
In The Spotlight ChatGPT and other large language model tools are quietly influencing which words we use
-
How long can Nato keep Donald Trump happy?
Today's Big Question Military alliance pulls out all the stops to woo US president on his peacemaker victory lap
-
How developed was Iran's nuclear program and what's left now?
Today's Big Question Israel and the United States have said different things about Iran's capabilities
-
After Israel's brazen Iran attack, what's next for the region and the world?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Following decades of saber-rattling, Israel's aerial assault on Iranian military targets has pushed the Middle East to the brink of all-out war
-
Why are military experts so interested in Ukraine's drone attack?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION The Zelenskyy government's massive surprise assault on Russian airfields was a decisive tactical victory — could it also be the start of a new era in autonomous warfare?
-
Ukraine-US minerals deal: is Trump turning away from Putin?
Today's Big Question US shows 'exasperation' with Russia and signs agreement with Ukraine in what could be a significant shift in the search for peace
-
What happens if tensions between India and Pakistan boil over?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION As the two nuclear-armed neighbors rattle their sabers in the wake of a terrorist attack on the contested Kashmir region, experts worry that the worst might be yet to come
-
Japan is opening up to immigration – but is it welcoming immigrants?
Under the Radar Plummeting birth rates and ageing population leaves closed-off country 'no choice' but to admit foreign workers, but tensions are growing with newly arrived Muslims
-
Why Russia removed the Taliban's terrorist designation
The Explainer Russia had designated the Taliban as a terrorist group over 20 years ago
-
Inside the Israel-Turkey geopolitical dance across Syria
THE EXPLAINER As Syria struggles in the wake of the Assad regime's collapse, its neighbors are carefully coordinating to avoid potential military confrontations