Why ‘trans on Wednesdays’ activist was suspended by Labour
David Lewis stoked gender self-indentification row by standing for women’s officer role

Labour has suspended an activist who attempted to stand as women’s officer while claiming that he identified as female “on Wednesdays”.
Party sources told The Guardian that David Lewis, who was in the running to be Basingstoke’s Labour Party women officer, had been suspended pending an investigation.
Lewis announced his intention to stand for the role earlier this week, and told The Spectator: “My womanness is expressed by my saying, ‘I self-identify as a woman’ now and again on Wednesdays. I make no changes in my behaviour or my appearance.”
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
He said he didn’t expect to win office, but insisted: “My priority here is to inform the CLP [constituency Labour Party]... about what happens when you say that someone’s gender depends only on what they say and nothing else.”
Following his suspension, a party spokesperson said that Labour was “committed to upholding the principle of affirmative action for women” but that obvious abuse of the process would not be tolerated.
“Anyone attempting to breach Labour Party rules and subvert the intention of all-women shortlists, women’s officers or minimum quotas for women will be dealt with via our established safeguards, selection procedures and disciplinary measures,” the spokesperson warned.
What is the party's gender self-identification policy?
At a meeting on Tuesday, Labour’s National Executive Committee reaffirmed a policy of self-identification, meaning that roles such as the one Lewis applied for are open to “self-identifying trans women”. The crux of that policy is that if someone says they are a woman, Labour accepts that they are a woman. The party does not check or verify a statement of self-identified gender.
The decision, passed without opposition, guarantees trans women equal access to all-women parliamentary shortlists, women’s officer posts and minimum quotas for women.
“The thinking behind that approach is that transgender people should not be subject to additional checks or ‘gatekeeping’ simply to be accepted for who they are,” says The Spectator’s James Kirkup. “Non-trans people don’t have to prove their gender, so why should trans people?”
On wider public policy, the party “is aware that there are real concerns about protecting all women, including vulnerable women (in refuges, for example), from any abuses of the new rights”, says HuffPost’s Paul Waugh. “Lewis’s suspension is clearly part of the message that it would crack down hard on any man who pretended to be a trans woman.”
However, Kirkup argues Lewis’s suspension highlights a key problem with Labour’s self-ID rules.
“The only way to conclude that David Lewis is engaged in a ‘stunt’ or is ‘abusing’ Labour’s self-ID rules is to make a judgement on the validity of his declared gender identity,” Kirkup says.
“If you adhere to a position of accepting self-identified trans women as women (and thus entitled to women’s legal rights) then you have to accept David Lewis is a woman - because he says he is a woman.”
Defending Labour’s decision, trans journalist Shon Faye writes in The Guardian: “The idea that self-ID facilitates an easy route for men or anyone not deadly serious about their identity as a trans woman to sneak into Parliament - or anywhere else for that matter - is a canard, and a weak one at that.
“Politics is already a game rigged for incompetent white men. How would such a man benefit from posing as a trans woman?”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
UK-India trade deal: how the social security arrangements will work
The Explainer A National Insurance exemption in the UK-India trade deal is causing concern but should British workers worry?
-
Man arrested after 'suspicious' fires at properties linked to Keir Starmer
Speed Read Prime minister thanks emergency services after fire at his former family home in north London
-
Elon Musk's SpaceX has created a new city in Texas
under the radar Starbase is home to SpaceX's rocket launch site
-
Supreme Court allows transgender troop ban
speed read The US Supreme Court will let the Trump administration begin executing its ban on transgender military service members
-
Where is the left-wing Reform?
Today's Big Question As the Labour Party leans towards the right, progressive voters have been left with few alternatives
-
Ed Miliband, Tony Blair and the climate 'credibility gap'
Talking Point Comments by former PM Tony Blair have opened up Labour to attacks over its energy policies
-
Is the UK's two-party system finally over?
Today's Big Question 'Unprecedented fragmentation puts voters on a collision course with the electoral system'
-
Will divisions over trans issue derail Keir Starmer's government?
Today's Big Question Rebellion is brewing following the Supreme Court's ruling that a woman is defined by biological sex under equality law
-
Labour and the so-called 'banter ban'
Talking Point Critics are claiming that a clause in the new Employment Rights Bill will spell the end of free-flowing pub conversation
-
Did China sabotage British Steel?
Today's Big Question Emergency situation at Scunthorpe blast furnaces could be due to 'neglect', but caution needed, says business secretary
-
What is Starmer's £33m plan to smash 'vile' Channel migration gangs?
Today's Big Question PM lays out plan to tackle migration gangs like international terrorism, with cooperation across countries and enhanced police powers