Facebook leak reveals rules for controversial content
Moderator training manual unveils fine line deciding what can be shown on the social network
Videos depicting gory violence and even deaths may be allowed to remain on Facebook under some circumstances, according to leaked training manuals for the site's moderators.
In an exclusive report, The Guardian reveals the guidelines explicitly detailing the site's response to content containing sex, nudity, violence or death - a balancing act between protecting users from graphic material and maintaining Facebook's status as an open platform which can play a vital part in spreading awareness of issues.
Among them is a proviso stating "videos of abortion only violate if they contain nudity", while another says adult nudity is permissible in content showing Nazi concentration camps.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to the manual on graphic violence, "sadism" is the key factor in deciding whether violent footage should be removed.
If images or videos show the wounding or death of a person or animal with a title or caption suggesting enjoyment or celebration, the content should be deleted, says Facebook.
However, while videos of violence or death are "disturbing", moderators are told to be aware that they may also be a means of "documenting atrocities" and can "help create awareness" of issues such animal cruelty or non-sexual child abuse.
Videos in this category are marked as "disturbing" and do not auto-play. They also contain a warning screen and are not accessible to users under the age of 18.
Content related to self-harm must always be flagged up to senior managers, the Guardian reports. A two-week period last summer saw 4,531 such cases, of which 63 prompted Facebook to contact the authorities.
The training manual also says Facebook Live streams showing self-harm or suicide attempts should not be shut down, despite the service being criticised for being used to broadcast sexual assaults, torture, murder and suicide.
Facebook says it is wary of cutting users off from friends who may be able to offer support or intervene to keep them safe in a time of trouble.
"We don't want to censor or punish people in distress who are attempting suicide," says a memo sent to site moderators.
Another document adds: "Users post self-destructive content as a cry for help, and removing it may prevent that cry for help from getting through."
However, moderators are told the content should be deleted after "there is no longer an opportunity to help the person" and minimise the risk of encouraging copycat behaviour, unless they are considered particularly newsworthy, such as footage of 9/11 which shows people leaping from the Twin Towers.
The leak "gives new insights into the uncomfortable role the social media giant now plays as a content regulator," says CNN.
Create an account with the same email registered to your subscription to unlock access.
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
Italian senate passes law allowing anti-abortion activists into clinics
Under The Radar Giorgia Meloni scores a political 'victory' but will it make much difference in practice?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Magazine interactive crossword - May 3, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - May 3, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
Magazine solutions - May 3, 2024
Puzzles and Quizzes Issue - May 3, 2024
By The Week US Published
-
How technology helps and harms endangered languages
Under the radar Languages are disappearing at fastest rate in history, accelerated by digital dominance of English
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
How social media is limiting political content
The Explainer Critics say Meta's 'extraordinary move' to have less politics in users' feeds could be 'actively muzzling civic action'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Twitter's year of Elon Musk: what happens next?
Why Everyone's Talking About 'Your platform is dying', says one commentator, but new CEO is aiming for profitability next year
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Turns out Facebook isn't as polarizing as previously thought
Talking Point New studies show that, contrary to prior belief, the algorithm has little effect on driving polarization
By Theara Coleman Published
-
Mark Zuckerberg vs. Elon Musk: a tale of the tech tape
Under the Radar The two men challenged each other to a fight after years of sniping
By Justin Klawans Published
-
How greater online regulation is prompting fears of a ‘splinternet’
feature Government pressure worldwide means the internet is not as open as it once was
By Sorcha Bradley Published
-
Donald Trump, the Pope and the disruptive power of AI images
feature AI-generated deepfakes blur reality and could be used for political disinformation or personal blackmail
By The Week Staff Published
-
The Supreme Court, Section 230 and the future of the internet
feature Lawsuits brought against tech giants could have far-reaching consequences for the internet as we know it
By Richard Windsor Published