Africans denied visas for African trade summit in US
Not one delegate from the continent was allowed to enter California, says chairwoman
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
An African trade summit in California went ahead with no African attendees after the delegates were denied visas, Voice of America reports.
Mary Flowers, chairwoman of the annual African Global Economic & Development Summit, said they usually find 40 per cent of African guests faced visa problems. This year, however, every African citizen who requested a visa was rejected, she says.
"Every delegation, and it was sad to see because these people were so disheartened," she told Voice of America.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
She added that the experience was nothing new, but was "a discrimination issue with the African nations" that "we experience over and over and over".
Up to 100 African delegates were due to participate in the three-day event at the University of Southern California, which aims to foster business and trade partnerships between Africa and the US.
The Guardian says some are "now questioning whether the denials to [this year's] event could be tied to the anti-immigration policies of Donald Trump".
Trump's revised travel ban prohibits entry to the US for citizens of three African countries: Libya, Somalia and Sudan.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
According to The Independent, those denied visas last week were from Sierra Leone, Guinea, Ghana, Nigeria, Ethiopia and South Africa, none of which are covered by the executive order.
The US State Department has yet to comment.