A British Army major who has faced seven separate inquiries over the death of an Iraqi teenager 15 years ago is being investigated again.
Major Robert Campbell told The Daily Telegraph that he feels “broken” after being told he faces an eighth probe into the May 2003 incident. He vehemently denies allegations that, along with two colleagues from the Royal Engineers, he forced 19-year-old Said Shabram into a river in Basra.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The three men, two of whom are still serving, “faced a three-year inquiry by the Iraq Historic Allegations Team (Ihat), a unit investigating claims against British forces that was wound up last year after the solicitor whose firm brought most of its cases was struck off for corruption and dishonesty”, says The Times.
“This sordid process has broken me. I was assured it was finally over and shortly after that I received a long service and good conduct medal,” Campbell told the Telegraph.
“Last week I received an email telling me they are starting another investigation, which after seven investigations seemed unspeakably cruel and vindictive. It has been 15 years and there have been no fewer than seven investigations and inquiries. No other army I know of treats its soldiers as political fodder like this.”
Conservative MP Johnny Mercer, a former army officer who led a parliamentary inquiry into Ihat, urged ministers to bring the investigations to an end.
The Ministry of Defence said: “The welfare of our personnel is of the utmost importance and we have a legal obligation to ensure the full facts of alleged incidents are known.”
-
‘Businesses that lose money and are uncompetitive won’t survive’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Film reviews: Springsteen: Deliver Me From Nowhere, If I Had Legs I’d Kick You, Frankenstein, and Blue MoonFeature A rock star on the rise turns inward, a stressed mother begins to unravel, and more
-
Podcast reviews: ‘Fela Kuti: Fear No Man,’ ‘David Bowie: Changeling’ and ‘The Adam Friedland Show’feature Fela Kuti’s revolutionary life, David Bowie’s early years, and Adam Friedland reinvents the talk show
-
Is UK's new defence plan transformational or too little, too late?Today's Big Question Labour's 10-year strategy 'an exercise in tightly bounded ambition' already 'overshadowed by a row over money'
-
The state of Britain's Armed ForcesThe Explainer Geopolitical unrest and the unreliability of the Trump administration have led to a frantic re-evaluation of the UK's military capabilities
-
Is Europe's defence too reliant on the US?Today's Big Question As the UK and EU plan to 're-arm', how easy will it be to disentangle from US equipment and support?
-
Is the British Army ready to deploy to Ukraine?Today's Big Question The UK 'would be expected to play a major role' if a peacekeeping force is sent to enforce ceasefire with Russia
-
British defence: the crisis in the Armed ForcesTalking Point Depleted military power may not be able to meet its own commitment to up defence spending to 2.5%
-
The murky role of military contractors in warThe Explainer A civil case against US company has revived debate over the increasing use of private security firms in military operations
-
The issue of women and conscriptionUnder the radar Ukraine military adviser hints at widening draft to women, as other countries weigh defence options amid global insecurity
-
Grant Shapps goes to war on military's 'woke' diversity policiesTalking Point Defence secretary condemns 'extremist culture' as Army reportedly plans to relax security checks on overseas recruits
