Doctors urged to stop offering 40 'unnecessary' procedures
Many common interventions are of little or no benefit to patients, report says
Forty NHS procedures that offer scant benefit, or no benefit at all, to patients have been identified in an unprecedented list of treatments that should no longer be routinely offered.
The Academy of Medical Royal Colleges (AMRC), which oversees 24 medical bodies including the Royal College of Surgeons and the Royal College of General Practitioners, made the unprecedented intervention to advise doctors against ordering procedures simply "by force of habit".
Among the commonly used interventions that are not ordinarily necessary, the AMRC report cites X-rays for lower back pain, plaster casts for small fractures and check-ups for routine surgeries such as cataracts.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
"Most controversially", the Daily Telegraph reports, the AMRC suggests chemotherapy for advanced cancer should be carefully considered, as "benefit is likely to be small, and the harm may be great".
Fear of legal repercussions and patient expectations were cited by doctors as the leading reasons for ordering unnecessary procedures.
The AMRC consulted experts from 11 different medical fields and asked them to identify commonly used treatments or procedures that were not always necessary or beneficial. The guidance is part of the body's Choosing Wisely campaign that aims to provoke frank dialogue between doctors and patients about treatment paths.
Despite increasingly urgent warnings in recent months about the financial sustainability of the NHS, Professor Dame Sue Bailey, the chair of AMRC, said that the guidance was not intended primarily as a money-saving measure, but to encourage frank dialogue between doctors and patients.
"Patients should ask 'what would happen if I do nothing?'" she said. "Medicine or surgical interventions don't need to be the only solution offered by a doctor and more certainly doesn't always mean better."
Among the 40 procedures that AMRC wants to see phased out of common use are:
- X-rays for lower back pain without other cause for concern
- Electronic monitoring of a baby's heart in normal pregnancies
- Prostate Specific Antigen blood test to detect signs of prostate cancer
- Blood tests to diagnose the menopause
- Plaster casts for children with small wrist fractures
- Saline solution rather than plain tap water for cleaning small cuts and grazes
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Tutankhamun: the mystery of the boy pharaoh's pierced ears
Under the Radar Researchers believe piercings suggest the iconic funerary mask may have been intended for a woman
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Exploring Easter Island, one of the world's most remote inhabited islands
The Week Recommends It takes time and effort to travel to this mystical locale
By Catherine Garcia, The Week US Published
-
Linda McMahon, the former wrestling mogul tapped for Department of Education
In the Spotlight Longtime Trump ally set for nomination as secretary of the agency despite limited background in the field
By David Faris Published
-
Should blood donors be paid?
The Explainer Financial rewards would help fill NHS shortfall but bring risk of contamination and exploitation, WHO warns
By The Week UK Published
-
UK gynaecological care crisis: why thousands of women are left in pain
The Explainer Waiting times have tripled over the past decade thanks to lack of prioritisation or funding for women's health
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
A 'transformative' gene therapy for haemophilia B
The Explainer Costly treatment that could be 'truly life-changing' for patients with rare blood disorder gets funding boost
By Julia O'Driscoll, The Week UK Published
-
Infected blood scandal: will justice be served?
Today's Big Question Government apologises for 'decades-long moral failure' and promises £10bn compensation but true accountability may take far longer
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Immunotherapy and hay fever
The Explainer Research shows that the treatment could provide significant relief from symptoms for many hay fever sufferers
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The pros and cons of universal health care
Pros and Cons A medical system that serves everyone comes with its own costs, and they're not only financial
By Rebecca Messina, The Week UK Last updated
-
Martha's Rule: patients given right to urgent second opinion
The Explainer Hospitals in England will launch new scheme that will allow access to a rapid treatment review
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
The contaminated blood scandal
The Explainer Widely regarded as the worst treatment disaster in the history of the NHS, the public inquiry is due to publish its report in May
By The Week UK Published