President Obama announced Monday that he is nominating Solicitor General Elena Kagan to succeed retiring liberal Justice John Paul Stevens on the Supreme Court. At 50, Kagan would be the court's youngest justice; if confirmed, she could extend Obama's legacy for decades. But both the right and the left are wondering how she'll affect the court's balance — although her impressive resume includes a stint as dean of Harvard Law School, Kagan has never served as a judge before. If confirmed, how would she influence the court? (Watch an AP report about Elena Kagan, Obama's pick)
She's a left-wing wildcard: With "no experience as a judge," Kagan represents a mediocre choice, says Ed Morrissey in Hot Air. But Obama's clearly trying to avoid "a big fight" on this one. With no "track record of judicial activism" to derail her confirmation, she's the perfect "stealth" liberal.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Actually, Kagan will shift the court to the right: Conservatives have no reason to complain, says Rick Ungar in True/Slant. During her years at Harvard Law School, Kagan wrote a paper advocating expanded presidential powers — a position that would make "Bush/Cheney legal loyalists" proud. "Is this really the legacy President Obama wants to leave behind?"
"It looks like Elena Kagan for SCOTUS — could shift court to the right"
She's a consensus builder — and that will help liberals: The Supreme Court already tilts right, says Lawrence Lessig in The Huffington Post, and, although it wouldn't change much to appoint a diehard liberal whom conservatives could simply tune out, Kagan isn't ignoreable. She's a progressive thinker whose legal career "has been all about moving people of different beliefs to the position she believes is correct." That's how you pull the court back from the right.
-
Washington grapples with ICE’s growing footprint — and futureTALKING POINTS The deadly provocations of federal officers in Minnesota have put ICE back in the national spotlight
-
‘One day fentanyl will come back — and there will be little anyone can do’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
15 years after Fukushima, is Japan right to restart its reactors?Today’s Big Question Balancing safety fears against energy needs
-
The billionaires’ wealth tax: a catastrophe for California?Talking Point Peter Thiel and Larry Page preparing to change state residency
-
Bari Weiss’ ‘60 Minutes’ scandal is about more than one reportIN THE SPOTLIGHT By blocking an approved segment on a controversial prison holding US deportees in El Salvador, the editor-in-chief of CBS News has become the main story
-
Has Zohran Mamdani shown the Democrats how to win again?Today’s Big Question New York City mayoral election touted as victory for left-wing populists but moderate centrist wins elsewhere present more complex path for Democratic Party
-
Millions turn out for anti-Trump ‘No Kings’ ralliesSpeed Read An estimated 7 million people participated, 2 million more than at the first ‘No Kings’ protest in June
-
Ghislaine Maxwell: angling for a Trump pardonTalking Point Convicted sex trafficker's testimony could shed new light on president's links to Jeffrey Epstein
-
The last words and final moments of 40 presidentsThe Explainer Some are eloquent quotes worthy of the holders of the highest office in the nation, and others... aren't
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
