Hillary Clinton: Five things we learnt from What Happened
Democratic candidate’s election memoir offers an intimate look at battle with Donald Trump
What Happened, Hillary Clinton’s much-anticipated new election memoir, includes candid insights into the race, from her primary face-off with Bernie Sanders, to her televised clashes with Trump and her experience on election night, when her Republican rival defied pollsters and pundits to clinch a shock victory.
It is a revealing new entry in an under-appreciated genre , says The New York Times - the memoirs of the defeated politician, which “tell us as much if not more about the mysteries of political character than do the accounts of battles won”.
So what does the book tell us about Clinton, Trump, and just what the heck happened on that world-changing night in November?
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Her concession outfit was chosen with a happier occasion in mind
Clinton had planned to wear an all-white ensemble to give her victory speech on election night, in tribute to the suffragettes who adopted the colour during the fight for women’s suffrage, The New York Times reports.
Instead, she was called upon to make a concession speech. The white suit was laid aside in favour of a dark grey blazer and purple shirt - but that choice too had a sad undertone for the Democratic candidate. The outfit was the “one I had intended to wear on my first trip to Washington as President Elect,” she reveals in the memoir.
Months later, she admits that she is still struggling to process her loss. Sometimes, she writes, “all I want to do is scream into a pillow”.
She attended Trump’s wedding for the “spectacle”
During the election campaign, much was made of the fact that Clinton and her husband had attended Trump’s 2005 wedding to Melania - suggesting that their apparent mutual loathing was a more recent phenomenon than it appeared.
In What Happened, Clinton seeks to clarify the incident: “We weren’t friends, so I assumed he wanted as much star power as he could get,” she says of the invitation. “I thought it would be a fun, gaudy, over-the-top spectacle, and I was right.”
She thinks Sanders entered the race for the wrong reasons
Clinton has some uncompromising words for her Democratic rival for the nomination, Bernie Sanders - a self-declared socialist who has spent the vast majority of his political career as an independent.
Rather than a genuine thirst to lead the country, Sanders was motivated by frustration with the Democratic Party’s doctrine, she writes.
“He didn't get into the race to make sure a Democrat won the White House, he got in to disrupt the Democratic Party,” Clinton writes, adding that Sanders is “fundamentally wrong” to consider the party insufficiently progressive.
However, in other parts of the book she expresses her gratitude to the senator from Vermont for his (belated) support in the later stages of the campaign.
She thinks Julian Assange is Putin’s puppet
Clinton is far less measured when it comes to Wikileaks founder Julian Assange, whose network was responsible for disseminating thousands of internal emails that are widely considered a key factor in her defeat.
Assange is a ”hypocrite who deserves to be held accountable for his actions,” she writes, accusing the Australian of being a Putin stooge who deliberately undermined the Democratic campaign to advance Russian interests.
She feared being ‘twisted by anger’ over Bill’s indiscretions
In one of the more personal moments of the memoir, Clinton addresses a subject that has become a central part of the Hillary “story” - her marriage to Bill Clinton, unforgettably strained by a very public affair during his presidency.
At times, she writes, she was “deeply unsure” about the future of the marriage. “I asked myself the questions that mattered to me: Do I still love him? And can I still be in this marriage without becoming unrecognizable to myself — twisted by anger, resentment or remoteness?,” she says. “The answers were always yes. So I kept going.”
Hillary Clinton blames Bernie Sanders for ‘lasting damage’
6 September
According to extracts from her soon-to-be-published book,"What Happened", which have been posted online by a group of Clinton supporters, Hillary Clinton has accused Sanders of paving the way for Donald Trump's "Crooked Hillary" campaign. She says that her rival's attacks during the presidential campaign caused "lasting damage".
Sanders, an independent senator, had challenged Clinton for the Democratic nomination for president. Clinton wrote that her opponent had to resort to "innuendo" and "impugning" her character because they "agreed on so much".
Clinton also wrote that President Barack Obama advised her to grit her teeth and "lay off Bernie" as much as she could, according to the excerpts. That strategy, Clinton wrote, made her feel she was "in a straitjacket."
She said that Jake Sullivan, her top policy aide, told her that Sanders's campaign strategy reminded him of a scene from the movie "There's Something About Mary," "where a hitchhiker says he has a plan to roll out seven-minute abs to top the famous eight-minute abs," reports CNN.
In the film, Ben Stiller's character asks: "Why not six-minutes abs?"
Clinton wrote: "That's what it was like in policy debates with Bernie. We would promise a bold infrastructure investment plan or an ambitious new apprenticeship program for young people, and then Bernie would announce basically the same thing, but bigger. On issue after issue, it was like he kept promising four-minute abs, or even no-minutes abs. Magic abs!"
These arguments about Sanders "may be in tension" says Vox, as Clinton is criticising him "both for advancing an unrealistic policy vision and for leveling personal attacks because there were no meaningful policy differences between them".
While Clinton remains "a powerful force among Democrats – and will be in the coming elections – there are some who have publicly said they would rather the party move on from the 2016 election," says CNN.
There are also competing views as to why Clinton lost the election last November. Progressives ranging from "hardcore Sanders supporters" to Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer and Barack Obama have blamed Clinton and her team for "failing to offer a compelling economic vision," says Vox.
"Our problem is missing the forest for the trees," Dan Schwerin, Clinton's speechwriter, wrote in an email about the struggles of her first campaign speech. "We've never found a good way (or at least a way she embraces) that sums up her vision for how America would be different."
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
How much of a blow is ICC arrest warrant for Netanyahu?
Today's Big Question Action by Hague court damages Israel's narrative that Gaza conflict is a war between 'good and evil'
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
UK gynaecological care crisis: why thousands of women are left in pain
The Explainer Waiting times have tripled over the past decade thanks to lack of prioritisation or funding for women's health
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
'The Hum': the real-life noise behind The Listeners
In The Spotlight Can some of us also hear the disturbing sound that plagues characters in the hit TV show – and where is it coming from?
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
John Prescott: was he Labour's last link to the working class?
Today's Big Quesiton 'A total one-off': tributes have poured in for the former deputy PM and trade unionist
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Last hopes for justice for UK's nuclear test veterans
Under the Radar Thousands of ex-service personnel say their lives have been blighted by aggressive cancers and genetic mutations
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
Will Donald Trump wreck the Brexit deal?
Today's Big Question President-elect's victory could help UK's reset with the EU, but a free-trade agreement with the US to dodge his threatened tariffs could hinder it
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is the next Tory leader up against?
Today's Big Question Kemi Badenoch or Robert Jenrick will have to unify warring factions and win back disillusioned voters – without alienating the centre ground
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
What is Lammy hoping to achieve in China?
Today's Big Question Foreign secretary heads to Beijing as Labour seeks cooperation on global challenges and courts opportunities for trade and investment
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Is Britain about to 'boil over'?
Today's Big Question A message shared across far-right groups listed more than 30 potential targets for violence in the UK today
By Sorcha Bradley, The Week UK Published
-
UK's Starmer slams 'far-right thuggery' at riots
Speed Read The anti-immigrant violence was spurred by false rumors that the suspect in the Southport knife attack was an immigrant
By Peter Weber, The Week US Published
-
The three best and three worst modern vice-presidential nominees
In Depth A candidate's choice of running mate can tip the scales in one of two directions
By David Faris Published