Astronomers are calling for Pluto’s status to be re-evaluated, after the solar system’s most distant world was downgraded to a “dwarf planet” in 2006.
A new study headed by the University of Central Florida’s planetary scientist Philip Metzger suggests that “well over 100” worlds have been incorrectly classified as planets since 1802.
Metzger argues that the official definition of a planet is “sloppy” and that scientists use the term liberally because it’s “functionally useful”.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The definition was put in place by the International Astronomical Union (IAU), a group of experts responsible for handling “astronomical nomenclature” around 12 years ago, says Space.com.
Under the IAU’s definition, planets must have a dominant gravitational pull in their orbit around the Sun. This is known as “orbit clearing”.
The Moon isn’t a planet because it revolves around Earth, for instance, but Earth is classified as a planet because it orbits the Sun, which means it’s the dominant gravitational body.
Pluto was declassified to a dwarf planet when the IAU issued its official definition in 2006 because the icy world shares its orbit with objects in the Kuiper Belt, an area in the far reaches of the solar system.
But Metzger claims there would be no planets in the solar system if the IAU’s definition was taken literally, because “no planet clears its orbit”.
Responding to the study, an IAU spokesperson told Fox News that the union hadn’t received an official proposal to alter Pluto’s classification.
“There is a very clear, and known, way to table motions in the IAU, which is to propose an IAU Resolution through the relevant working group(s) and division,” the spokesperson said. “So far, no such resolutions have been proposed.”
The spokesperson added that it was “good and healthy” to debate these topics.
-
Fannie Flagg’s 6 favorite books that sparked her imaginationFeature The author recommends works by Johanna Spyri, John Steinbeck, and more
-
Google: A monopoly past its prime?Feature Google’s antitrust case ends with a slap on the wrist as courts struggle to keep up with the tech industry’s rapid changes
-
Patrick Hemingway: The Hemingway son who tended to his father’s legacyFeature He was comfortable in the shadow of his famous father, Ernest Hemingway
-
Another Starship blast sets back Musk's Mars hopesSpeed Read Nobody was killed in the explosion, which occurred in south Texas
-
Test flight of orbital rocket from Europe explodesSpeed Read Isar Aerospace conducted the first test flight of the Spectrum orbital rocket, which crashed after takeoff
-
Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk and the billionaire space raceThe Explainer Tesla CEO and Amazon founder vie for dominance of satellite launch market and could influence Nasa plans to return to Moon
-
Starliner: What went wrong?Today's Big Question Boeing spacecraft has had a 'long, difficult road'
-
Boeing, SpaceX successfully test key rocketsSpeed Read Boeing’s Starliner docked at the ISS and SpaceX completed its fourth test launch of its Starship spacecraft
-
Nasa reveals first findings from asteroid that could explain origins of lifeSpeed Read Sample from Bennu has been found to contain an abundance of water and carbon
-
How worried we should be about space debrisfeature As part of a rocket washes up in Australia scientists warn ‘critical mass’ of orbital junk could only be decades away
-
What is NASA's Artemis program?Speed Read NASA's ambitious Artemis program will eventually create a base on the moon — and lay the foundations for manned missions to Mars
