Michelle Obama and the great American tradition of political rhetoric
There remains a deep longing at the heart of the human soul for beautiful language. And the first lady delivered.
The word "rhetoric" gets a bad rap. To call something "rhetoric" is usually to dismiss it. Yet for most of the span of our civilization, "rhetoric" was something taught in schools, and thought essential to participation in society. It was long part of the "Trivium," or the classical liberal arts that you had to study to be considered part of civilized society. In eras that had a reverence for text and the written word, the art of not only persuading, but more generally expressing oneself well, was considered of paramount importance.
In America today, our political rhetoric, such as it is, does not exactly live up to the standards set by our forebears.
Read a speech by Abraham Lincoln or Theodore Roosevelt or John F. Kennedy. Then compare it to Donald Trump, who has turned broken English into a political weapon. (Hillary Clinton's speeches aren't exactly Shakespeare either.)
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
And yet, there remains a deep longing at the heart of the human soul for beautiful language.
Occasionally, you still catch glimpses of it — like in Michelle Obama's rightly acclaimed speech at the Democratic National Convention.
I'm a conservative. I oppose Obama's progressive movement. But you have to give credit where due. It was a great speech, well delivered. More importantly, it was a prime example of the American tradition of political rhetoric.
It was full of implicit critiques of Trump, who was never explicitly named. "When you have the nuclear codes at your fingertips and the military in your command, you can't make snap decisions. You can't have thin skin or a tendency to lash out. You need to be steady and measured and well-informed," the first lady told us. Who could she possibly have in mind?
She also expertly wove the personal and the political, and the political into the grand narrative of American history. The first lady opened her speech by talking about her family, and especially her two beautiful daughters.
Having her family in the White House is significant for another important reason, too. "I wake up every morning in a house that was built by slaves," she said. "And I watch my daughters — two beautiful intelligent black young women — play with the dog on the White House lawn."
This is what the speech is about. Michelle Obama's personal story is also the story of America — a story of progress and of emancipation. Within the American progressive movement, there have always been two schools of thought regarding America: those that decry the country for all its crimes, and those who embrace America because it embodies, through its ideals enshrined in documents, and the sweep of its history, those progressive values.
In their rhetoric, the Obamas have almost always been firmly in the latter camp, which has a distinguished history in American political rhetoric. America is a great nation precisely because it is the nation of progressive change.
And now, of course, let's welcome the next stage of America's progress: "Because of Hillary Clinton, my daughters and all of our sons and daughters now take for granted that a woman can be president of the United States."
The speech has its flaws, of course. Sometimes it veers a bit too much in repeating clunky-sounding platitudes ("the love and hope and impossibly big dreams that we all have for our children"). But overall, it's just beautifully done. The Obamas' personal story, which is of course touching at a human level for anyone with a soul, is woven into a political argument about the election, which itself is woven into the grand American narrative. Nice work. More like this please, from politicians of all stripes.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Pascal-Emmanuel Gobry is a writer and fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. His writing has appeared at Forbes, The Atlantic, First Things, Commentary Magazine, The Daily Beast, The Federalist, Quartz, and other places. He lives in Paris with his beloved wife and daughter.
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published