Mueller inquiry targeted by criminal probe
Barr comes under fire as Trump administration investigates the investigators
The Trump administration’s probe into the origins of the 2016 Mueller inquiry is now a criminal investigation, US sources say.
It had previously been classed as an administrative review, but the switch to a criminal probe means investigators now have more powers, says the BBC. They will be able to issue subpoenas for testimony and documents relating to Robert Mueller’s inquiry into Donald Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia.
The investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 US presidential election did not clear the president of obstructing justice, but could not prove any criminal conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The president has repeatedly branded Mueller’s investigation a “witch hunt”.
His administration’s decision to investigate the Mueller inquiry is likely to raise concerns that Trump and his supporters could be using new tactics to go after the president’s political opponents, says Al Jazeera.
“Trump has made clear that he sees the typically independent Justice Department as a tool to be wielded against his political enemies,” says The New York Times.
In a joint statement, the chairs of the House judiciary and intelligence committees said the news of a switch to a criminal investigation raised “profound new concerns that the Department of Justice under [attorney general William] Barr has lost its independence and become a vehicle for President Trump’s political revenge”.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
It’s not clear when the inquiry shifted to a criminal investigation, and the source who revealed the switch was not authorised to discuss the matter publicly.
The Justice Department has not commented on the reports, or what potential crime is under investigation.
John Durham, the US attorney for Connecticut, was appointed to lead the review that began in May. Before the switch to a criminal investigation, his powers were limited to voluntarily questioning people and examining government files.
Trump said at the time that he did not order Barr to start the administrative review, but said it was “a great thing that he did” and he was “so proud of our attorney general”.
–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––For a round-up of the most important stories from around the world - and a concise, refreshing and balanced take on the week’s news agenda - try The Week magazine. Get your first six issues free–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––
-
Who were the ‘weekend snipers’ of Sarajevo?Under the Radar Italian authorities launch investigation into allegations far-right gun enthusiasts paid to travel to Bosnian capital and shoot civilians ‘for fun’ during the four-year siege
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
Glinda vs. Elphaba, Jennifer Lawrence vs. postpartum depression and wilderness vs. progress in November moviesthe week recommends This month’s new releases include ‘Wicked: For Good,’ ‘Die My Love’ and ‘Train Dreams’
-
A free speech debate is raging over sign language at the White HouseTalking Points The administration has been accused of excluding deaf Americans from press briefings
-
‘America today isn’t just looking to overcome’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Is Trump a lame duck president?Talking Points Republicans are considering a post-Trump future
-
Trump pardons 2020 fake electors, other GOP alliesSpeed Read The president pardoned Rudy Giuliani and more who tried to overturn his 2020 election loss
-
Trump’s trade war: has China won?Talking Point US president wanted to punish Beijing, but the Asian superpower now holds the whip hand
-
‘This is where adaptation enters’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Trump ordered to fully fund SNAPSpeed Read The Justice Department is appealing the decision
-
Trump tariffs face stiff scrutiny at Supreme CourtSpeed Read Even some of the Court’s conservative justices appeared skeptical