Should there be a tax for elderly care?

Over-40s should pay a 'social care premium', two committees say

MPs have called for a ‘social care premium’ to fund elderly care
(Image credit: 2015 Getty Images)

A powerful group of MPs has called for the introduction of a new tax for over-40s, in a bid to secure funding for elderly care.

The call for a “social care premium” came in a rare joint report by the Housing, Communities and Local Government and Health and Social Care Committees, which described the current system as “unsustainable”.

Subscribe to The Week

Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

SUBSCRIBE & SAVE
https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/flexiimages/jacafc5zvs1692883516.jpg

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.

Sign up

“Too many people are being left without the care and support they need and it is time for a decision to be made about how the costs are shared,” she continued.

Is the tax necessary?

The aim of the proposal is to ensure that the “personal elements” of social care, such as help with eating, dressing and washing, are available for free for the elderly, whether they receive that assistance at home or an aged care facility.

The proposal “echoes the funding of social care in Japan, which has the highest proportion of older people of any country”, the Times says.

The Independent reports that the fund could either “operate as an additional element of national insurance or through a separate mechanism, as happens in Germany”.

How would it work?

Under the cross-party proposal, payments would begin once a person turns 40 and continue beyond the age of 65, with the value of pensions and investments taken into account.

However, the report says that a minimum earnings threshold should be in place for the protection of low-income earners.

Explore More