How will Labour pay for welfare U-turn?
A dramatic concession to Labour rebels has left the government facing more fiscal dilemmas

After the government was forced into a further, last-minute climb-down on its welfare reform bill, questions are now being asked about how the Treasury will balance the books.
The extra expense is expected to be in the range of £2.5 billion and could mean "tax rises in this autumn's budget are inevitable", said Chris Mason at the BBC, while the Chancellor Rachel Reeves is "being questioned by Labour figures at all levels" about where the money will come from.
What did the commentators say?
Though the bill eventually passed through Parliament, the debacle showed the government is "transparently not in control of events" and the "implications" of the concessions are "head-spinning", said the BBC. Tax rises look likely, and potential changes to policies like the two-child benefit cap will "no longer be possible".
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
That lack of control in trying to make billions of savings ended as it did in the government's "attempt to cut the winter fuel allowance", with it "spending slightly more than if it had done nothing at all", said Will Dunn in The New Statesman.
It leaves the chancellor in a "deeply frustrating position", not least because she is cornered by her own "fiscal rules" and the promise "not to raise any of the three biggest revenue-raising taxes". Perhaps now is the "time to be bold" for Reeves; "tweaks to the system" are not likely to solve Britain's problems, but an "overhauled" tax system might.
Bending the fiscal rules would mean softening "her self-proclaimed 'iron chancellor' image", but she has already "declined to explicitly rule out amending the rules", said George Parker and Sam Fleming in the Financial Times. A change, however, could "damage the chancellor's credibility with investors and put her job on the line", particularly given her already "mounting fiscal and political woes".
Reeves "could yet strike lucky", and "growth could bounce back" to rapidly ease the pressure, said Heather Stewart in The Guardian. However, the current fiscal outlook means "she would have to proceed with caution" to "allow herself more leeway", and the Treasury "surely" must now be "poring over a menu of potential tax rises" to announce in the autumn budget.
Higher taxes would not be opposed by many left-wing Labour MPs, and the successful rebellion against the welfare bill means they "scent blood in the water", said Ben Riley-Smith in The Telegraph.
The "worsening economic forecasts" and the "eroded" authority at the top of government will be where the rebels "press their advantage", with almost certainly calls for "new wealth taxes" to help balance the books.
What next?
Labour entered government determined to present "stability and strength" in its handling of the economy, but so far its "tax and spending decisions" have turned into a "grim spectator sport", said Stewart. The Treasury now has "unenviable tasks" ahead of it before the autumn, including working on a "possible package of tax increases" and hoping the Office for Budget Responsibility's forecast will not "downgrade its expectations of productivity" as much as is predicted.
There are now two choices facing the government: "muddle through" with "compromises" until facing "disaster at the next election", or "try to make history" with bold plans, said Dunn. But while it's easy to "present such plans", actually "getting it past the party and the public is very different".
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
Richard Windsor is a freelance writer for The Week Digital. He began his journalism career writing about politics and sport while studying at the University of Southampton. He then worked across various football publications before specialising in cycling for almost nine years, covering major races including the Tour de France and interviewing some of the sport’s top riders. He led Cycling Weekly’s digital platforms as editor for seven of those years, helping to transform the publication into the UK’s largest cycling website. He now works as a freelance writer, editor and consultant.
-
Japan's surname conundrum
Under the Radar Law requiring couples to share one surname hinders women in the workplace and lowers birth rate, campaigners claim
-
How successful would Elon Musk's third party be?
Today's Big Question Musk has vowed to start a third party after falling out with Trump
-
Music reviews: Bruce Springsteen and Benson Boone
Feature "Tracks II: The Lost Albums" and "American Heart"
-
Backbench rebellions and broken promises: is it getting harder to govern?
Today's Big Question Backbench rebellions and broken promises: is it getting harder to govern?
-
Labour's brewing welfare rebellion
The Explainer Keir Starmer seems determined to press on with disability benefit cuts despite a "nightmare" revolt by his own MPs
-
Five takeaways from Rachel Reeves' Spending Review
The Explainer The winners and losers as the government sets its budgets for the next four years
-
Angela Rayner: Labour's next leader?
Today's Big Question A leaked memo has sparked speculation that the deputy PM is positioning herself as the left-of-centre alternative to Keir Starmer
-
Is Starmer's plan to send migrants overseas Rwanda 2.0?
Today's Big Question Failed asylum seekers could be removed to Balkan nations under new government plans
-
Can Starmer sell himself as the 'tough on immigration' PM?
Today's Big Question Former human rights lawyer 'now needs to own the change – not just mouth the slogans' to win over a sceptical public
-
Where is the left-wing Reform?
Today's Big Question As the Labour Party leans towards the right, progressive voters have been left with few alternatives
-
Ed Miliband, Tony Blair and the climate 'credibility gap'
Talking Point Comments by former PM Tony Blair have opened up Labour to attacks over its energy policies