Mueller inquiry targeted by criminal probe
Barr comes under fire as Trump administration investigates the investigators

The Trump administration’s probe into the origins of the 2016 Mueller inquiry is now a criminal investigation, US sources say.
It had previously been classed as an administrative review, but the switch to a criminal probe means investigators now have more powers, says the BBC. They will be able to issue subpoenas for testimony and documents relating to Robert Mueller’s inquiry into Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia.
The investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election did not clear the president of obstructing justice, but could not prove any criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The president has repeatedly branded Mueller’s investigation a “witch hunt”.
His administration’s decision to investigate the Mueller inquiry is likely to raise concerns that Trump and his supporters could be using new tactics to go after the president’s political opponents, says Al Jazeera.
“Trump has made clear that he sees the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies,” says The New York Times.
In a joint statement, the chairs of the House judiciary and intelligence committees said the news of a switch to a criminal investigation raised “profound new concerns that the Department of Justice under [attorney general William] Barr has lost its independence and become a vehicle for President Trump’s political revenge”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It’s not clear when the inquiry shifted to a criminal investigation, and the source who revealed the switch was not authorised to discuss the matter publicly.
The Justice Department has not commented on the reports, or what potential crime is under investigation.
John Durham, the US attorney for Connecticut, was appointed to lead the review that began in May. Before the switch to a criminal investigation, his powers were limited to voluntarily questioning people and examining government files.
Trump said at the time that he did not order Barr to start the administrative review, but said it was “a great thing that he did” and he was “so proud of our attorney general”.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
-
Africa's largest dam is making diplomatic waves
Under the Radar Ethiopians view using the Nile as a 'sovereign right' but the vast hydroelectric project has 'fuelled nationalist fervour' in Egypt and Sudan
-
Jessica Francis Kane's 6 favorite books that prove less is more
Feature The author recommends works by Penelope Fitzgerald, Marie-Helene Bertino, and more
-
Trump's drug war is now a real shooting war
Talking Points The Venezuela boat strike was 'not a mere law enforcement action'
-
House posts lewd Epstein note attributed to Trump
Speed Read The estate of Jeffrey Epstein turned over the infamous 2003 birthday note from President Donald Trump
-
Trump threatens critics with federal charges
Feature Days after FBI agents raided John Bolton's home, Trump threatened legal action against Chris Christie
-
Why are Trump's health rumors about more than just presidential fitness?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Extended absences and unexplained bruises have raised concerns about both his well-being and his administration's transparency
-
'The McDonald's menu board is one fascinating thing'
Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
DC sues Trump to end Guard 'occupation'
Speed Read D.C. Attorney General Brian Schwalb argues that the unsolicited military presence violates the law
-
Epstein accusers urge full file release, hint at own list
speed read A rally was organized by Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie, who are hoping to force a vote on their Epstein Files Transparency Act
-
Court hands Harvard a win in Trump funding battle
Speed Read The Trump administration was ordered to restore Harvard's $2 billion in research grants
-
Why reports of Donald Trump's demise are greatly exaggerated
In The Spotlight US president has once again brushed aside rumours that he's dead