The UK has been referred to the European Court of Justice over its long-standing failure to deal with dangerous and illegal levels of air pollution.
The EU's Environment Commissioner Karmenu Vella said the bloc “owed it to its citizens” to take legal action after continued failures by national governments to meet EU limits for nitrogen dioxide.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
According to the Royal College of Physicians and the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health, air pollution causes around 40,000 early deaths a year in the UK.
The government has lost a number of legal battles on air pollution in British courts over recent years and now “could face fines totalling millions of pounds, ongoing until the problem is solved”, reports the BBC.
Levels of nitrogen dioxide, which is mostly produced by diesel vehicles, has been illegally high since 2010, but the governments’ latest plan in 2017 was condemned as “woefully inadequate” by city leaders and “inexcusable” by doctors.
Perhaps unsurprisingly, the decision to take the UK to court has fuelled debate about Brexit, with environmentalists claiming that the EU had demonstrated what will be lost after Britain leaves the bloc.
Environment Secretary Michael Gove previously promised that environmental governance would not be diluted when the UK leaves the EU. But he revealed last week that his post-Brexit environmental watchdog would not have the automatic power to take the government to court, says the BBC.
Yesterday’s referral came the same day as the Energy and Climate Change Secretary Greg Clark “announced new measures to ramp up fossil fuel production, citing the “substantial benefits” of exploiting shale gas”, The Independent reports.
-
Why is the world so divided over plastics?Today's Big Question UN negotiations on first global plastic treaty are at stake, as fossil fuel companies, petrostates and plastic industry work to resist a legal cap on production
-
Anti-anxiety drug has a not-too-surprising effect on fishUnder the radar The fish act bolder and take more risks
-
Oysters from New York's past could shore up its futureUnder the Radar Project aims to seed a billion oysters in the city's waterways to improve water quality, fight coastal erosion and protect against storm surges
-
Ottawa climate talks: can global plastic problem be solved?In the Spotlight Nations aim to draft world's first treaty on plastic pollution, but resistance from oil- and gas-producing countries could limit scope
-
EPA limits carcinogenic emissions at 218 US plantsSpeed Read The new rule aims to reduce cancer-causing air pollution in areas like Louisiana's 'Cancer Alley'
-
The push for net zeroThe Explainer Britain has committed to reaching net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. What will this involve?
-
Poor pollution regulation (still) impacts the lives of Gulf Coast residentsUnder the Radar Many people in the region are experiencing health problems as a result of nearby refineries
-
Could bacteria solve the world's plastic problem?The Explainer Scientists are genetically engineering bacteria to break down plastic
