Afghanistan resists offer to outsource Taliban war
President Ashraf Ghani dismisses plans laid out by private military contractor Blackwater
The government of Afghanistan has rejected proposals to privatise the war on terror in the country, following a “renewed push” by private military contractor Blackwater.
The company’s founder, Erik Prince, has been lobbying officials for more than a year about his plan for Blackwater’s own private air force and ground troops to take over parts of existing US military operations in Afghanistan, Reuters reports.
In an interview with NBC News in August, Prince said his firm would send over around 6,000 private military contractors as reinforcements for 2,000 US Special Forces, a move that would see US and Nato forces largely withdrawn from the region.
Subscribe to The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
The 49-year old former US Navy Seal told a briefing in London that he could reduce the cost of America’s policy in Afghanistan from $52bn annually to just over $10bn, says The National.
However, Afghan president Ashraf Ghani - who is standing for re-election in April - has “reacted angrily” to suggestions that the war should be privatised, threatening “all legal options” against anyone who made attempts to do so.
On Thursday, Ghani’s national security adviser issued a statement criticising Prince for evoking what Afghan officials called a “destructive and divisive debate”.
“Under no circumstances will the Afghan government and people allow the counterterrorism fight to become a private, for-profit business,” the statement said. “As a sovereign nation, we will consider all legal options against those who try to privatise war on our land.”
However, an unnamed Afghan source told The Washington Post that Prince’s charm offensive was making headway in Kabul, where he is perceived as having the ear of the White House.
“He’s winning Afghans over with the assumption that he’s close to Trump,” the source said, adding that many of Prince’s ideas “feed into frustration with and within the Afghan military, particularly given its high casualty rate”.
Defending his plan, Prince said: “I would say six months after the programme is fully ramped up, you [would] have a very different situation on the ground, I will commit to that.”
But officials from the US military have also expressed concerns about Prince’s proposal.
General Joseph Votel, chief of US Central Command, said on Thursday that it would not be a good strategy to turn over US national interest to contractors, Afghan news channel Tolo News reports.
“We have vital interests here and we are pursuing them with legitimate forces that can do that,” Votel said during a Pentagon news briefing.
“Even broader than that, the bilateral security agreement that I think is in place with Afghanistan does not allow this. The Afghans don’t want this.”
Sign up for Today's Best Articles in your inbox
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
-
The complaint that could change reality TV for ever
In the Spotlight A labour complaint filed against Love Is Blind has the potential to bolster the rights of reality stars across the US
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Assad's fall upends the Captagon drug empire
Multi-billion-dollar drug network sustained former Syrian regime
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
Sudoku medium: December 19, 2024
The Week's daily medium sudoku puzzle
By The Week Staff Published
-
Ukraine-Russia: are both sides readying for nuclear war?
Today's Big Question Putin changes doctrine to lower threshold for atomic weapons after Ukraine strikes with Western missiles
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published
-
Iran and Israel: is all-out war inevitable?
Talking Points Tehran has vowed revenge for assassinations of Hamas and Hezbollah leaders, but Gaza ceasefire could offer way out
By The Week UK Published
-
'Second only to a nuclear bomb' – the controversial arms Russia is using in Ukraine
The Explainer Thermobaric bombs 'capable of vaporising human bodies' have been used against Ukraine
By Chas Newkey-Burden, The Week UK Published
-
Who would fight Europe's war against Russia?
Today's Big Question Western armies are struggling to recruit and retain soldiers amid fears Moscow's war in Ukraine may spread across Europe
By Abby Wilson Published
-
Aid to Ukraine: too little, too late?
Talking Point House of Representatives finally 'met the moment' but some say it came too late
By The Week UK Published
-
The murky role of military contractors in war
The Explainer A civil case against US company has revived debate over the increasing use of private security firms in military operations
By Richard Windsor, The Week UK Published
-
What would happen if World War Three started?
In depth With conflicts in Ukraine, Middle East, Africa and Asia-Pacific, the 'spark' that could ignite all-out war 'already exists'
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Last updated
-
Ukraine's unconventional approach to reconstruction
Under the radar Digitally savvy nation uses popular app to file compensation claims, access funds and rebuild destroyed homes
By Harriet Marsden, The Week UK Published