The astounding procedural abuses of the Republican Congress
Republicans have lost all right to participate in government the next time they're in the minority


The method by which the Republican Party is attempting to pass their TrumpCare bill is at least as notable as its monstrous contents. Many changes have been made to the bill since its last version went down in flames (due to rulings from the Senate parliamentarian that certain stipulations were out of order), and so Republicans went into a scheduled vote Tuesday without having any idea what was being voted on. There is no final text of a bill, no hearings of any kind, and, of course, no Congressional Budget Office score.
And yet on Tuesday, Senate Republicans approved by the narrowest of margins the motion to proceed to a debate on this mystery bill. Tens of millions of Americans' health insurance (and hundreds of thousands of lives) now hang in the balance.
But one thing is certain. Someday soon Democrats will get another bite at the health-care apple. Pressure to pass Medicare for all, or something approximating it, will be intense. When that debate happens, Republicans will have forfeited the right to any input, attention, or political respect of any kind.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Now, it will not be necessary to replicate the level of duplicity and concealment that Republicans have done with TrumpCare, for the simple reason that Medicare for all (or something similar) would be broadly popular and successful. They are hiding the ball because TrumpCare is about as popular as smallpox, and the Republican leadership knows it. ObamaCare, by contrast, was unpopular for years, but a significant proportion of people who disliked it — including some Trump voters — did so because it didn't go far enough.
Everyone who isn't either stinking rich or brain-poisoned by right-wing propaganda wants cheaper, better insurance, not a return to the lousy previous status quo. (In particular, many people just above the income cutoff for the ObamaCare Medicaid expansion were understandably jealous of those poor enough to qualify.) So when the vicious cuts in TrumpCare became widely known, ObamaCare's popularity jumped up by comparison — better that than the alternative.
So Democrats have no reason to fear passing a bill through regular order, with the usual hearings, markups, and CBO scores. And they should restore traditional constitutional democracy, where both experts and the citizenry get a chance to weigh in — most importantly, allowing time for CBO analysis so people can know what is being voted on. By definition, of course, the opposition party would then get time to participate in floor debate.
But Republicans have completely obliterated any reason for Democrats — or anyone else — to take seriously any words that come out of their lying mouths. ObamaCare was passed after over a year of debate, with a slew of committee hearings, markups, and careful — indeed, rather neurotic — attention to CBO scores. Centrist Democrats, partly fueled by President Obama's desperate desire for bipartisanship, courted Republican senators with a fervent intensity. (For their trouble they were strung out for months and got nothing.)
Despite all that, Republicans yowled like trodden-on cats that Democrats were abusing the Constitution, congressional precedent, and freedom itself to ram the bill through. To pick one of hundreds of examples, eight months before the final bill was passed, Paul Ryan earnestly whined that the process was "not good democracy."
Now not only have Republicans gone far above their ridiculous caricature of Democratic behavior, they're trampling down norms of deliberative democracy in a totally unprecedented fashion.
Whether all this was conscious deception or Republicans being so poisoned by right-wing agitprop that they can no longer recognize reality doesn't really matter. The upshot is that the Republican Party is absolutely, fundamentally untrustworthy. They deserve nothing but contempt in any future policy debate of any kind.
It would be only right and proper for the Medicare for All Act of 2021 to be queued up prior to the new Congress taking power, fully costed out and ready for scoring. It would be given about two months for full congressional procedure, with the entire Democratic caucus attending every Republican speech with their backs turned from start to finish. After every scruple was attended to (though Senate Democrats would probably have to vote to abolish the filibuster), it would be passed on a party-line vote. Perhaps they could celebrate by obsequiously hand-delivering the new Medicare enrollment cards to every Republican member of Congress.
That's probably wishful thinking, given today's Democratic Party. But if they had an ounce of self-respect, that's what they would do.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Ryan Cooper is a national correspondent at TheWeek.com. His work has appeared in the Washington Monthly, The New Republic, and the Washington Post.
-
5 hilariously sparse cartoons about further DOGE cuts
Cartoons Artists take on free audits, report cards, and more
By The Week US Published
-
Following the Tea Horse Road in China
The Week Recommends This network of roads and trails served as vital trading routes
By The Week UK Published
-
Crossword: March 30, 2025
The Week's daily crossword
By The Week Staff Published
-
The JFK files: the truth at last?
In The Spotlight More than 64,000 previously classified documents relating the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy have been released by the Trump administration
By The Week Staff Published
-
'Seriously, not literally': how should the world take Donald Trump?
Today's big question White House rhetoric and reality look likely to become increasingly blurred
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Trump's 'madman' strategy pay off?
Today's Big Question Incoming US president likes to seem unpredictable but, this time round, world leaders could be wise to his playbook
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Democrats vs. Republicans: who are the billionaires backing?
The Explainer Younger tech titans join 'boys' club throwing money and support' behind President Trump, while older plutocrats quietly rebuke new administration
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
US election: where things stand with one week to go
The Explainer Harris' lead in the polls has been narrowing in Trump's favour, but her campaign remains 'cautiously optimistic'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Trump okay?
Today's Big Question Former president's mental fitness and alleged cognitive decline firmly back in the spotlight after 'bizarre' town hall event
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
The life and times of Kamala Harris
The Explainer The vice-president is narrowly leading the race to become the next US president. How did she get to where she is now?
By The Week UK Published
-
Will 'weirdly civil' VP debate move dial in US election?
Today's Big Question 'Diametrically opposed' candidates showed 'a lot of commonality' on some issues, but offered competing visions for America's future and democracy
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published