What powers will Donald Trump have as US president?
Congress has significant checks on presidential power, but will Republican-dominated houses use them?
Donald Trump is to be the next president of the United States, after upending poll predictions to beat Democratic rival Hillary Clinton on election night.
While the president-elect receives his first briefings on his future role, the US and the global community are digesting the ramifications of the surprise result – particularly the powers he will now exercise as the "leader of the free world".
Is the US president the world's most powerful man?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
On the face of it, yes. As president, Trump will be commander-in-chief of the world's most powerful military, and leader of a nation with a GDP of $18trn (£14.5trn).
On top of that, the former hotel magnate now has 2.7 million more people on the payroll, in the form of the nation's army of federal employees, and the ability to appoint 4,000 senior officials.
However, his greatest power comes in a non-descript briefcase. The black satchel, nicknamed the "nuclear football", contains the launch codes to activate the US's nuclear missiles and is carried by a top-level aide wherever the president goes.
Trump has said he would be prepared to use nuclear weapons as "an absolute last step", causing Clinton to question whether "a man you can bait with a tweet" should have ultimate authority over potentially world-ending weaponry.
However, while only the president can order the use of nuclear weapons, the order must be approved by the secretary of defence before it can be carried out.
How is the president's power limited?
US government is structured so power is shared across three branches: executive (the president), legislative (Congress - the House of Representatives and the Senate) and judicial (Supreme Court).
If a president does not agree with a bill approved by Congress, he or she has the power to veto it.
The presidential veto can be overridden by a two-thirds majority in the Senate; however this power is executed only rarely in practice.
Presidents have vetoed 1,506 bills and Congress has overridden only 111 of them, according to official records, the last time in September, when representatives overturned President Barack Obama's veto of a bill that would allow 9/11 victims' families to sue Saudi Arabia.
Congress's real power over the White House, however, lies in its control of the purse strings. In the mid-1990s, the federal government was forced to shut down for 28 days when the Republican-controlled Congress refused to approve Bill Clinton's budget.
However, Trump's position "will be vastly strengthened because his fellow Republicans retained control of the two houses of the US Congress," Al Jazeera reports.
In extreme cases of presidential misbehaviour, defined by the Constitution as "treason, bribery, or other high crimes and misdemeanours", the House of Representatives can vote to subject him or her to trial by the Senate, known as impeachment.
But although three have faced such proceedings - Clinton, Richard Nixon and Andrew Johnson - none has been sacked: Nixon resigned before the House could vote, while Johnson and Clinton survived their trials, if only by a single vote in the case of Johnson.
How do presidents get anything done?
Occasionally by simply ignoring the rules, as when Abraham Lincoln suspended the right of habeas corpus during the American Civil War. However, the most common route in modern times is through Executive Orders, presidential decrees with the force of law.
Pioneered by Theodore Roosevelt, they have been used to desegregate the US army (under Harry S Truman), ban the use of federal funds for abortion (under Ronald Reagan) and start an air war in Kosovo (under Clinton).
Congress can negate an Executive Order by passing legislation conflicting with it, although this could be subject to a presidential veto.
If an Executive Order is thought to conflict with the Constitution, it can be taken to the Supreme Court.
Although any Supreme Court judges nominated by Trump and passed by a Republican-dominated Congress are likely to be conservative, this does not necessarily mean special favours. Each individual be known for having "liberal" or "conservative" leanings, but their primary duty is to interpret and protect the rights guaranteed by the Constitution.
Could Trump declare war?
Under the US constitution, only Congress can declare war, although Republican Senator John McCain argued these powers are limited in practice as the nature of modern warfare rarely involves formal declarations between sovereign states.
Theoretically, military operations longer than 60 days require a congressional authorisation of force. However, several senators have expressed concerns about their imprecise and indefinite nature.
Democrat Tim Kaine said the congressional authorisation passed three days after 9/11 to target al-Qaeda and the Taliban "is being interpreted as a blank check to allow war without geographic limitation, without temporal limitation".
Since 2008, Kaine and McCain have been pushing a bipartisan bill that would compel the president to consult Congress before authorising any significant military action and for a congressional vote on the operation within 30 days.
Even with checks on using military force, Trump's power over foreign affairs will be "enormous and terrifying", says Jean Galbraith, an assistant professor at Penn Law.
A president can act without Congressional approval in "setting foreign policy priorities", "ordering some uses of force abroad" and – chilling news to those who welcomed the Paris climate change accords - "withdrawing the United States from most types of international agreements".
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The real story behind the Stanford Prison Experiment
The Explainer 'Everything you think you know is wrong' about Philip Zimbardo's infamous prison simulation
By Tess Foley-Cox Published
-
Is it safe for refugees to return to Syria?
Talking Point European countries rapidly froze asylum claims after Assad's fall but Syrian refugees may have reason not to rush home
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Quiz of The Week: 14 - 20 December
Have you been paying attention to The Week's news?
By The Week Staff Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
How could J.D. Vance impact the special relationship?
Today's Big Question Trump's hawkish pick for VP said UK is the first 'truly Islamist country' with a nuclear weapon
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published