Donald Trump sacks Jeff Sessions as US Attorney General
What will the dismissal of the nation’s most senior law enforcement official mean for the Russia inquiry?
Jeff Session has resigned as US Attorney General at President Donald Trump’s request, raising doubts about the future of the Russia investigation.
The former Alabama senator’s job has been under threat since he stepped aside from Robert Mueller’s inquiry into potential collusion between the Trump presidential campaign and Moscow last year.
“The presidential axe that had been hovering over Jeff Sessions for what has seemed like an eternity just came swinging down with a thud,” says the BBC’s Anthony Zurcher.
The Week
Escape your echo chamber. Get the facts behind the news, plus analysis from multiple perspectives.
Sign up for The Week's Free Newsletters
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
From our morning news briefing to a weekly Good News Newsletter, get the best of The Week delivered directly to your inbox.
Sessions will be temporarily replaced as the nation’s most senior law enforcement official by his chief of staff and Trump loyalist, Matthew Whitaker.
Democrats immediately began to call for Whitaker to recuse himself from overseeing the Mueller inquiry, citing his earlier criticism of the probe, NPR reports.
In an op-ed for CNN last year, Whitaker said reports of Mueller potentially investigating Trump’s finances suggested the special counsel was going beyond his mandate.
Whitaker has even mused about how an acting attorney general could effectively kill the investigation, Vox points out.
A free daily email with the biggest news stories of the day – and the best features from TheWeek.com
“Given his record of threats to undermine and weaken the Russia investigation, Matthew Whitaker should recuse himself from any involvement in Mueller’s investigation,” tweeted House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
Furious Democrats, emboldened by winning control of the House in Tuesday’s elections, also promised to investigate Sessions’s forced resignation and suggested Trump’s actions could amount to obstruction of justice if he intended to disrupt the criminal probe, the Washington Post reports.
Congressman Jerry Nadler, the incoming chairman of the judiciary committee said the decision to sack Sessions “fits a clear pattern” of interference from President Trump.
“There is no mistaking what this means, and what is at stake: this is a constitutionally perilous moment for our country and for the president,” he said in a statement.
What happens next?
The New York Times reports that Justice Department ethics advisers may be asked to weigh whether Whitaker should recuse himself.
If he were to agree to do that, Rod Rosenstein, the deputy attorney general who has been overseeing the inquiry since Sessions stepped aside, would continue to oversee the special counsel.
But what Whitaker will actually do in his new role remains unclear, says Vox.
The “most alarming scenario is Trump has installed Whitaker specifically to do the president’s bidding and thwart the probe — completely shutting things down to protect the president,” it says.
A Trump administration official told the NYT that Whitaker had no immediate plans to publicly comment about Mueller or to take actions regarding the Russia inquiry.
“I am committed to leading a fair department with the highest ethical standards that upholds the rule of law and seeks justice for all Americans,” Whitaker said in a statement.
-
Zimbabwe’s driving crisisUnder the Radar Southern African nation is experiencing a ‘public health disaster’ with one of the highest road fatality rates in the world
-
The Mint’s 250th anniversary coins face a whitewashing controversyThe Explainer The designs omitted several notable moments for civil rights and women’s rights
-
‘If regulators nix the rail merger, supply chain inefficiency will persist’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Venezuela’s Trump-shaped power vacuumIN THE SPOTLIGHT The American abduction of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro has thrust South America’s biggest oil-producing state into uncharted geopolitical waters
-
Trump says US ‘in charge’ of Venezuela after Maduro grabSpeed Read The American president claims the US will ‘run’ Venezuela for an unspecified amount of time, contradicting a statement from Secretary of State Marco Rubio
-
‘Let 2026 be a year of reckoning’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day
-
Jack Smith: Trump ‘caused’ Jan. 6 riotSpeed Read
-
Wave of cancellations prompts Kennedy Center turmoilIN THE SPOTLIGHT Accusations and allegations fly as artists begin backing off their regularly scheduled appearances
-
Trump considers giving Ukraine a security guaranteeTalking Points Zelenskyy says it is a requirement for peace. Will Putin go along?
-
Why is Trump’s alleged strike on Venezuela shrouded in so much secrecy?TODAY'S BIG QUESTION Trump’s comments have raised more questions than answers about what his administration is doing in the Southern Hemisphere
-
Vance’s ‘next move will reveal whether the conservative movement can move past Trump’Instant Opinion Opinion, comment and editorials of the day