Tribunal fees scrapped after Supreme Court ruling
Groundbreaking case could see government pay out £31m to past claimants
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Employment tribunal fees will be immediately scrapped after the Supreme Court ruled they were unfair, especially for people on lower incomes.
The Ministry of Justice made the commitment following a landmark ruling that the introduction of fees was "inconsistent with access to justice", says The Guardian.
The case was brought by the trade union Unison, which had lost previous rulings in the High Court and the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court verdict cannot be appealed.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
As a result, thousands of people who paid up to £1,200 to challenge their employers since 2013, when the fees were first introduced, will be reimbursed for any fees not already recovered.
It is estimated this will cost the government around £27m, although Tim Forer, a partner in the employment law team at Blake Morgan, says the figure could be as high as £31m.
Judges cited a 70 per cent fall in employment tribunal cases since 2013 and said the fees were also "contrary to the Equality Act 2010 as they disproportionately affected women".
A drop in cases relating to maternity discrimination was noted, despite steady rises in the number of cases reported to Citizens Advice.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Under the regime, workers had to pay at least £160 to issue a claim, rising to £250 for serious claims such as unfair dismissal. If a hearing was granted, a further £230 to £950 was charged.
Total costs could add up to £1,200 to bring a case and £1,600 to appeal a ruling.
If they won, these charges would in many instances be repaid along with any damages ordered. But campaigners argued the high upfront costs and risk of losing hard-to-prove cases were putting people off.
Frances O'Grady, general secretary of the TUC, said: "This is a massive win for working people. Too many low-paid workers couldn't afford to uphold their rights at work, even when they've faced harassment or have been sacked unfairly.
"Tribunal fees have been a bonanza for bad bosses, giving them free rein to mistreat staff. Any fees paid so far should be refunded as soon as possible."
-
The Olympic timekeepers keeping the Games on trackUnder the Radar Swiss watchmaking giant Omega has been at the finish line of every Olympic Games for nearly 100 years
-
Will increasing tensions with Iran boil over into war?Today’s Big Question President Donald Trump has recently been threatening the country
-
Corruption: The spy sheikh and the presidentFeature Trump is at the center of another scandal
-
How corrupt is the UK?The Explainer Decline in standards ‘risks becoming a defining feature of our political culture’ as Britain falls to lowest ever score on global index
-
The high street: Britain’s next political battleground?In the Spotlight Mass closure of shops and influx of organised crime are fuelling voter anger, and offer an opening for Reform UK
-
Is a Reform-Tory pact becoming more likely?Today’s Big Question Nigel Farage’s party is ahead in the polls but still falls well short of a Commons majority, while Conservatives are still losing MPs to Reform
-
Taking the low road: why the SNP is still standing strongTalking Point Party is on track for a fifth consecutive victory in May’s Holyrood election, despite controversies and plummeting support
-
What difference will the 'historic' UK-Germany treaty make?Today's Big Question Europe's two biggest economies sign first treaty since WWII, underscoring 'triangle alliance' with France amid growing Russian threat and US distance
-
Is the G7 still relevant?Talking Point Donald Trump's early departure cast a shadow over this week's meeting of the world's major democracies
-
Angela Rayner: Labour's next leader?Today's Big Question A leaked memo has sparked speculation that the deputy PM is positioning herself as the left-of-centre alternative to Keir Starmer
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans