How leftists can leave the Democratic Party without destroying it
I know you're having visions of Florida circa 2000. But there's another way.
If Donald Trump and the extreme right is to be defeated, labor unions must be reinvigorated. But that raises another question: How? People have been trying to do that for decades now, and it has not arrested the long, slow decline of union membership. The remaining unions have mostly fallen into a sort of operational conservatism that frequently slides into strategic malpractice.
I previously argued that the Democratic Party must recognize that the labor union is one of the few tried-and-tested institution that might bring the party back from its utter devastation at the state and local levels, and one that fits well with the political weaknesses that lost the election for Hillary Clinton.
But realistically speaking, that's probably a stretch. Pro-labor thinking is unfamiliar to most Democrats (with a few exceptions like Sherrod Brown and Bernie Sanders), and as former labor organizer Rich Yeselson points out, politicians almost always respond to powerful actors rather than attempting to create those actors themselves.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
But suppose we created a new, explicitly worker's party?
Now, I know what you're thinking. That means vote splitting like in Florida in 2000, and we can't risk it. The Green Party and Libertarian Party have been running presidential campaigns for years, and what do they have to show for it? Therefore, leftists should work within the Democratic Party to make their voices heard (and if centrist liberals are being honest, they would generally prefer it if leftists avoided primary challenges or indeed any criticism of whatever nominee the party structure happens to vomit up).
That's where this absolutely brilliant article from Seth Ackerman comes in. He proposes a new party — but one which is cleverly designed to avoid the vote-splitting effects and tremendous effort over ballot access that consumes the Libertarian and Green parties (and to a lesser extent the Working Families Party).
Let me explain. An odd thing about the Democratic Party is that, unlike other similarly-oriented parties like Labour in the U.K., it has no members. You don't join up, pay dues, and then get to vote on the binding party platform and leadership. This is part and parcel of a whole suite of U.S. electoral laws — many of them not seen outside of dictatorships, Ackerman demonstrates — that maintain strict elite control over the party machinery, and make it nearly impossible for third parties to even get on the ballot.
Ackerman shows that a new party could easily have such a democratic structure, and then deal with ballot access on a case-by-case basis. So instead of spending gobs of money getting on the ballot everywhere, and gobs more defending from a suite of harassing lawsuits, this new party would probe to find the easiest point of entry depending on circumstances.
One easy place to start would be bulking out a slate of candidates for every one of the literally hundreds of legislative seats the Democrats do not even bother to contest, many of which would be totally winnable under decent circumstances, and campaigns for which would cost a relative pittance at the state level. (Few have noticed that the Citizens United case made it much easier to set up and fundraise for a new quasi-party like this.) In that case, they could run on the Democratic line, while only being nominally attached to the corrupt and incompetent leadership that got us into this mess — and remaining accountable to the membership due to the new party's democratic structure. Elsewhere, they might attempt primary challenges against weak Democrats, or even contest general elections here and there.
Big unions, of course, are deeply embedded in the Democratic Party. They probably wouldn't be all that excited to jump on board with a new party. However, by design it won't interfere with the actual Democrats very much — and as said before, will be relatively cheap compared to the tens of millions unions spend on presidential campaigns. If a new party manages to rack up some victories, I can easily see some big unions tentatively supporting such an effort.
A Tea Party-style hard core of disciplined, organized left-wingers is what the Democrats and the country have been crying out for. Ackerman's proposal is the most realistic and convincing plan for one that I've seen yet.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
Today's political cartoons - March 27, 2024
Cartoons Wednesday's cartoons - Diddy raided, Biden investigated, and more
By The Week US Published
-
6 presumed dead in Baltimore bridge collapse
Speed Read A massive cargo ship hit a support pillar of the Francis Scott Key Bridge, causing it to crumple
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
Best music albums: new releases of 2024
The Week Recommends A round-up of the best pop, dance, indie, classical and rock releases
By The Week UK Published
-
The debate about Biden's age and mental fitness
In Depth Some critics argue Biden is too old to run again. Does the argument have merit?
By Grayson Quay Published
-
How would a second Trump presidency affect Britain?
Today's Big Question Re-election of Republican frontrunner could threaten UK security, warns former head of secret service
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'Rwanda plan is less a deterrent and more a bluff'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
By The Week UK Published
-
Henry Kissinger dies aged 100: a complicated legacy?
Talking Point Top US diplomat and Nobel Peace Prize winner remembered as both foreign policy genius and war criminal
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Trump’s rhetoric: a shift to 'straight-up Nazi talk'
Why everyone's talking about Would-be president's sinister language is backed by an incendiary policy agenda, say commentators
By The Week UK Published
-
More covfefe: is the world ready for a second Donald Trump presidency?
Today's Big Question Republican's re-election would be a 'nightmare' scenario for Europe, Ukraine and the West
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Xi-Biden meeting: what's in it for both leaders?
Today's Big Question Two superpowers seek to stabilise relations amid global turmoil but core issues of security, trade and Taiwan remain
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Will North Korea take advantage of Israel-Hamas conflict?
Today's Big Question Pyongyang's ties with Russia are 'growing and dangerous' amid reports it sent weapons to Gaza
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published