Inside the Israel-Turkey geopolitical dance across Syria
As Syria struggles in the wake of the Assad regime's collapse, its neighbors are carefully coordinating to avoid potential military confrontations


While a new Syrian government works to establish order since Syrian rebels toppled Bashar al-Assad's government, the political power vacuum leaves some of the country's neighbors anxious to ensure their foreign policy aims. To that end, Israel and Turkey on Wednesday began a series of talks aimed at preventing confrontation between their militaries as each country conducts discrete operations within Syria.
With Syria still in fragile political flux and both Israel and Turkey navigating choppy international circumstances extending far beyond their distinct Syrian aims, what does their diplomatic tête-à-tête mean for an area reeling from years of armed conflict? And does this attempt at cooperation truly negate the risk of a military confrontation?
Why are Israel and Turkey in Syria?
Turkey has "long occupied parts of northern Syria" both to support the opposition forces who helped topple the Assad regime and to fight "Kurdish rebels that it calls a terrorist threat," said The New York Times. Israel, meanwhile, moved into a "long-established buffer zone along the Golan Heights" following Assad's ouster and has since carried out various raids and bombing strikes across southern Syria. Fearful of a "new threat along its border" with Syria now under a "new Islamist leadership," Israel has established a "buffer zone inside Syrian territory," said The Associated Press.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Israel has accused Turkey of "trying to establish a 'neo-Ottoman state,'" said Deutsche Welle, citing Israeli officials. And Israel is enacting "aggressive and expansionist policies" with its strikes on Syrian positions, Turkish officials said. The fall of the Assad government presented an "opportunity" for Turkey to "turn Syria into a sort of protectorate" for its "regional interests" beyond simply securing its shared border, said Haaretz analyst Zvi Bar'el. Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has similarly described Israeli strikes within Syria as being part of a "deliberate strategy" to prevent the new Syrian government from "inheriting any operational capability following the departure of Assad," said Turkey's pro-government Daily Sabah.
What is the goal of this week's negotiation?
This week's negotiations are "aimed at easing tensions" between the two rival powers operating in a space where "militaries of both countries are active," said Al Jazeera. The first meeting between representatives of the two nations, which took place Wednesday in Azerbaijan, marks the "beginning of efforts to set up a communications channel" intended to "avoid potential clashes or misunderstandings" as both countries deploy their militaries into Syrian territory.
During the meeting, Israeli officials made "unequivocally clear" that changes in Turkish military deployments in Syria, "particularly the establishment of Turkish bases in the Palmyra area," is a "red line" that would be taken as a serious security breach, said The Jerusalem Post. "We don't want to see Syria being used by anyone, including Turkey, as a base for attacks on Israel," Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Tuesday during an Oval Office meeting with President Donald Trump.
Netanyahu did not expand upon "what circumstance he believed Turkey might attack Israel," said the Times. And Turkey has framed the "technical" talks as being "similar to deconfliction mechanisms" it has with the U.S. and Russia, Reuters said.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Rafi Schwartz has worked as a politics writer at The Week since 2022, where he covers elections, Congress and the White House. He was previously a contributing writer with Mic focusing largely on politics, a senior writer with Splinter News, a staff writer for Fusion's news lab, and the managing editor of Heeb Magazine, a Jewish life and culture publication. Rafi's work has appeared in Rolling Stone, GOOD and The Forward, among others.
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
Music reviews: Bruce Springsteen and Benson Boone
Feature "Tracks II: The Lost Albums" and "American Heart"
-
Why passkeys are the next frontier in digital security
The Explainer A disruptive new technology promises to put passwords to bed forever — but not yet
-
Syria's returning refugees
The Explainer Thousands of Syrian refugees are going back to their homeland but conditions there remain extremely challenging
-
The armed clan allied with Israel in Gaza
Under the Radar Self-styled 'Popular Forces' has been denounced by its Bedouin tribe and Hamas for 'collaborating' with Israel
-
One year after mass protests, why are Kenyans taking to the streets again?
today's big question More than 60 protesters died during demonstrations in 2024
-
Iran nukes program set back months, early intel suggests
Speed Read A Pentagon assessment says US bombing of Iranian nuclear sites only set the program back by months, not years. This contradicts President Donald Trump's claim.
-
Trump says Iran and Israel agreed to ceasefire
Speed Read This followed a night of Israeli airstrikes on Tehran and multiple waves of missiles fired by Iran
-
How developed was Iran's nuclear program and what's left now?
Today's Big Question Israel and the United States have said different things about Iran's capabilities
-
Trump gives himself 2 weeks for Iran decision
Speed Read Trump said he believes negotiations will occur in the near future
-
What would a US strike on Iran mean for the Middle East?
TODAY'S BIG QUESTION A precise attack could break Iran's nuclear programme – or pull the US and its allies into a drawn-out war even more damaging than Iraq or Afghanistan