Donald Trump sacks Jeff Sessions as US Attorney General
What will the dismissal of the nation’s most senior law enforcement official mean for the Russia inquiry?

Jeff Session has resigned as US Attorney General at President Donald Trump’s request, raising doubts about the future of the Russia investigation.
The former Alabama senator’s job has been under threat since he stepped aside from Robert Mueller’s inquiry into potential collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Moscow last year.
“The presidential axe that had been hovering over Jeff Sessions for what has seemed like an eternity just came swinging down with a thud,” says the BBC’s Anthony Zurcher.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.

Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sessions will be temporarily replaced as the nation’s most senior law enforcement official by his chief of staff and Trump loyalist, Matthew Whitaker.
Democrats immediately began to call for Whitaker to recuse himself from overseeing the Mueller inquiry, citing his earlier criticism of the probe, NPR reports.
In an op-ed for CNN last year, Whitaker said reports of Mueller potentially investigating Trump’s finances suggested the special counsel was going beyond his mandate.
Whitaker has even mused about how an acting attorney general could effectively kill the investigation, Vox points out.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“Given his record of threats to undermine and weaken the Russia investigation, Matthew Whitaker should recuse himself from any involvement in Mueller’s investigation,” tweeted House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
Furious Democrats, emboldened by winning control of the House in Tuesday’s elections, also promised to investigate Sessions’s forced resignation and suggested Trump’s actions could amount to obstruction of justice if he intended to disrupt the criminal probe, the Washington Post reports.
Congressman Jerry Nadler, the incoming chairman of the judiciary committee said the decision to sack Sessions “fits a clear pattern” of interference from President Trump.
“There is no mistaking what this means, and what is at stake: this is a constitutionally perilous moment for our country and for the president,” he said in a statement.
What happens next?
The New York Times reports that Justice Department ethics advisers may be asked to weigh whether Whitaker should recuse himself.
If he were to agree to do that, Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general who has been overseeing the inquiry since Sessions stepped aside, would continue to oversee the special counsel.
But what Whitaker will actually do in his new role remains unclear, says Vox.
The “most alarming scenario is Trump has installed Whitaker specifically to do the president’s bidding and thwart the probe — completely shutting things down to protect the president,” it says.
A Trump administration official told the NYT that Whitaker had no immediate plans to publicly comment about Mueller or to take actions regarding the Russia inquiry.
“I am committed to leading a fair department with the highest ethical standards that upholds the rule of law and seeks justice for all Americans,” Whitaker said in a statement.
-
Bluetoothing: the phenomenon driving HIV spike in Fiji
Under the Radar ‘Blood-swapping’ between drug users fuelling growing health crisis on Pacific island
-
Marisa Silver’s 6 favorite books that capture a lifetime
Feature The author recommends works by John Williams, Ian McEwan, and more
-
Book reviews: ‘We the People: A History of the U.S. Constitution’ and ‘Will There Ever Be Another You’
Feature The many attempts to amend the U.S. Constitution and Patricia Lockwood’s struggle with long Covid
-
Can Trump bully Netanyahu into Gaza peace?
Today's Big Question The Israeli leader was ‘strong-armed’ into new peace deal
-
Court allows Trump’s Texas troops to head to Chicago
Speed Read Trump is ‘using our service members as pawns in his illegal effort to militarize our nation’s cities,’ said Gov. J.B. Pritzker
-
The GOP: Merging flag and cross
Feature Donald Trump has launched a task force to pursue “anti-Christian policies”
-
Five key questions about the Gaza peace deal
The Explainer Many ‘unresolved hurdles’ remain before Donald Trump’s 20-point plan can get the go-ahead
-
Judge bars Trump’s National Guard moves in Oregon
Speed Read In an emergency hearing, a federal judge blocked President Donald Trump from sending National Guard troops into Portland
-
Russia: already at war with Europe?
Talking Point As Kremlin begins ‘cranking up attacks’ on Ukraine’s European allies, questions about future action remain unanswered
-
Trump declares ‘armed conflict’ with drug cartels
speed read This provides a legal justification for recent lethal military strikes on three alleged drug trafficking boats
-
Supreme Court rules for Fed’s Cook in Trump feud
Speed Read Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook can remain in her role following Trump’s attempts to oust her